BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Vered Moskowicz

Vered Moskowicz appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.RAmath.AC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

A special case of the two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture

Let $f: \mathbb{C}[x,y] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ be a $\mathbb{C}$-algebra endomorphism having an invertible Jacobian. We show that for such $f$, if, in addition, the group of invertible elements of $\mathbb{C}[f(x),f(y),x][1/v] \subset \mathbb{C}(x,y)$ is contained in $\mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))-0$, then $f$ is an automorphism. Here $v \in \mathbb{C}[f(x),f(y)]-0$ is such that $y = u/v$, with $u \in \mathbb{C}[f(x),f(y),x]-0$. Keller's theorem (in dimension two) follows immediately, since Keller's condition $\mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))=\mathbb{C}(x,y)$ implies that the group of invertible elements of $\mathbb{C}[f(x),f(y),x][1/v]$ is contained in $\mathbb{C}(x,y)-0 = \mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))-0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Ideas about the Jacobian Conjecture

Let $F:\mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] \to \mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ be a $\mathbb{C}$-algebra endomorphism that has an invertible Jacobian. We bring two ideas concerning the Jacobian Conjecture: First, we conjecture that for all $n$, the degree of the field extension $\mathbb{C}(F(x_1),\ldots,F(x_n)) \subseteq \mathbb{C}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ is less than or equal to $d^{n-1}$, where $d$ is the minimum of the degrees of the $F(x_i)$'s. If this conjecture is true, then the generalized Jacobian Conjecture is true. Second, we suggest to replace in some known theorems the assumption on the degrees of the $F(x_i)$'s by a similar assumption on the degrees of the minimal polynomials of the $x_i$'s over $\mathbb{C}(F(x_1)\ldots,f(x_n))$; this way we obtain some analogous results to the known ones.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Observations on the two dimensional Jacobian Conjecture

The two dimensional Jacobian Conjecture says that a morphism $f:\mathbb{C}[x,y]\to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ having an invertible Jacobian, is invertible. We show that a morphism $f$ having an invertible Jacobian is invertible, in each of the following two special cases: The degree of $f(x)$ is $\leq 2$; The $(0,1)$-degrees or $(1,0)$-degrees of all monomials in $f(x)$ are of the same parity. In each case there is no restriction on the degree of $f(y)$ nor on the parity of the $(0,1)$-degrees or $(1,0)$-degrees of its monomials.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture and unique factorization

The two-dimensional Jacobian Conjecture says that a $\mathbb{C}$-algebra endomorphism $F:\mathbb{C}[x,y] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ that has an invertible Jacobian is an automorphism. We show that if a $\mathbb{C}$-algebra endomorphism $F:\mathbb{C}[x,y] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ has an invertible Jacobian and if $v \in \mathbb{C}[F(x),F(y),x]$ is a product of prime elements of $\mathbb{C}[F(x),F(y),x]$, then $F$ is an automorphism, where $v$ is such that $y = u/v$, where $u \in \mathbb{C}[F(x),F(y),x]$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A new proof of a known special case of the Jacobian Conjecture

The famous Jacobian Conjecture asks if a morphism $f:K[x,y]\to K[x,y]$ with invertible Jacobian, is invertible ($K$ is a characteristic zero field). A known result says that if $K[f(x),f(y)] \subseteq K[x,y]$ is an integral extension, then $f$ is invertible. We slightly generalize this known result to the following: If for some "good" $λ\in K$ (in a sense that will be explained) $m K[x,y] \neq K[x,y]$ for every maximal ideal $m$ of $K[f(x),f(y)][x+ λy]$, then $f$ is invertible. We also apply our ideas to the Jacobian Conjecture, without any further assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A slight generalization of Keller's theorem

The famous Jacobian problem asks: Is a morphism $f:\mathbb{C}[x,y]\to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ having an invertible Jacobian, invertible? If we add the assumption that $\mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))=\mathbb{C}(x,y)$, then $f$ is invertible; this result is due to O. H. Keller (1939). We suggest the following slight generalization of Keller's theorem: If $f:\mathbb{C}[x,y]\to \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is a morphism having an invertible Jacobian, and if there exist $n \geq 1$, $a \in \mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))^*$ and $b \in \mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))$ such that $(ax +b)^n \in \mathbb{C}(f(x),f(y))$, then $f$ is invertible. A similar result holds for $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_m]$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

About Dixmier's conjecture

The well-known Dixmier conjecture asks if every algebra endomorphism of the first Weyl algebra over a characteristic zero field is an automorphism. We bring a hopefully easier to solve conjecture, called the $γ,δ$ conjecture, and show that it is equivalent to the Dixmier conjecture. Up to checking that in the group generated by automorphisms and anti-automorphisms of $A_1$ all the involutions belong to one conjugacy class, we show that every involutive endomorphism from $(A_1,γ)$ to $(A_1,δ)$ is an automorphism ($γ$ and $δ$ are two involutions on $A_1$), and given an endomorphism $f$ of $A_1$ (not necessarily an involutive endomorphism), if one of $f(X)$,$f(Y)$ is symmetric or skew-symmetric (with respect to any involution on $A_1$), then $f$ is an automorphism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Involutions and the Jacobian conjecture

The famous Jacobian conjecture asks if an endomorphism $f$ of $K[x,y]$ ($K$ is a characteristic zero field) having a non-zero scalar Jacobian is invertible. Let $α$ be the exchange involution on $K[x,y]$: $α(x)= y$ and $α(y)= x$. An $α$-endomorphism $f$ of $K[x,y]$ is an endomorphism of $K[x,y]$ that preserves the involution $α$: $f α= αf$. It was shown that if $f$ is an $α$-endomorphism of $K[x,y]$ having a non-zero scalar Jacobian, then $f$ is invertible. Based on this, we bring more results that imply that a given endomorphism $f$ having a non-zero scalar Jacobian and additional conditions involving involutions, is invertible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The starred Dixmier conjecture for $A_1$

Let $A_1(K)=K \langle x,y | yx-xy= 1 \rangle$ be the first Weyl algebra over a characteristic zero field $K$ and let $α$ be the exchange involution on $A_1(K)$ given by $α(x)= y$ and $α(y)= x$. The Dixmier conjecture of Dixmier (1968) asks: Is every algebra endomorphism of the Weyl algebra $A_1(K)$ an automorphism? The aim of this paper is to prove that each $α$-endomorphism of $A_1(K)$ is an automorphism. Here an $α$-endomorphism of $A_1(K)$ is an endomorphism which preserves the involution $α$. We also prove an analogue result for the Jacobian conjecture in dimension 2, called $α-JC_2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The starred Dixmier's conjecture

Dixmier's famous question says the following: Is every algebra endomorphism of the first Weyl algebra, $A_1(F)$, where $F$ is a zero characteristic field, an automorphism? Let $α$ be the exchange involution on $A_1(F)$: $α(x)= y$, $α(y)= x$. An $α$-endomorphism of $A_1(F)$ is an endomorphism which preserves the involution $α$. Then one may ask the following question, which may be called the "$α$-Dixmier's problem $1$" or the "starred Dixmier's problem $1$": Is every $α$-endomorphism of $A_1(F)$ an automorphism?

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Herstein's question about simple rings with involution

The aim of this paper is to try to answer Herstein's question concerning simple rings with involution, namely: If $R$ is a simple ring with an involution of the first kind, with $dim_{Z(R)}R > 4$ and $\Char(Z(R))\neq 2$, is it true that $S^2=R$? We shall see that in such a ring $R$, $R=S^3$. We shall bring two possible criteria, each shows when $R=S^2$. The first criterion: There exist $x,y \in S$ such that $xy-yx \neq 0$ and $xSy \subseteq S^2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $S^2=R$. The second criterion: There exist $x,y \in S$ such that $xy+yx \neq 0$ and $xKy \subseteq S^2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $S^2=R$. Actually, those results are true without any restriction on the dimension of $R$ over $Z(R)$. In the special case of matrices (with the transpose involution and with the symplectic involution) over a field of characteristic not equal to 2, it is not difficult to find, for example, $x,y \in S$ such that $xy-yx \neq 0$ and for every $s \in S$, $xsy \in S^2$. Therefore, proving Herstein's remark that for matrices the answer is known to be positive. Similar results for $K^6$, $K^4$, $K+KSK$, $KS+K^2$, $SKS$ and $S^2K$ can also be found.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Prime affine algebras of GK dimension two which are almost PI algebras

An almost PI algebra is a generalisation of a just infinite algebra which does not satisfy a polynomial identity. An almost PI algebra has some nice properties: It is prime, has a countable cofinal subset of ideals and when satisfying ACC(semiprimes), it has only countably many height 1 primes. Consider an affine prime Goldie non-simple non-PI $k$-algebra $R$ of GK dimension $<3$, where $k$ is an uncountable field. $R$ is an almost PI algebra. We give some possible additional conditions which make such an algebra primitive. This gives a partial answer to Small's question: Let $R$ be an affine prime Noetherian $k$-algebra of GK dimension 2, where $k$ is any field. Does it follow that $R$ is PI or primitive? We also show that the center of $R$ is a finite dimensional field extension of $k$, and if, in addition, $k$ is algebraically closed, then $R$ is stably almost PI.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access