Paper detail

Herstein's question about simple rings with involution

The aim of this paper is to try to answer Herstein's question concerning simple rings with involution, namely: If $R$ is a simple ring with an involution of the first kind, with $dim_{Z(R)}R > 4$ and $\Char(Z(R))\neq 2$, is it true that $S^2=R$? We shall see that in such a ring $R$, $R=S^3$. We shall bring two possible criteria, each shows when $R=S^2$. The first criterion: There exist $x,y \in S$ such that $xy-yx \neq 0$ and $xSy \subseteq S^2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $S^2=R$. The second criterion: There exist $x,y \in S$ such that $xy+yx \neq 0$ and $xKy \subseteq S^2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $S^2=R$. Actually, those results are true without any restriction on the dimension of $R$ over $Z(R)$. In the special case of matrices (with the transpose involution and with the symplectic involution) over a field of characteristic not equal to 2, it is not difficult to find, for example, $x,y \in S$ such that $xy-yx \neq 0$ and for every $s \in S$, $xsy \in S^2$. Therefore, proving Herstein's remark that for matrices the answer is known to be positive. Similar results for $K^6$, $K^4$, $K+KSK$, $KS+K^2$, $SKS$ and $S^2K$ can also be found.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.