BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ting Ye

Ting Ye contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsArtificial Intelligencemath.STStatistics TheoryComputer Visioncs.CYInformation RetrievalMachine Learningphysics.chem-phPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Bayesian Approach for Selecting Relevant External Data (BASE): Application to a study of Long-Term Outcomes in a Hemophilia Gene Therapy Trial

Gene therapies aim to address the root causes of diseases, particularly those stemming from rare genetic defects that can be life-threatening or severely debilitating. Although an increasing number of gene therapies have received regulatory approvals in recent years, understanding their long-term efficacy in trials with limited follow-up time remains challenging. To address this critical question, we propose a novel Bayesian framework designed to selectively integrate relevant external data with internal trial data to improve the inference of the durability of long-term efficacy. We proved that the proposed method has desired theoretical properties, such as identifying and favoring external subsets deemed relevant, where the relevance is defined as the similarity, induced by the marginal likelihood, between the generating mechanisms of the internal data and the selected external data. We also conducted comprehensive simulations to evaluate its performance under various scenarios. Furthermore, we apply this method to predict and infer the endogenous factor IX (FIX) levels of patients who receive Etranacogene dezaparvovec over the long-term. Our estimated long-term FIX levels, validated by recent trial data, indicate that Etranacogene dezaparvovec induces sustained FIX production. Together, the theoretical findings, simulation results, and successful application of this framework underscore its potential to address similar long-term effectiveness estimation and inference questions in real world applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

ICPO: Intrinsic Confidence-Driven Group Relative Preference Optimization for Efficient Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) demonstrates significant potential in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing RLVR methods are often constrained by issues such as coarse-grained rewards, reward noise, and inefficient exploration, which lead to unstable training and entropy collapse. To address this challenge, we propose the Intrinsic Confidence-Driven Group Relative Preference Optimization method (ICPO). The intuition behind it lies in the fact that the probabilities of an LLM generating different responses can inherently and directly reflect its self-assessment of the reasoning process. Inspired by the idea of preference modeling, ICPO calculates a preference advantage score for each response by comparing the relative generation probabilities of multiple responses under the same input prompt, and integrates this score with verifiable rewards to guide the exploration process. We have discovered that the preference advantage score not only alleviates the issues of coarse-grained rewards and reward noise but also effectively curbs overconfident errors, enhances the relative superiority of undervalued high-quality responses, and prevents the model from overfitting to specific strategies. Comprehensive experiments across four general-domain benchmarks and three mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that ICPO steadily boosts reasoning compared to GRPO.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Covariate-Adjusted Log-Rank Test: Guaranteed Efficiency Gain and Universal Applicability

Nonparametric covariate adjustment is considered for log-rank type tests of treatment effect with right-censored time-to-event data from clinical trials applying covariate-adaptive randomization. Our proposed covariate-adjusted log-rank test has a simple explicit formula and a guaranteed efficiency gain over the unadjusted test. We also show that our proposed test achieves universal applicability in the sense that the same formula of test can be universally applied to simple randomization and all commonly used covariate-adaptive randomization schemes such as the stratified permuted block and Pocock and Simon's minimization, which is not a property enjoyed by the unadjusted log-rank test. Our method is supported by novel asymptotic theory and empirical results for type I error and power of tests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Focusing Framework for Testing Bi-Directional Causal Effects with GWAS Summary Data

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful method that uses genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to infer the causal effect of a modifiable exposure on an outcome. Although recent years have seen many extensions of basic MR methods to be robust to certain violations of assumptions, few methods were proposed to infer bi-directional causal relationships, especially for phenotypes with limited biological understandings. The presence of horizontal pleiotropy adds another layer of complexity. In this article, we show that assumptions for common MR methods are often impossible or too stringent in the existence of bi-directional relationships. We then propose a new focusing framework for testing bi-directional causal effects between two traits with possibly pleiotropic genetic variants. Our proposal can be coupled with many state-of-art MR methods. We provide theoretical guarantees on the Type I error and power of the proposed methods. We demonstrate the robustness of the proposed methods using several simulated and real datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

FIFA: Making Fairness More Generalizable in Classifiers Trained on Imbalanced Data

Algorithmic fairness plays an important role in machine learning and imposing fairness constraints during learning is a common approach. However, many datasets are imbalanced in certain label classes (e.g. "healthy") and sensitive subgroups (e.g. "older patients"). Empirically, this imbalance leads to a lack of generalizability not only of classification, but also of fairness properties, especially in over-parameterized models. For example, fairness-aware training may ensure equalized odds (EO) on the training data, but EO is far from being satisfied on new users. In this paper, we propose a theoretically-principled, yet Flexible approach that is Imbalance-Fairness-Aware (FIFA). Specifically, FIFA encourages both classification and fairness generalization and can be flexibly combined with many existing fair learning methods with logits-based losses. While our main focus is on EO, FIFA can be directly applied to achieve equalized opportunity (EqOpt); and under certain conditions, it can also be applied to other fairness notions. We demonstrate the power of FIFA by combining it with a popular fair classification algorithm, and the resulting algorithm achieves significantly better fairness generalization on several real-world datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Nonparametric identification of causal effects in clustered observational studies with differential selection

The clustered observational study (COS) design is the observational study counterpart to the clustered randomized trial. In a COS, a treatment is assigned to intact groups, and all units within the group are exposed to the treatment. However, the treatment is non-randomly assigned. COSs are common in both education and health services research. In education, treatments may be given to all students within some schools but withheld from all students in other schools. In health studies, treatments may be applied to clusters such as hospitals or groups of patients treated by the same physician. In this manuscript, we study the identification of causal effects in clustered observational study designs. We focus on the prospect of differential selection of units to clusters, which occurs when the units' cluster selections depend on the clusters' treatment assignments. Extant work on COSs has made an implicit assumption that rules out the presence of differential selection. We derive the identification results for designs with differential selection and that contexts with differential cluster selection require different adjustment sets than standard designs. We outline estimators for designs with and without differential selection. Using a series of simulations, we outline the magnitude of the bias that can occur with differential selection. We then present two empirical applications focusing on the likelihood of differential selection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Testing for Treatment Effect Twice Using Internal and External Controls in Clinical Trials

Leveraging external controls -- relevant individual patient data under control from external trials or real-world data -- has the potential to reduce the cost of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while increasing the proportion of trial patients given access to novel treatments. However, due to lack of randomization, RCT patients and external controls may differ with respect to covariates that may or may not have been measured. Hence, after controlling for measured covariates, for instance by matching, testing for treatment effect using external controls may still be subject to unmeasured biases. In this paper, we propose a sensitivity analysis approach to quantify the magnitude of unmeasured bias that would be needed to alter the study conclusion that presumed no unmeasured biases are introduced by employing external controls. Whether leveraging external controls increases power or not depends on the interplay between sample sizes and the magnitude of treatment effect and unmeasured biases, which may be difficult to anticipate. This motivates a combined testing procedure that performs two highly correlated analyses, one with and one without external controls, with a small correction for multiple testing using the joint distribution of the two test statistics. The combined test provides a new method of sensitivity analysis designed for data fusion problems, which anchors at the unbiased analysis based on RCT only and spends a small proportion of the type I error to also test using the external controls. In this way, if leveraging external controls increases power, the power gain compared to the analysis based on RCT only can be substantial; if not, the power loss is small. The proposed method is evaluated in theory and power calculations, and applied to a real trial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Role of Placebo Samples in Observational Studies

In an observational study, it is common to leverage known null effect to detect bias. One such strategy is to set aside a placebo sample -- a subset of data immune from the hypothesized cause-and-effect relationship. Existence of an effect in the placebo sample raises concern of unmeasured confounding bias while absence of it corroborates the causal conclusion. This paper establishes a formal framework for using a placebo sample to detect and remove bias. We state identification assumption, and develop estimation and inference methods based on outcome regression, inverse probability weighting, and doubly-robust approaches. Simulation studies and an empirical application illustrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Enforced freedom: electric-field-induced declustering of ionic-liquid ions in the double layer

Whereas the majority of ions in the bulk of a solvent-free ionic liquid is bound into clusters, this is expected to change in the electrical double layer (EDL), in which the resulting electric field 'prefers' to interact with electrical monopoles-free, unclustered ions. The competition between the propensity of ions to stay in a clustered state and the reduction of the energy of ions in electric field in the free state determines the resulting portion of free ions in the EDL. We present a study of this effect, based on the simplest possible mean-field theory. 'Cracking' of ion clusters into individual ions in electric field is accompanied by the change of the dielectric response of ionic liquid which is different in clustered and unclustered states. The predictions of the theory are verified and further explored by specially performed molecular dynamics simulations. A particular finding of the theory is that the differential capacitance vs potential curve displays a bell shape despite low concentration of free charge carriers, because the dielectric response of bound ions reduces the threshold concentration of the bell- to camel-shape transition. Whereas qualitatively these findings make perfect sense, in reality the exact numbers and criteria might be different as the presented simple theory does not take into account overscreening and oscillating charge and electrostatic potential distributions near the electrode. This is why testing the theory with computer simulations is essential, but the latter basically reproduce the qualitative conclusions of the theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Inference on Average Treatment Effect under Minimization and Other Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Methods

Covariate-adaptive randomization schemes such as the minimization and stratified permuted blocks are often applied in clinical trials to balance treatment assignments across prognostic factors. The existing theoretical developments on inference after covariate-adaptive randomization are mostly limited to situations where a correct model between the response and covariates can be specified or the randomization method has well-understood properties. Based on stratification with covariate levels utilized in randomization and a further adjusting for covariates not used in randomization, in this article we propose several estimators for model free inference on average treatment effect defined as the difference between response means under two treatments. We establish asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators under all popular covariate-adaptive randomization schemes including the minimization whose theoretical property is unclear, and we show that the asymptotic distributions are invariant with respect to covariate-adaptive randomization methods. Consistent variance estimators are constructed for asymptotic inference. Asymptotic relative efficiencies and finite sample properties of estimators are also studied. We recommend using one of our proposed estimators for valid and model free inference after covariate-adaptive randomization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Protocol for an Observational Study on the Effects of Social Distancing on Influenza-Like Illness and COVID-19

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious respiratory disease that was first detected in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and has since spread around the globe, claiming more than 69,000 lives by the time this protocol is written. It has been widely acknowledged that the most effective public policy to mitigate the pandemic is \emph{social and physical distancing}: keeping at least six feet away from people, working from home, closing non-essential businesses, etc. There have been a lot of anecdotal evidences suggesting that social distancing has a causal effect on disease mitigation; however, few studies have investigated the effect of social distancing on disease mitigation in a transparent and statistically-sound manner. We propose to perform an optimal non-bipartite matching to pair counties with similar observed covariates but vastly different average social distancing scores during the first week (March 16th through Match 22nd) of President's \emph{15 Days to Slow the Spread} campaign. We have produced a total of $302$ pairs of two U.S. counties with good covariate balance on a total of $16$ important variables. Our primary outcome will be the average observed illness collected by Kinsa Inc. two weeks after the intervention period. Although the observed illness does not directly measure COVID-19, it reflects a real-time aspect of the pandemic, and unlike confirmed cases, it is much less confounded by counties' testing capabilities. We also consider observed illness three weeks after the intervention period as a secondary outcome. We will test a proportional treatment effect using a randomization-based test with covariance adjustment and conduct a sensitivity analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Robust Tests for Treatment Effect in Survival Analysis under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

Covariate-adaptive randomization is popular in clinical trials with sequentially arrived patients for balancing treatment assignments across prognostic factors which may have influence on the response. However, existing theory on tests for treatment effect under covariate-adaptive randomization is limited to tests under linear or generalized linear models, although covariate-adaptive randomization has been used in survival analysis for a long time and its main application is in survival analysis. Often times, practitioners would simply adopt a conventional test such as the log-rank test or score test to compare two treatments, which is controversial since tests derived under simple randomization may not be valid under other randomization schemes. In this article, we prove that the log-rank test valid under simple randomization is conservative in terms of type I error under covariate-adaptive randomization, and the robust score test developed under simple randomization is no longer robust under covariate-adaptive randomization. We then propose a calibration type log-rank or score test that is valid and robust under both simple randomization and a large family of covariate-adaptive randomization schemes. Furthermore, we obtain Pitman's efficacy of log-rank and score tests to compare their asymptotic relative efficiency. Simulation studies about the type I error and power of various tests are presented under several popular randomization schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access