Paper detail

A Bayesian Approach for Selecting Relevant External Data (BASE): Application to a study of Long-Term Outcomes in a Hemophilia Gene Therapy Trial

Gene therapies aim to address the root causes of diseases, particularly those stemming from rare genetic defects that can be life-threatening or severely debilitating. Although an increasing number of gene therapies have received regulatory approvals in recent years, understanding their long-term efficacy in trials with limited follow-up time remains challenging. To address this critical question, we propose a novel Bayesian framework designed to selectively integrate relevant external data with internal trial data to improve the inference of the durability of long-term efficacy. We proved that the proposed method has desired theoretical properties, such as identifying and favoring external subsets deemed relevant, where the relevance is defined as the similarity, induced by the marginal likelihood, between the generating mechanisms of the internal data and the selected external data. We also conducted comprehensive simulations to evaluate its performance under various scenarios. Furthermore, we apply this method to predict and infer the endogenous factor IX (FIX) levels of patients who receive Etranacogene dezaparvovec over the long-term. Our estimated long-term FIX levels, validated by recent trial data, indicate that Etranacogene dezaparvovec induces sustained FIX production. Together, the theoretical findings, simulation results, and successful application of this framework underscore its potential to address similar long-term effectiveness estimation and inference questions in real world applications.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.