Source author record

Tian-hong Wang

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

6works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

6 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Relativistic calculations of R(D(∗))R(D^{(*)}), R(Ds(∗))R(D^{(*)}_s), R(ηc)R(η_c) and R(J/ψ)R(J/ψ)

Recently, the deviation of the ratios R(D)R(D), R(D∗)R(D^{*}) and R(J/ψ)R(J/ψ) have been found between experimental data and the Standard Model predictions, which may be the hint of New Physics. In this work, we calculate these ratios within the Standard Model by using the improved instantaneous Bethe-Salpeter method. The emphasis is pad to the relativistic correction of the form factors. The results are R(D)=0.312−0.007+0.006R(D)=0.312 ^{+0.006}_{-0.007}, R(D∗)=0.249−0.002+0.001R(D^*)= 0.249^{+0.001}_{-0.002}, R(Ds)=0.320−0.009+0.009R(D_s)=0.320 ^{+0.009}_{-0.009}, R(Ds∗)=0.251−0.003+0.002R(D^*_s)=0.251 ^{+0.002}_{-0.003}, R(ηc)=0.384−0.042+0.032R(η_c)=0.384 ^{+0.032}_{-0.042}, and R(J/ψ)=0.267−0.011+0.009R(J/ψ)=0.267 ^{+0.009}_{-0.011}, which are consistent with predictions of other models and the experimental data. The semileptonic decay rates and corresponding form factors at zero recoil are also given.

preprint2020arXiv

The weak decay BcB_c to Z(3930)Z(3930) and X(4160)X(4160) by Bethe-Salpeter method

Considering Z(3930)Z(3930) and X(4160)X(4160) as χc2(2P)χ_{c2}(2P) and χc2(3P)χ_{c2}(3P) states, the semileptonic and nonleptonic of BcB_c decays to Z(3930)Z(3930) and X(4160)X(4160) are studied by the improved Bethe-Salpeter(B-S) Method. The form factors of decay are calculated through the overlap integrals of the meson wave functions in the whole accessible kinematical range. The influence of relativistic corrections are considered in the exclusive decays. Branching ratios of BcB_c weak decays to Z(3930)Z(3930) and X(4160)X(4160) are predicted. Some of the branching ratios are: Br(Bc+→Z(3930)e+νe)Br(B_c^+\to Z(3930)e^+ν_e)=(3.03−0.16+0.09)×10−4=(3.03^{+0.09}_{-0.16})\times 10^{-4} and Br(Bc+→X(4160)e+νe)Br(B_c^+\to X(4160)e^+ν_e)=(3.55−0.35+0.83)×10−6=(3.55^{+0.83}_{-0.35})\times 10^{-6}. These results may provide useful information to discover Z(3930)Z(3930) and X(4160)X(4160) and the necessary information for the phenomenological study of BcB_c physics.

preprint2016arXiv

The Production of X(3940)X(3940) and X(4160)X(4160) in BcB_c decays

Considering X(3940)X(3940) and X(4160)X(4160) as ηc(3S)η_c(3S) and ηc(4S)η_c(4S), we study the productions of X(3940)X(3940) and X(4160)X(4160) in exclusive weak decays of BcB_c meson by the improved Bethe-Salpeter(B-S) Method. Using the relativistic B-S equation and Mandelstam formalism, we calculate the corresponding decay form factors. The predictions of the corresponding branching ratios are: Br(Bc+→X(3940)e+νe)Br(B_c^+\to X(3940)e^+ν_e)=1.0×10−4=1.0\times10^{-4} and Br(Bc+→X(4160)e+νe)=2.4×10−5Br(B_c^+\to X(4160)e^+ν_e)=2.4\times10^{-5}. That will provide us a new way to observe the X(3940)X(3940) and X(4160)X(4160) in the future, as well as to improve the knowledge of BcB_c meson decay.

preprint2014arXiv

The Study of Rare Bc→Ds,d(∗)llˉB_c\rightarrow D^{(*)}_{s,d}l\bar{l} Decays

In this paper, we study rare decays Bc→Ds,d(∗)llˉB_c\rightarrow D^{(*)}_{s,d}l\bar{l} within the Standard Model. The penguin, box, annihilation, color-favored cascade and color-suppressed cascade contributions are included. Based on our calculation, the annihilation and color-favored cascade diagrams play important roles in the differential branching fractions, forward-backward asymmetries, longitudinal polarizations of the final vector mesons and leptonic longitudinal polarization asymmetries. More importantly, color-favored cascade decays largely enhance the resonance cascade contributions. To avoid the resonance cascade contribution pollution, new cutting regions are put forward.

preprint2012arXiv

The Productions and Strong Decays of Dq(2S)D_q(2S) and Bq(2S)B_q(2S)

We study the productions of first radial excited states Dq(2S)D_q(2S) (q=u,d,sq=u, d, s) and Bq(2S)B_q(2S) in exclusive semi-leptonic Bq′B_{q'} (q′=u,ds,cq'=u, d s, c) decays by the improved Bethe-Salpeter method. These 2S states can be detected through their strong decays to ground mesons, where the strong decays are calculated by the low energy approximation as well as the impulse approximation. Some channels have ratios of order 10−410^{-4}: Br(B+→Dˉ0(2S)ℓ+νℓ)×Br(Dˉ0(2S)→Dˉ∗π)≈(4.9±4.0)×10−4Br(B^+\to\bar D^0(2S)\ell^+{ν_\ell})\times Br(\bar D^0(2S)\to \bar D^{*}π)\approx(4.9\pm4.0)\times10^{-4}, Br(B0→D−(2S)ℓ+νℓ)×Br(D−(2S)→Dˉ∗π)≈(4.4±3.4)×10−4Br(B^0\to D^-(2S)\ell^+{ν_\ell})\times Br(D^-(2S)\to \bar D^{*}π)\approx(4.4\pm3.4)\times10^{-4}. These channels could be measured by the current B-factories. For Ds(2S)D_s(2S), we also obtain a relative large ratio: Br(Bs0→Ds−(2S)ℓ+νℓ)×Br(Ds−(2S)→Dˉ∗Kˉ)≈(9.9±14.9)×10−4Br(B_s^0\to D_s^-(2S)\ell^+{ν_\ell})\times Br(D_s^-(2S)\to \bar D^{*}\bar K)\approx (9.9\pm14.9)\times10^{-4}. Although there are discrepancies of the full decay width between the theoretical predictions of D0(2S){D}^0(2S) and experimental results of D(2550)0D(2550)^0, the new detected state D(2550)0D(2550)^0 is very likely the D0(2S){D}^0(2S) state.

preprint2011arXiv

Radiative E1 decays of X(3872)

Radiative E1 decay widths of X(3872)\rm X(3872) are calculated through the relativistic Salpeter method, with the assumption that X(3872)\rm X(3872) is the χc1χ_{c1}(2P) state, which is the radial excited state of χc1χ_{c1}(1P). We firstly calculated the E1 decay width of χc1χ_{c1}(1P), the result is in agreement with experimental data excellently, then we calculated the case of X(3872)\rm X(3872) with the assignment that it is χc1χ_{c1}(2P). Results are: $Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γ\sl J/ψ)=33.0$ keV, Γ(X(3872)→γψ(2S))=146Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γψ(2S))=146 keV and Γ(X(3872)→γψ(3770))=7.09Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γψ(3770))=7.09 keV. The ratio ${{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrowγψ(2{\rm S}))}/{{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrow γ{\sl J}/ψ)}=4.4$ agrees with experimental data by BaBar, but larger than the new up-bound reported by Belle recently. With the same method, we also predict the decay widths: Γ(χb1(1P))→γΥ(1S))=30.0Γ(χ_{b1}(1\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(1\rm S))=30.0 keV, Γ(χb1(2P))→γΥ(1S))=5.65Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(1\rm S))=5.65 keV and Γ(χb1(2P))→γΥ(2S))=15.8Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(2S))=15.8 keV, and the full widths: Γ(χb1(1P))∼85.7Γ(χ_{b1}(1\rm P))\sim 85.7 keV, Γ(χb1(2P))∼66.5Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\sim 66.5 keV.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.