Paper detail

Radiative E1 decays of X(3872)

Radiative E1 decay widths of $\rm X(3872)$ are calculated through the relativistic Salpeter method, with the assumption that $\rm X(3872)$ is the $χ_{c1}$(2P) state, which is the radial excited state of $χ_{c1}$(1P). We firstly calculated the E1 decay width of $χ_{c1}$(1P), the result is in agreement with experimental data excellently, then we calculated the case of $\rm X(3872)$ with the assignment that it is $χ_{c1}$(2P). Results are: $Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γ\sl J/ψ)=33.0$ keV, $Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γψ(2S))=146$ keV and $Γ({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow γψ(3770))=7.09$ keV. The ratio ${{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrowγψ(2{\rm S}))}/{{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrow γ{\sl J}/ψ)}=4.4$ agrees with experimental data by BaBar, but larger than the new up-bound reported by Belle recently. With the same method, we also predict the decay widths: $Γ(χ_{b1}(1\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(1\rm S))=30.0$ keV, $Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(1\rm S))=5.65$ keV and $Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow γΥ(2S))=15.8$ keV, and the full widths: $Γ(χ_{b1}(1\rm P))\sim 85.7$ keV, $Γ(χ_{b1}(2\rm P))\sim 66.5$ keV.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.