BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Theodor Misiakiewicz

Theodor Misiakiewicz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Learning with convolution and pooling operations in kernel methods

Recent empirical work has shown that hierarchical convolutional kernels inspired by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) significantly improve the performance of kernel methods in image classification tasks. A widely accepted explanation for their success is that these architectures encode hypothesis classes that are suitable for natural images. However, understanding the precise interplay between approximation and generalization in convolutional architectures remains a challenge. In this paper, we consider the stylized setting of covariates (image pixels) uniformly distributed on the hypercube, and characterize exactly the RKHS of kernels composed of single layers of convolution, pooling, and downsampling operations. We use this characterization to compute sharp asymptotics of the generalization error for any given function in high-dimension. In particular, we quantify the gain in sample complexity brought by enforcing locality with the convolution operation and approximate translation invariance with average pooling. Notably, these results provide a precise description of how convolution and pooling operations trade off approximation with generalization power in one layer convolutional kernels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Spectrum of inner-product kernel matrices in the polynomial regime and multiple descent phenomenon in kernel ridge regression

We study the spectrum of inner-product kernel matrices, i.e., $n \times n$ matrices with entries $h (\langle \textbf{x}_i ,\textbf{x}_j \rangle/d)$ where the $( \textbf{x}_i)_{i \leq n}$ are i.i.d.~random covariates in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In the linear high-dimensional regime $n \asymp d$, it was shown that these matrices are well approximated by their linearization, which simplifies into the sum of a rescaled Wishart matrix and identity matrix. In this paper, we generalize this decomposition to the polynomial high-dimensional regime $n \asymp d^\ell,\ell \in \mathbb{N}$, for data uniformly distributed on the sphere and hypercube. In this regime, the kernel matrix is well approximated by its degree-$\ell$ polynomial approximation and can be decomposed into a low-rank spike matrix, identity and a `Gegenbauer matrix' with entries $Q_\ell (\langle \textbf{x}_i , \textbf{x}_j \rangle)$, where $Q_\ell$ is the degree-$\ell$ Gegenbauer polynomial. We show that the spectrum of the Gegenbauer matrix converges in distribution to a Marchenko-Pastur law. This problem is motivated by the study of the prediction error of kernel ridge regression (KRR) in the polynomial regime $n \asymp d^κ, κ>0$. Previous work showed that for $κ\not\in \mathbb{N}$, KRR fits exactly a degree-$\lfloor κ\rfloor$ polynomial approximation to the target function. In this paper, we use our characterization of the kernel matrix to complete this picture and compute the precise asymptotics of the test error in the limit $n/d^κ\to ψ$ with $κ\in \mathbb{N}$. In this case, the test error can present a double descent behavior, depending on the effective regularization and signal-to-noise ratio at level $κ$. Because this double descent can occur each time $κ$ crosses an integer, this explains the multiple descent phenomenon in the KRR risk curve observed in several previous works.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentration

Consider the classical supervised learning problem: we are given data $(y_i,{\boldsymbol x}_i)$, $i\le n$, with $y_i$ a response and ${\boldsymbol x}_i\in {\mathcal X}$ a covariates vector, and try to learn a model $f:{\mathcal X}\to{\mathbb R}$ to predict future responses. Random features methods map the covariates vector ${\boldsymbol x}_i$ to a point ${\boldsymbol ϕ}({\boldsymbol x}_i)$ in a higher dimensional space ${\mathbb R}^N$, via a random featurization map ${\boldsymbol ϕ}$. We study the use of random features methods in conjunction with ridge regression in the feature space ${\mathbb R}^N$. This can be viewed as a finite-dimensional approximation of kernel ridge regression (KRR), or as a stylized model for neural networks in the so called lazy training regime. We define a class of problems satisfying certain spectral conditions on the underlying kernels, and a hypercontractivity assumption on the associated eigenfunctions. These conditions are verified by classical high-dimensional examples. Under these conditions, we prove a sharp characterization of the error of random features ridge regression. In particular, we address two fundamental questions: $(1)$~What is the generalization error of KRR? $(2)$~How big $N$ should be for the random features approximation to achieve the same error as KRR? In this setting, we prove that KRR is well approximated by a projection onto the top $\ell$ eigenfunctions of the kernel, where $\ell$ depends on the sample size $n$. We show that the test error of random features ridge regression is dominated by its approximation error and is larger than the error of KRR as long as $N\le n^{1-δ}$ for some $δ>0$. We characterize this gap. For $N\ge n^{1+δ}$, random features achieve the same error as the corresponding KRR, and further increasing $N$ does not lead to a significant change in test error.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Learning with invariances in random features and kernel models

A number of machine learning tasks entail a high degree of invariance: the data distribution does not change if we act on the data with a certain group of transformations. For instance, labels of images are invariant under translations of the images. Certain neural network architectures -- for instance, convolutional networks -- are believed to owe their success to the fact that they exploit such invariance properties. With the objective of quantifying the gain achieved by invariant architectures, we introduce two classes of models: invariant random features and invariant kernel methods. The latter includes, as a special case, the neural tangent kernel for convolutional networks with global average pooling. We consider uniform covariates distributions on the sphere and hypercube and a general invariant target function. We characterize the test error of invariant methods in a high-dimensional regime in which the sample size and number of hidden units scale as polynomials in the dimension, for a class of groups that we call `degeneracy $α$', with $α\leq 1$. We show that exploiting invariance in the architecture saves a $d^α$ factor ($d$ stands for the dimension) in sample size and number of hidden units to achieve the same test error as for unstructured architectures. Finally, we show that output symmetrization of an unstructured kernel estimator does not give a significant statistical improvement; on the other hand, data augmentation with an unstructured kernel estimator is equivalent to an invariant kernel estimator and enjoys the same improvement in statistical efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?

For a certain scaling of the initialization of stochastic gradient descent (SGD), wide neural networks (NN) have been shown to be well approximated by reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) methods. Recent empirical work showed that, for some classification tasks, RKHS methods can replace NNs without a large loss in performance. On the other hand, two-layers NNs are known to encode richer smoothness classes than RKHS and we know of special examples for which SGD-trained NN provably outperform RKHS. This is true even in the wide network limit, for a different scaling of the initialization. How can we reconcile the above claims? For which tasks do NNs outperform RKHS? If covariates are nearly isotropic, RKHS methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality, while NNs can overcome it by learning the best low-dimensional representation. Here we show that this curse of dimensionality becomes milder if the covariates display the same low-dimensional structure as the target function, and we precisely characterize this tradeoff. Building on these results, we present the spiked covariates model that can capture in a unified framework both behaviors observed in earlier work. We hypothesize that such a latent low-dimensional structure is present in image classification. We test numerically this hypothesis by showing that specific perturbations of the training distribution degrade the performances of RKHS methods much more significantly than NNs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimension

We consider the problem of learning an unknown function $f_{\star}$ on the $d$-dimensional sphere with respect to the square loss, given i.i.d. samples $\{(y_i,{\boldsymbol x}_i)\}_{i\le n}$ where ${\boldsymbol x}_i$ is a feature vector uniformly distributed on the sphere and $y_i=f_{\star}({\boldsymbol x}_i)+\varepsilon_i$. We study two popular classes of models that can be regarded as linearizations of two-layers neural networks around a random initialization: the random features model of Rahimi-Recht (RF); the neural tangent kernel model of Jacot-Gabriel-Hongler (NT). Both these approaches can also be regarded as randomized approximations of kernel ridge regression (with respect to different kernels), and enjoy universal approximation properties when the number of neurons $N$ diverges, for a fixed dimension $d$. We consider two specific regimes: the approximation-limited regime, in which $n=\infty$ while $d$ and $N$ are large but finite; and the sample size-limited regime in which $N=\infty$ while $d$ and $n$ are large but finite. In the first regime we prove that if $d^{\ell + δ} \le N\le d^{\ell+1-δ}$ for small $δ> 0$, then \RF\, effectively fits a degree-$\ell$ polynomial in the raw features, and \NT\, fits a degree-$(\ell+1)$ polynomial. In the second regime, both RF and NT reduce to kernel methods with rotationally invariant kernels. We prove that, if the number of samples is $d^{\ell + δ} \le n \le d^{\ell +1-δ}$, then kernel methods can fit at most a a degree-$\ell$ polynomial in the raw features. This lower bound is achieved by kernel ridge regression. Optimal prediction error is achieved for vanishing ridge regularization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access