BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shmuel Weinberger

Shmuel Weinberger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.ATmath.GTmath.DGmath.KTmath.OARobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fixed Point Sets and the Fundamental Group I: Semi-free Actions on G-CW-Complexes

Smith theory says that the fixed point of a semi-free action of a group $G$ on a contractible space is ${\bb Z}_p$-acyclic for any prime factor $p$ of $G$. Jones proved the converse of Smith theory for the case $G$ is a cyclic group acting on finite CW-complexes. We extend the theory to semi-free group action on finite CW-complexes of given homotopy type, in various settings. In particular, the converse of Smith theory holds if and only if certain $K$-theoretical obstruction vanishes. We also give some examples that show the effects of different types of the $K$-theoretical obstruction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parametrized motion planning and topological complexity

In this paper we study paramertized motion planning algorithms which provide universal and flexible solutions to diverse motion planning problems. Such algorithms are intended to function under a variety of external conditions which are viewed as parameters and serve as part of the input of the algorithm. Continuing a recent paper, we study further the concept of parametrized topological complexity. We analyse in full detail the problem of controlling a swarm of robots in the presence of multiple obstacles in Euclidean space which served for us a natural motivating example. We present an explicit parametrized motion planning algorithm solving the motion planning problem for any number of robots and obstacles.. This algorithm is optimal, it has minimal possible topological complexity for any d odd. Besides, we describe a modification of this algorithm which is optimal for d even. We also analyse the parametrized topological complexity of sphere bundles using the Stiefel - Whitney characteristic classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parametrized topological complexity of sphere bundles

Parametrized motion planning algorithms have high degree of flexibility and universality, they can work under a variety of external conditions, which are viewed as parameters and form part of the input of the algorithm. In this paper we analyse the parameterized motion planning problem in the case of sphere bundles. Our main results provide upper and lower bounds for the parametrized topological complexity; the upper bounds typically involve sectional categories of the associated fibrations and the lower bounds are given in terms of characteristic classes and their properties. We explicitly compute the parametrized topological complexity in many examples and show that it may assume arbitrarily large values.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Additivity of higher rho invariants and nonrigidity of topological manifolds

Let $X$ be a closed oriented connected topological manifold of dimension $n\geq 5$. The structure group of $X$ is the abelian group of equivalence classes of all pairs $(f, M)$ such that $M$ is a closed oriented manifold and $f\colon M \to X$ is an orientation-preserving homotopy equivalence. The main purpose of this article is to prove that a higher rho invariant defines a group homomorphism from the topological structure group of $X$ to the $C^*$-algebraic structure group of $X$. In fact, we introduce a higher rho invariant map on the homology manifold structure group of a closed oriented connected $\textit{topological}$ manifold, and prove its additivity. This higher rho invariant map restricts to the higher rho invariant map on the topological structure group. More generally, the same techniques developed in this paper can be applied to define a higher rho invariant map on the homology manifold structure group of a closed oriented connected $\textit{homology}$ manifold. As an application, we use the additivity of the higher rho invariant map to study non-rigidity of topological manifolds. More precisely, we give a lower bound for the free rank of the $\textit{algebraically reduced}$ structure group of $X$ by the number of torsion elements in $π_1 X$. Here the algebraic reduced structure group of $X$ is the quotient of the topological structure group of $X$ modulo a certain action of self-homotopy equivalences of $X$. We also introduce a notion of homological higher rho invariant, which can be used to detect many elements in the structure group of a closed oriented topological manifold, even when the fundamental group of the manifold is torsion free. In particular, we apply this homological higher rho invariant to show that the structure group is not finitely generated for a class of manifolds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Quantitative nullhomotopy and rational homotopy type

In \cite{GrOrang}, Gromov asks the following question: given a nullhomotopic map $f:S^m \to S^n$ of Lipschitz constant $L$, how does the Lipschitz constant of an optimal nullhomotopy of $f$ depend on $L$, $m$, and $n$? We establish that for fixed $m$ and $n$, the answer is at worst quadratic in $L$. More precisely, we construct a nullhomotopy whose \emph{thickness} (Lipschitz constant in the space variable) is $C(m,n)(L+1)$ and whose \emph{width} (Lipschitz constant in the time variable) is $C(m,n)(L+1)^2$. More generally, we prove a similar result for maps $f:X \to Y$ for any compact Riemannian manifold $X$ and $Y$ a compact simply connected Riemannian manifold in a class which includes complex projective spaces, Grassmannians, and all other simply connected homogeneous spaces. Moreover, for all simply connected $Y$, asymptotic restrictions on the size of nullhomotopies are determined by rational homotopy type.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Quantitative null-cobordism

For a given null-cobordant Riemannian $n$-manifold, how does the minimal geometric complexity of a null-cobordism depend on the geometric complexity of the manifold? In [Gro99], Gromov conjectured that this dependence should be linear. We show that it is at most a polynomial whose degree depends on $n$. This construction relies on another of independent interest. Take $X$ and $Y$ to be sufficiently nice compact metric spaces, such as Riemannian manifolds or simplicial complexes. Suppose $Y$ is simply connected and rationally homotopy equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces: for example, any simply connected Lie group. Then two homotopic L-Lipschitz maps $f, g : X \rightarrow Y$ are homotopic via a $CL$-Lipschitz homotopy. We present a counterexample to show that this is not true for larger classes of spaces $Y$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access