BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shay Kutten

Shay Kutten contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Locally Restricted Proof Labeling Schemes (Full Version)

Introduced by Korman, Kutten, and Peleg (PODC 2005), a proof labeling scheme (PLS) is a distributed verification system dedicated to evaluating if a given configured graph satisfies a certain property. It involves a centralized prover, whose role is to provide proof that a given configured graph is a yes-instance by means of assigning labels to the nodes, and a distributed verifier, whose role is to verify the validity of the given proof via local access to the assigned labels. In this paper, we introduce the notion of a locally restricted PLS in which the prover's power is restricted to that of a LOCAL algorithm with a polylogarithmic number of rounds. To circumvent inherent impossibilities of PLSs in the locally restricted setting, we turn to models that relax the correctness requirements by allowing the verifier to accept some no-instances as long as they are not "too far" from satisfying the property in question. To this end, we evaluate (1) distributed graph optimization problems (OptDGPs) based on the notion of an approximate proof labeling scheme (APLS) (analogous to the type of relaxation used in sequential approximation algorithms); and (2) configured graph families (CGFs) based on the notion of atesting proof labeling schemes (TPLS) (analogous to the type of relaxation used in property testing algorithms).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Communication Efficient Self-Stabilizing Leader Election (Full Version)

This paper presents a randomized self-stabilizing algorithm that elects a leader $r$ in a general $n$-node undirected graph and constructs a spanning tree $T$ rooted at $r$. The algorithm works under the synchronous message passing network model, assuming that the nodes know a linear upper bound on $n$ and that each edge has a unique ID known to both its endpoints (or, alternatively, assuming the $KT_{1}$ model). The highlight of this algorithm is its superior communication efficiency: It is guaranteed to send a total of $\tilde{O} (n)$ messages, each of constant size, till stabilization, while stabilizing in $\tilde{O} (n)$ rounds, in expectation and with high probability. After stabilization, the algorithm sends at most one constant size message per round while communicating only over the ($n - 1$) edges of $T$. In all these aspects, the communication overhead of the new algorithm is far smaller than that of the existing (mostly deterministic) self-stabilizing leader election algorithms. The algorithm is relatively simple and relies mostly on known modules that are common in the fault free leader election literature; these modules are enhanced in various subtle ways in order to assemble them into a communication efficient self-stabilizing algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Multicast Communications in Tree Networks with Heterogeneous Capacity Constraints

A widely studied problem in communication networks is that of finding the maximum number of communication requests that can be scheduled concurrently, subject to node and/or link capacity constraints. In this paper, we consider the problem of finding the largest number of multicast communication requests that can be serviced simultaneously by a network of tree topology, subject to heterogeneous capacity constraints. This problem generalizes the following two problems studied in the literature: a) the problem of finding a largest induced $k$-colorable subgraph of a chordal graph, b) the maximum multi-commodity flow problem in tree networks. The problem is already known to be NP-hard and to admit a $c$-approximation ($c \approx 1.58$) in the case of homogeneous capacity constraints. We first show that the problem is much harder to approximate in the heterogeneous case. We then use a generalization of a classical algorithm to obtain an $M$-approximation where $M$ is the maximum number of leaves of the subtrees representing the multicast communications. Surprisingly, the same algorithm, though in various disguises, is used in the literature at least four times to solve related problems (though the analysis is different). The special case of the problem where instances are restricted to unicast communications in a star topology network is known to be polynomial-time solvable. We extend this result and show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time for a set of paths in a tree that share a common vertex.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Set Cover with Delay -- Clairvoyance is not Required

In most online problems with delay, clairvoyance (i.e. knowing the future delay of a request upon its arrival) is required for polylogarithmic competitiveness. In this paper, we show that this is not the case for set cover with delay (SCD) -- specifically, we present the first non-clairvoyant algorithm, which is $O(\log n \log m)$-competitive, where $n$ is the number of elements and $m$ is the number of sets. This matches the best known result for the classic online set cover (a special case of non-clairvoyant SCD). Moreover, clairvoyance does not allow for significant improvement - we present lower bounds of $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$ and $Ω(\sqrt{\log m})$ for SCD which apply for the clairvoyant case. In addition, the competitiveness of our algorithm does not depend on the number of requests. Such a guarantee on the size of the universe alone was not previously known even for the clairvoyant case - the only previously-known algorithm (due to Carrasco et al.) is clairvoyant, with competitiveness that grows with the number of requests. For the special case of vertex cover with delay, we show a simpler, deterministic algorithm which is $3$-competitive (and also non-clairvoyant).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Singularly Optimal Randomized Leader Election

This paper concerns designing distributed algorithms that are singularly optimal, i.e., algorithms that are simultaneously time and message optimal, for the fundamental leader election problem in networks. Our main result is a randomized distributed leader election algorithm for asynchronous complete networks that is essentially (up to a polylogarithmic factor) singularly optimal. Our algorithm uses $O(n)$ messages with high probability and runs in $O(\log^2 n)$ time (with high probability) to elect a unique leader. The $O(n)$ message complexity should be contrasted with the $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bounds for the deterministic message complexity of leader election algorithms (regardless of time), proven by Korach, Moran, and Zaks (TCS, 1989) for asynchronous algorithms and by Afek and Gafni (SIAM J. Comput., 1991) for synchronous networks. Hence, our result also separates the message complexities of randomized and deterministic leader election. More importantly, our (randomized) time complexity of $O(\log^2 n)$ for obtaining the optimal $O(n)$ message complexity is significantly smaller than the long-standing $\tildeΘ(n)$ time complexity obtained by Afek and Gafni and by Singh (SIAM J. Comput., 1997) for message optimal (deterministic) election in asynchronous networks. In synchronous complete networks, Afek and Gafni showed an essentially singularly optimal deterministic algorithm with $O(\log n)$ time and $O(n \log n)$ messages. Ramanathan et al. (Distrib. Comput. 2007) used randomization to improve the message complexity, and showed a randomized algorithm with $O(n)$ messages and $O(\log n)$ time (with failure probability $O(1 / \log^{Ω(1)}n)$). Our second result is a tightly singularly optimal randomized algorithm, with $O(1)$ time and $O(n)$ messages, for this setting, whose time bound holds with certainty and message bound holds with high probability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access