BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Gopal Pandurangan

Gopal Pandurangan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Byzantine-Resilient Counting in Networks

We present two distributed algorithms for the {\em Byzantine counting problem}, which is concerned with estimating the size of a network in the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. In an $n$-node network ($n$ is unknown), our first algorithm, which is {\em deterministic}, finishes in $O(\log{n})$ rounds and is time-optimal. This algorithm can tolerate up to $O(n^{1 - γ})$ arbitrarily (adversarially) placed Byzantine nodes for any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant $γ$. It outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log{n}$ that would be known to all but $o(1)$ fraction of the good nodes. This algorithm works for \emph{any} bounded degree expander network. However, this algorithms assumes that good nodes can send arbitrarily large-sized messages in a round. Our second algorithm is {\em randomized} and most good nodes send only small-sized messages (Throughout this paper, a small-sized message is defined to be one that contains $O(\log{n})$ bits in addition to at most a constant number of node IDs.). This algorithm works in \emph{almost all} $d$-regular graphs. It tolerates up to $B(n) = n^{\frac{1}{2} - ξ}$ (note that $n$ and $B(n)$ are unknown to the algorithm) arbitrarily (adversarially) placed Byzantine nodes, where $ξ$ is any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant. This algorithm takes $O(B(n)\log^2{n})$ rounds and outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log{n}$ with probability at least $1 - o(1)$. The said estimate is known to most nodes, i.e., $\geq (1 - β)n$ nodes for any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant $β$. To complement our algorithms, we also present an impossibility result that shows that it is impossible to estimate the network size with any reasonable approximation with any non-trivial probability of success if the network does not have sufficient vertex expansion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Network Size Estimation in Small-World Networks under Byzantine Faults

We study the fundamental problem of counting the number of nodes in a sparse network (of unknown size) under the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. We assume the full information model where the Byzantine nodes have complete knowledge about the entire state of the network at every round (including random choices made by all the nodes), have unbounded computational power, and can deviate arbitrarily from the protocol. Our main contribution is a randomized distributed algorithm that estimates the size of a network under the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. In particular, our algorithm estimates the size of a sparse, "small-world", expander network with up to $O(n^{1 - δ})$ Byzantine nodes, where $n$ is the (unknown) network size and $δ$ can be be any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant. Our algorithm outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log(n)$ with high probability; the correct estimate of the network size will be known to a large fraction ($(1 - ε)$-fraction, for any fixed positive constant $ε$) of the honest nodes. Our algorithm is fully distributed, lightweight, and simple to implement, runs in $O(\log^3{n})$ rounds, and requires nodes to send and receive messages of only small-sized messages per round; any node's local computation cost per round is also small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Distributed Algorithms for the $K$-Nearest Neighbors Problem

The $K$-nearest neighbors is a basic problem in machine learning with numerous applications. In this problem, given a (training) set of $n$ data points with labels and a query point $p$, we want to assign a label to $p$ based on the labels of the $K$-nearest points to the query. We study this problem in the {\em $k$-machine model}, (Note that parameter $k$ stands for the number of machines in the $k$-machine model and is independent of $K$-nearest points.) a model for distributed large-scale data. In this model, we assume that the $n$ points are distributed (in a balanced fashion) among the $k$ machines and the goal is to quickly compute answer given a query point to a machine. Our main result is a simple randomized algorithm in the $k$-machine model that runs in $O(\log K)$ communication rounds with high probability success (regardless of the number of machines $k$ and the number of points $n$). The message complexity of the algorithm is small taking only $O(k\log K)$ messages. Our bounds are essentially the best possible for comparison-based algorithms (Algorithms that use only comparison operations ($\leq, \geq, =$) between elements to distinguish the ordering among them). This is due to the existence of a lower bound of $Ω(\log n)$ communication rounds for finding the {\em median} of $2n$ elements distributed evenly among two processors by Rodeh \cite{rodeh}. We also implemented our algorithm and show that it performs well compared to an algorithm (used in practice) that sends $K$ nearest points from each machine to a single machine which then computes the answer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Singularly Optimal Randomized Leader Election

This paper concerns designing distributed algorithms that are singularly optimal, i.e., algorithms that are simultaneously time and message optimal, for the fundamental leader election problem in networks. Our main result is a randomized distributed leader election algorithm for asynchronous complete networks that is essentially (up to a polylogarithmic factor) singularly optimal. Our algorithm uses $O(n)$ messages with high probability and runs in $O(\log^2 n)$ time (with high probability) to elect a unique leader. The $O(n)$ message complexity should be contrasted with the $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bounds for the deterministic message complexity of leader election algorithms (regardless of time), proven by Korach, Moran, and Zaks (TCS, 1989) for asynchronous algorithms and by Afek and Gafni (SIAM J. Comput., 1991) for synchronous networks. Hence, our result also separates the message complexities of randomized and deterministic leader election. More importantly, our (randomized) time complexity of $O(\log^2 n)$ for obtaining the optimal $O(n)$ message complexity is significantly smaller than the long-standing $\tildeΘ(n)$ time complexity obtained by Afek and Gafni and by Singh (SIAM J. Comput., 1997) for message optimal (deterministic) election in asynchronous networks. In synchronous complete networks, Afek and Gafni showed an essentially singularly optimal deterministic algorithm with $O(\log n)$ time and $O(n \log n)$ messages. Ramanathan et al. (Distrib. Comput. 2007) used randomization to improve the message complexity, and showed a randomized algorithm with $O(n)$ messages and $O(\log n)$ time (with failure probability $O(1 / \log^{Ω(1)}n)$). Our second result is a tightly singularly optimal randomized algorithm, with $O(1)$ time and $O(n)$ messages, for this setting, whose time bound holds with certainty and message bound holds with high probability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sleeping is Efficient: MIS in $O(1)$-rounds Node-averaged Awake Complexity

Maximal Independent Set (MIS) is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing. The round (time) complexity of distributed MIS has traditionally focused on the \emph{worst-case time} for all nodes to finish. The best-known (randomized) MIS algorithms take $O(\log{n})$ worst-case rounds on general graphs (where $n$ is the number of nodes). Motivated by the goal to reduce \emph{total} energy consumption in energy-constrained networks such as sensor and ad hoc wireless networks, we take an alternative approach to measuring performance. We focus on minimizing the total (or equivalently, the \emph{average}) time for all nodes to finish. It is not clear whether the currently best-known algorithms yield constant-round (or even $o(\log{n})$) node-averaged round complexity for MIS in general graphs. We posit the \emph{sleeping model}, a generalization of the traditional model, that allows nodes to enter either ``sleep'' or ``waking'' states at any round. While waking state corresponds to the default state in the traditional model, in sleeping state a node is ``offline'', i.e., it does not send or receive messages (and messages sent to it are dropped as well) and does not incur any time, communication, or local computation cost. Hence, in this model, only rounds in which a node is awake are counted and we are interested in minimizing the average as well as the worst-case number of rounds a node spends in the awake state. Our main result is that we show that {\em MIS can be solved in (expected) $O(1)$ rounds under node-averaged awake complexity measure} in the sleeping model. In particular, we present a randomized distributed algorithm for MIS that has expected {\em $O(1)$-rounds node-averaged awake complexity} and, with high probability has {\em $O(\log{n})$-rounds worst-case awake complexity} and {\em $O(\log^{3.41}n)$-rounds worst-case complexity}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access