Source author record

Sarita V. Adve

Sarita V. Adve appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Exploring Extended Reality with ILLIXR: A New Playground for Architecture Research

As we enter the era of domain-specific architectures, systems researchers must understand the requirements of emerging application domains. Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) or extended reality (XR) is one such important domain. This paper presents ILLIXR, the first open source end-to-end XR system (1) with state-of-the-art components, (2) integrated with a modular and extensible multithreaded runtime, (3) providing an OpenXR compliant interface to XR applications (e.g., game engines), and (4) with the ability to report (and trade off) several quality of experience (QoE) metrics. We analyze performance, power, and QoE metrics for the complete ILLIXR system and for its individual components. Our analysis reveals several properties with implications for architecture and systems research. These include demanding performance, power, and QoE requirements, a large diversity of critical tasks, inter-dependent execution pipelines with challenges in scheduling and resource management, and a large tradeoff space between performance/power and human perception related QoE metrics. ILLIXR and our analysis have the potential to propel new directions in architecture and systems research in general, and impact XR in particular. ILLIXR is open-source and available at https://illixr.github.io

preprint2020arXiv

HarDNN: Feature Map Vulnerability Evaluation in CNNs

As Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are increasingly being employed in safety-critical applications, it is important that they behave reliably in the face of hardware errors. Transient hardware errors may percolate undesirable state during execution, resulting in software-manifested errors which can adversely affect high-level decision making. This paper presents HarDNN, a software-directed approach to identify vulnerable computations during a CNN inference and selectively protect them based on their propensity towards corrupting the inference output in the presence of a hardware error. We show that HarDNN can accurately estimate relative vulnerability of a feature map (fmap) in CNNs using a statistical error injection campaign, and explore heuristics for fast vulnerability assessment. Based on these results, we analyze the tradeoff between error coverage and computational overhead that the system designers can use to employ selective protection. Results show that the improvement in resilience for the added computation is superlinear with HarDNN. For example, HarDNN improves SqueezeNet's resilience by 10x with just 30% additional computations.

preprint2020arXiv

Specializing Coherence, Consistency, and Push/Pull for GPU Graph Analytics

This work provides the first study to explore the interaction of update propagation with and without fine-grained synchronization (push vs. pull), emerging coherence protocols (GPU vs. DeNovo coherence), and software-centric consistency models (DRF0, DRF1, and DRFrlx) for graph workloads on emerging integrated GPU-CPU systems with native unified shared memory. We study 6 graph applications with 6 graph inputs for a total of 36 workloads running on 12 system (hardware+software) configurations reflecting the above design space of update propagation, coherence, and memory consistency. We make three key contributions. First, we show that there is no single best system configuration for all workloads, motivating systems with flexible coherence and consistency support. Second, we develop a model to accurately predict the best system configuration -- this model can be used by software designers to decide on push vs. pull and the consistency model and by flexible hardware to invoke the appropriate coherence and consistency configuration for the given workload. Third, we show that the design dimensions explored here are inter-dependent, reinforcing the need for software-hardware co-design in the above design dimensions. For example, software designers deciding on push vs. pull must consider the consistency model supported by hardware -- in some cases, push maybe better if hardware supports DRFrlx while pull may be better if hardware does not support DRFrlx.