BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Saeed Seddighin

Saeed Seddighin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Dynamic Subset Sum with Truly Sublinear Processing Time

Subset sum is a very old and fundamental problem in theoretical computer science. In this problem, $n$ items with weights $w_1, w_2, w_3, \ldots, w_n$ are given as input and the goal is to find out if there is a subset of them whose weights sum up to a given value $t$. While the problem is NP-hard in general, when the values are non-negative integer, subset sum can be solved in pseudo-polynomial time $~\widetilde O(n+t)$. In this work, we consider the dynamic variant of subset sum. In this setting, an upper bound $\tmax$ is provided in advance to the algorithm and in each operation, either a new item is added to the problem or for a given integer value $t \leq \tmax$, the algorithm is required to output whether there is a subset of items whose sum of weights is equal to $t$. Unfortunately, none of the existing subset sum algorithms is able to process these operations in truly sublinear time\footnote{Truly sublinear means $n^{1-Ω(1)}$.} in terms of $\tmax$. Our main contribution is an algorithm whose amortized processing time\footnote{Since the runtimes are amortized, we do not use separate terms update time and query time for different operations and use processing time for all types of operations.} for each operation is truly sublinear in $\tmax$ when the number of operations is at least $\tmax^{2/3+Ω(1)}$. We also show that when both element addition and element removal are allowed, there is no algorithm that can process each operation in time $\tmax^{1-Ω(1)}$ on average unless \textsf{SETH}\footnote{The \textit{strong exponential time hypothesis} states that no algorithm can solve the satisfiability problem in time $2^{n(1-Ω(1))}$.} fails.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Dynamic Longest Increasing Subsequence and the Erdös-Szekeres Partitioning Problem

In this paper, we provide new approximation algorithms for dynamic variations of the longest increasing subsequence (\textsf{LIS}) problem, and the complementary distance to monotonicity (\textsf{DTM}) problem. In this setting, operations of the following form arrive sequentially: (i) add an element, (ii) remove an element, or (iii) substitute an element for another. At every point in time, the algorithm has an approximation to the longest increasing subsequence (or distance to monotonicity). We present a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for \textsf{DTM} with polylogarithmic worst-case update time and a constant factor approximation algorithm for \textsf{LIS} with worst-case update time $\tilde O(n^ε)$ for any constant $ε> 0$.% $n$ in the runtime denotes the size of the array at the time the operation arrives. Our dynamic algorithm for \textsf{LIS} leads to an almost optimal algorithm for the Erdös-Szekeres partitioning problem. Erdös-Szekeres partitioning problem was introduced by Erdös and Szekeres in 1935 and was known to be solvable in time $O(n^{1.5}\log n)$. Subsequent work improve the runtime to $O(n^{1.5})$ only in 1998. Our dynamic \textsf{LIS} algorithm leads to a solution for Erdös-Szekeres partitioning problem with runtime $\tilde O_ε(n^{1+ε})$ for any constant $ε> 0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximating LCS in Linear Time: Beating the $\sqrt{n}$ Barrier

Longest common subsequence (LCS) is one of the most fundamental problems in combinatorial optimization. Apart from theoretical importance, LCS has enormous applications in bioinformatics, revision control systems, and data comparison programs. Although a simple dynamic program computes LCS in quadratic time, it has been recently proven that the problem admits a conditional lower bound and may not be solved in truly subquadratic time. In addition to this, LCS is notoriously hard with respect to approximation algorithms. Apart from a trivial sampling technique that obtains a $n^{x}$ approximation solution in time $O(n^{2-2x})$ nothing else is known for LCS. This is in sharp contrast to its dual problem edit distance for which several linear time solutions are obtained in the past two decades.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymmetric Streaming Algorithms for Edit Distance and LCS

The edit distance (ED) and longest common subsequence (LCS) are two fundamental problems which quantify how similar two strings are to one another. In this paper, we consider these problems in the asymmetric streaming model introduced by Andoni et al. (FOCS'10) and Saks and Seshadhri (SODA'13). In this model we have random access to one string and streaming access the other string. Our main contribution is a constant factor approximation algorithm for ED with the memory of $\tilde O(n^δ)$ for any constant $δ> 0$. In addition to this, we present an upper bound of $\tilde O_ε(\sqrt{n})$ on the memory needed to approximate ED or LCS within a factor $1+ε$. All our algorithms are deterministic and run in a single pass. For approximating ED within a constant factor, we discover yet another application of triangle inequality, this time in the context of streaming algorithms. Triangle inequality has been previously used to obtain subquadratic time approximation algorithms for ED. Our technique is novel and elegantly utilizes triangle inequality to save memory at the expense of an exponential increase in the runtime.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning Complexity of Simulated Annealing

Simulated annealing is an effective and general means of optimization. It is in fact inspired by metallurgy, where the temperature of a material determines its behavior in thermodynamics. Likewise, in simulated annealing, the actions that the algorithm takes depend entirely on the value of a variable which captures the notion of temperature. Typically, simulated annealing starts with a high temperature, which makes the algorithm pretty unpredictable, and gradually cools the temperature down to become more stable. A key component that plays a crucial role in the performance of simulated annealing is the criteria under which the temperature changes namely, the cooling schedule. Motivated by this, we study the following question in this work: "Given enough samples to the instances of a specific class of optimization problems, can we design optimal (or approximately optimal) cooling schedules that minimize the runtime or maximize the success rate of the algorithm on average when the underlying problem is drawn uniformly at random from the same class?" We provide positive results both in terms of sample complexity and simulation complexity. For sample complexity, we show that $\tilde O(\sqrt{m})$ samples suffice to find an approximately optimal cooling schedule of length $m$. We complement this result by giving a lower bound of $\tilde Ω(m^{1/3})$ on the sample complexity of any learning algorithm that provides an almost optimal cooling schedule. These results are general and rely on no assumption. For simulation complexity, however, we make additional assumptions to measure the success rate of an algorithm. To this end, we introduce the monotone stationary graph that models the performance of simulated annealing. Based on this model, we present polynomial time algorithms with provable guarantees for the learning problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access