BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Aviad Rubinstein

Aviad Rubinstein appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheorySocial and Information NetworksMachine LearningDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.PRphysics.soc-phPopulations and Evolution

Catalog footprint

What is connected

24works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

24 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear Time

We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching in graphs. Our main result is a $(\frac{1}{2}+Ω(1))$-approximation algorithm which can be implemented in $O(n^{1+ε})$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices and the constant $ε> 0$ can be made arbitrarily small. The best known lower bound for the problem is $Ω(n)$, which holds for any constant approximation. Existing algorithms either obtain the greedy bound of $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation [Behnezhad FOCS'21], or require some assumption on the maximum degree to run in $o(n^2)$-time [Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito STOC'09]. We improve over these by designing a less "adaptive" augmentation algorithm for maximum matching that might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Budget-Smoothed Analysis for Submodular Maximization

The greedy algorithm for monotone submodular function maximization subject to cardinality constraint is guaranteed to approximate the optimal solution to within a $1-1/e$ factor. Although it is well known that this guarantee is essentially tight in the worst case -- for greedy and in fact any efficient algorithm, experiments show that greedy performs better in practice. We observe that for many applications in practice, the empirical distribution of the budgets (i.e., cardinality constraints) is supported on a wide range, and moreover, all the existing hardness results in theory break under a large perturbation of the budget. To understand the effect of the budget from both algorithmic and hardness perspectives, we introduce a new notion of budget smoothed analysis. We prove that greedy is optimal for every budget distribution, and we give a characterization for the worst-case submodular functions. Based on these results, we show that on the algorithmic side, under realistic budget distributions, greedy and related algorithms enjoy provably better approximation guarantees, that hold even for worst-case functions, and on the hardness side, there exist hard functions that are fairly robust to all the budget distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Maximizing Non-Monotone Submodular Functions over Small Subsets: Beyond $1/2$-Approximation

In this work we give two new algorithms that use similar techniques for (non-monotone) submodular function maximization subject to a cardinality constraint. The first is an offline fixed parameter tractable algorithm that guarantees a $0.539$-approximation for all non-negative submodular functions. The second algorithm works in the random-order streaming model. It guarantees a $(1/2+c)$-approximation for symmetric functions, and we complement it by showing that no space-efficient algorithm can beat $1/2$ for asymmetric functions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first provable separation between symmetric and asymmetric submodular function maximization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Simple Sublinear Algorithm for Gap Edit Distance

We study the problem of estimating the edit distance between two $n$-character strings. While exact computation in the worst case is believed to require near-quadratic time, previous work showed that in certain regimes it is possible to solve the following {\em gap edit distance} problem in sub-linear time: distinguish between inputs of distance $\le k$ and $>k^2$. Our main result is a very simple algorithm for this benchmark that runs in time $\tilde O(n/\sqrt{k})$, and in particular settles the open problem of obtaining a truly sublinear time for the entire range of relevant $k$. Building on the same framework, we also obtain a $k$-vs-$k^2$ algorithm for the one-sided preprocessing model with $\tilde O(n)$ preprocessing time and $\tilde O(n/k)$ query time (improving over a recent $\tilde O(n/k+k^2)$-query time algorithm for the same problem [GRS'20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymmetric Streaming Algorithms for Edit Distance and LCS

The edit distance (ED) and longest common subsequence (LCS) are two fundamental problems which quantify how similar two strings are to one another. In this paper, we consider these problems in the asymmetric streaming model introduced by Andoni et al. (FOCS'10) and Saks and Seshadhri (SODA'13). In this model we have random access to one string and streaming access the other string. Our main contribution is a constant factor approximation algorithm for ED with the memory of $\tilde O(n^δ)$ for any constant $δ> 0$. In addition to this, we present an upper bound of $\tilde O_ε(\sqrt{n})$ on the memory needed to approximate ED or LCS within a factor $1+ε$. All our algorithms are deterministic and run in a single pass. For approximating ED within a constant factor, we discover yet another application of triangle inequality, this time in the context of streaming algorithms. Triangle inequality has been previously used to obtain subquadratic time approximation algorithms for ED. Our technique is novel and elegantly utilizes triangle inequality to save memory at the expense of an exponential increase in the runtime.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Smoothed Complexity of 2-player Nash Equilibria

We prove that computing a Nash equilibrium of a two-player ($n \times n$) game with payoffs in $[-1,1]$ is PPAD-hard (under randomized reductions) even in the smoothed analysis setting, smoothing with noise of constant magnitude. This gives a strong negative answer to conjectures of Spielman and Teng [ST06] and Cheng, Deng, and Teng [CDT09]. In contrast to prior work proving PPAD-hardness after smoothing by noise of magnitude $1/\operatorname{poly}(n)$ [CDT09], our smoothed complexity result is not proved via hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria. This is by necessity, since Nash equilibria can be approximated to constant error in quasi-polynomial time [LMM03]. Our results therefore separate smoothed complexity and hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria in two-player games. The key ingredient in our reduction is the use of a random zero-sum game as a gadget to produce two-player games which remain hard even after smoothing. Our analysis crucially shows that all Nash equilibria of random zero-sum games are far from pure (with high probability), and that this remains true even after smoothing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Combinatorial Prophet Inequalities

We introduce a novel framework of Prophet Inequalities for combinatorial valuation functions. For a (non-monotone) submodular objective function over an arbitrary matroid feasibility constraint, we give an $O(1)$-competitive algorithm. For a monotone subadditive objective function over an arbitrary downward-closed feasibility constraint, we give an $O(\log n \log^2 r)$-competitive algorithm (where $r$ is the cardinality of the largest feasible subset). Inspired by the proof of our subadditive prophet inequality, we also obtain an $O(\log n \cdot \log^2 r)$-competitive algorithm for the Secretary Problem with a monotone subadditive objective function subject to an arbitrary downward-closed feasibility constraint. Even for the special case of a cardinality feasibility constraint, our algorithm circumvents an $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ lower bound by Bateni, Hajiaghayi, and Zadimoghaddam \cite{BHZ13-submodular-secretary_original} in a restricted query model. En route to our submodular prophet inequality, we prove a technical result of independent interest: we show a variant of the Correlation Gap Lemma for non-monotone submodular functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Communication complexity of approximate Nash equilibria

For a constant $ε$, we prove a poly(N) lower bound on the (randomized) communication complexity of $ε$-Nash equilibrium in two-player NxN games. For n-player binary-action games we prove an exp(n) lower bound for the (randomized) communication complexity of $(ε,ε)$-weak approximate Nash equilibrium, which is a profile of mixed actions such that at least $(1-ε)$-fraction of the players are $ε$-best replying.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Detecting communities is hard, and counting them is even harder

We consider the algorithmic problem of community detection in networks. Given an undirected friendship graph $G=\left(V,E\right)$, a subset $S\subseteq V$ is an $\left(α,β\right)$-community if: * Every member of the community is friends with an $α$-fraction of the community; * Every non-member is friends with at most a $β$-fraction of the community. Arora et al [AGSS12] gave a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for enumerating all the $\left(α,β\right)$-communities for any constants $α>β$. Here, we prove that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), quasi-polynomial time is in fact necessary - and even for a much weaker approximation desideratum. Namely, distinguishing between: * $G$ contains an $\left(1,o\left(1\right)\right)$-community; and * $G$ does not contain an $\left(β+o\left(1\right),β\right)$-community for any $β\in\left[0,1\right]$. We also prove that counting the number of $\left(1,o\left(1\right)\right)$-communities requires quasi-polynomial time assuming the weaker #ETH.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Inapproximability of Nash Equilibrium

We prove that finding an $ε$-approximate Nash equilibrium is PPAD-complete for constant $ε$ and a particularly simple class of games: polymatrix, degree 3 graphical games, in which each player has only two actions. As corollaries, we also prove similar inapproximability results for Bayesian Nash equilibrium in a two-player incomplete information game with a constant number of actions, for relative $ε$-Well Supported Nash Equilibrium in a two-player game, for market equilibrium in a non-monotone market, for the generalized circuit problem defined by Chen, Deng, and Teng [CDT'09], and for approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes with indivisible goods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Settling the complexity of computing approximate two-player Nash equilibria

We prove that there exists a constant $ε>0$ such that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis for PPAD, computing an $ε$-approximate Nash equilibrium in a two-player (nXn) game requires quasi-polynomial time, $n^{\log^{1-o(1)} n}$. This matches (up to the o(1) term) the algorithm of Lipton, Markakis, and Mehta [LMM03]. Our proof relies on a variety of techniques from the study of probabilistically checkable proofs (PCP); this is the first time that such ideas are used for a reduction between problems inside PPAD. En route, we also prove new hardness results for computing Nash equilibria in games with many players. In particular, we show that computing an $ε$-approximate Nash equilibrium in a game with n players requires $2^{Ω(n)}$ oracle queries to the payoff tensors. This resolves an open problem posed by Hart and Nisan [HN13], Babichenko [Bab14], and Chen et al. [CCT15]. In fact, our results for n-player games are stronger: they hold with respect to the $(ε,δ)$-WeakNash relaxation recently introduced by Babichenko et al. [BPR16].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The Limitations of Optimization from Samples

In this paper we consider the following question: can we optimize objective functions from the training data we use to learn them? We formalize this question through a novel framework we call optimization from samples (OPS). In OPS, we are given sampled values of a function drawn from some distribution and the objective is to optimize the function under some constraint. While there are interesting classes of functions that can be optimized from samples, our main result is an impossibility. We show that there are classes of functions which are statistically learnable and optimizable, but for which no reasonable approximation for optimization from samples is achievable. In particular, our main result shows that there is no constant factor approximation for maximizing coverage functions under a cardinality constraint using polynomially-many samples drawn from any distribution. We also show tight approximation guarantees for maximization under a cardinality constraint of several interesting classes of functions including unit-demand, additive, and general monotone submodular functions, as well as a constant factor approximation for monotone submodular functions with bounded curvature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Boolean functions whose Fourier transform is concentrated on pairwise disjoint subsets of the input

We consider Boolean functions f:{-1,1}^n->{-1,1} that are close to a sum of independent functions on mutually exclusive subsets of the variables. We prove that any such function is close to just a single function on a single subset. We also consider Boolean functions f:R^n->{-1,1} that are close, with respect to any product distribution over R^n, to a sum of their variables. We prove that any such function is close to one of the variables. Both our results are independent of the number of variables, but depend on the variance of f. I.e., if f is ε*Var(f)-close to a sum of independent functions or random variables, then it is O(ε)-close to one of the independent functions or random variables, respectively. We prove that this dependence on Var(f) is tight. Our results are a generalization of the Friedgut-Kalai-Naor Theorem [FKN'02], which holds for functions f:{-1,1}^n->{-1,1} that are close to a linear combination of uniformly distributed Boolean variables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Combining Traditional Marketing and Viral Marketing with Amphibious Influence Maximization

In this paper, we propose the amphibious influence maximization (AIM) model that combines traditional marketing via content providers and viral marketing to consumers in social networks in a single framework. In AIM, a set of content providers and consumers form a bipartite network while consumers also form their social network, and influence propagates from the content providers to consumers and among consumers in the social network following the independent cascade model. An advertiser needs to select a subset of seed content providers and a subset of seed consumers, such that the influence from the seed providers passing through the seed consumers could reach a large number of consumers in the social network in expectation. We prove that the AIM problem is NP-hard to approximate to within any constant factor via a reduction from Feige's k-prover proof system for 3-SAT5. We also give evidence that even when the social network graph is trivial (i.e. has no edges), a polynomial time constant factor approximation for AIM is unlikely. However, when we assume that the weighted bi-adjacency matrix that describes the influence of content providers on consumers is of constant rank, a common assumption often used in recommender systems, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves approximation ratio of $(1-1/e-ε)^3$ for any (polynomially small) $ε> 0$. Our algorithmic results still hold for a more general model where cascades in social network follow a general monotone and submodular function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

ETH Hardness for Densest-$k$-Subgraph with Perfect Completeness

We show that, assuming the (deterministic) Exponential Time Hypothesis, distinguishing between a graph with an induced $k$-clique and a graph in which all k-subgraphs have density at most $1-ε$, requires $n^{\tilde Ω(log n)}$ time. Our result essentially matches the quasi-polynomial algorithms of Feige and Seltser [FS97] and Barman [Bar15] for this problem, and is the first one to rule out an additive PTAS for Densest $k$-Subgraph. We further strengthen this result by showing that our lower bound continues to hold when, in the soundness case, even subgraphs smaller by a near-polynomial factor ($k' = k 2^{-\tilde Ω(log n)}$) are assumed to be at most ($1-ε$)-dense. Our reduction is inspired by recent applications of the "birthday repetition" technique [AIM14,BKW15]. Our analysis relies on information theoretical machinery and is similar in spirit to analyzing a parallel repetition of two-prover games in which the provers may choose to answer some challenges multiple times, while completely ignoring other challenges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Locally Adaptive Optimization: Adaptive Seeding for Monotone Submodular Functions

The Adaptive Seeding problem is an algorithmic challenge motivated by influence maximization in social networks: One seeks to select among certain accessible nodes in a network, and then select, adaptively, among neighbors of those nodes as they become accessible in order to maximize a global objective function. More generally, adaptive seeding is a stochastic optimization framework where the choices in the first stage affect the realizations in the second stage, over which we aim to optimize. Our main result is a $(1-1/e)^2$-approximation for the adaptive seeding problem for any monotone submodular function. While adaptive policies are often approximated via non-adaptive policies, our algorithm is based on a novel method we call \emph{locally-adaptive} policies. These policies combine a non-adaptive global structure, with local adaptive optimizations. This method enables the $(1-1/e)^2$-approximation for general monotone submodular functions and circumvents some of the impossibilities associated with non-adaptive policies. We also introduce a fundamental problem in submodular optimization that may be of independent interest: given a ground set of elements where every element appears with some small probability, find a set of expected size at most $k$ that has the highest expected value over the realization of the elements. We show a surprising result: there are classes of monotone submodular functions (including coverage) that can be approximated almost optimally as the probability vanishes. For general monotone submodular functions we show via a reduction from \textsc{Planted-Clique} that approximations for this problem are not likely to be obtainable. This optimization problem is an important tool for adaptive seeding via non-adaptive policies, and its hardness motivates the introduction of \emph{locally-adaptive} policies we use in the main result.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the Computational Complexity of Optimal Simple Mechanisms

We consider a monopolist seller facing a single buyer with additive valuations over n heterogeneous, independent items. It is known that in this important setting optimal mechanisms may require randomization [HR12], use menus of infinite size [DDT15], and may be computationally intractable [DDT14]. This has sparked recent interest in finding simple mechanisms that obtain reasonable approximations to the optimal revenue [HN12, LY13, BILW14]. In this work we attempt to find the optimal simple mechanism. There are many ways to define simple mechanisms. Here we restrict our search to partition mechanisms, where the seller partitions the items into disjoint bundles and posts a price for each bundle; the buyer is allowed to buy any number of bundles. We give a PTAS for the problem of finding a revenue-maximizing partition mechanism, and prove that the problem is strongly NP-hard. En route, we prove structural properties of near-optimal partition mechanisms which may be of independent interest: for example, there always exists a near-optimal partition mechanism that uses only a constant number of non-trivial bundles (i.e. bundles with more than one item).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the Worst-Case Approximability of Sparse PCA

It is well known that Sparse PCA (Sparse Principal Component Analysis) is NP-hard to solve exactly on worst-case instances. What is the complexity of solving Sparse PCA approximately? Our contributions include: 1) a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves an $n^{-1/3}$-approximation; 2) NP-hardness of approximation to within $(1-\varepsilon)$, for some small constant $\varepsilon > 0$; 3) SSE-hardness of approximation to within any constant factor; and 4) an $\exp\exp\left(Ω\left(\sqrt{\log \log n}\right)\right)$ ("quasi-quasi-polynomial") gap for the standard semidefinite program.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Simplex Pivoting Rules and Complexity Theory

We show that there are simplex pivoting rules for which it is PSPACE-complete to tell if a particular basis will appear on the algorithm's path. Such rules cannot be the basis of a strongly polynomial algorithm, unless P = PSPACE. We conjecture that the same can be shown for most known variants of the simplex method. However, we also point out that Dantzig's shadow vertex algorithm has a polynomial path problem. Finally, we discuss in the same context randomized pivoting rules.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Satisfiability and Evolution

We show that, if truth assignments on $n$ variables reproduce through recombination so that satisfaction of a particular Boolean function confers a small evolutionary advantage, then a polynomially large population over polynomially many generations (polynomial in $n$ and the inverse of the initial satisfaction probability) will end up almost certainly consisting exclusively of satisfying truth assignments. We argue that this theorem sheds light on the problem of novelty in Evolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Complexity of Fairness through Equilibrium

Competitive equilibrium with equal incomes (CEEI) is a well known fair allocation mechanism; however, for indivisible resources a CEEI may not exist. It was shown in [Budish '11] that in the case of indivisible resources there is always an allocation, called A-CEEI, that is approximately fair, approximately truthful, and approximately efficient, for some favorable approximation parameters. This approximation is used in practice to assign students to classes. In this paper we show that finding the A-CEEI allocation guaranteed to exist by Budish's theorem is PPAD-complete. We further show that finding an approximate equilibrium with better approximation guarantees is even harder: NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Converting online algorithms to local computation algorithms

We propose a general method for converting online algorithms to local computation algorithms by selecting a random permutation of the input, and simulating running the online algorithm. We bound the number of steps of the algorithm using a query tree, which models the dependencies between queries. We improve previous analyses of query trees on graphs of bounded degree, and extend the analysis to the cases where the degrees are distributed binomially, and to a special case of bipartite graphs. Using this method, we give a local computation algorithm for maximal matching in graphs of bounded degree, which runs in time and space O(log^3 n). We also show how to convert a large family of load balancing algorithms (related to balls and bins problems) to local computation algorithms. This gives several local load balancing algorithms which achieve the same approximation ratios as the online algorithms, but run in O(log n) time and space. Finally, we modify existing local computation algorithms for hypergraph 2-coloring and k-CNF and use our improved analysis to obtain better time and space bounds, of O(log^4 n), removing the dependency on the maximal degree of the graph from the exponent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access