BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Aviad Rubinstein

Aviad Rubinstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear Time

We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching in graphs. Our main result is a $(\frac{1}{2}+Ω(1))$-approximation algorithm which can be implemented in $O(n^{1+ε})$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices and the constant $ε> 0$ can be made arbitrarily small. The best known lower bound for the problem is $Ω(n)$, which holds for any constant approximation. Existing algorithms either obtain the greedy bound of $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation [Behnezhad FOCS'21], or require some assumption on the maximum degree to run in $o(n^2)$-time [Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito STOC'09]. We improve over these by designing a less "adaptive" augmentation algorithm for maximum matching that might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Budget-Smoothed Analysis for Submodular Maximization

The greedy algorithm for monotone submodular function maximization subject to cardinality constraint is guaranteed to approximate the optimal solution to within a $1-1/e$ factor. Although it is well known that this guarantee is essentially tight in the worst case -- for greedy and in fact any efficient algorithm, experiments show that greedy performs better in practice. We observe that for many applications in practice, the empirical distribution of the budgets (i.e., cardinality constraints) is supported on a wide range, and moreover, all the existing hardness results in theory break under a large perturbation of the budget. To understand the effect of the budget from both algorithmic and hardness perspectives, we introduce a new notion of budget smoothed analysis. We prove that greedy is optimal for every budget distribution, and we give a characterization for the worst-case submodular functions. Based on these results, we show that on the algorithmic side, under realistic budget distributions, greedy and related algorithms enjoy provably better approximation guarantees, that hold even for worst-case functions, and on the hardness side, there exist hard functions that are fairly robust to all the budget distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Maximizing Non-Monotone Submodular Functions over Small Subsets: Beyond $1/2$-Approximation

In this work we give two new algorithms that use similar techniques for (non-monotone) submodular function maximization subject to a cardinality constraint. The first is an offline fixed parameter tractable algorithm that guarantees a $0.539$-approximation for all non-negative submodular functions. The second algorithm works in the random-order streaming model. It guarantees a $(1/2+c)$-approximation for symmetric functions, and we complement it by showing that no space-efficient algorithm can beat $1/2$ for asymmetric functions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first provable separation between symmetric and asymmetric submodular function maximization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Simple Sublinear Algorithm for Gap Edit Distance

We study the problem of estimating the edit distance between two $n$-character strings. While exact computation in the worst case is believed to require near-quadratic time, previous work showed that in certain regimes it is possible to solve the following {\em gap edit distance} problem in sub-linear time: distinguish between inputs of distance $\le k$ and $>k^2$. Our main result is a very simple algorithm for this benchmark that runs in time $\tilde O(n/\sqrt{k})$, and in particular settles the open problem of obtaining a truly sublinear time for the entire range of relevant $k$. Building on the same framework, we also obtain a $k$-vs-$k^2$ algorithm for the one-sided preprocessing model with $\tilde O(n)$ preprocessing time and $\tilde O(n/k)$ query time (improving over a recent $\tilde O(n/k+k^2)$-query time algorithm for the same problem [GRS'20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymmetric Streaming Algorithms for Edit Distance and LCS

The edit distance (ED) and longest common subsequence (LCS) are two fundamental problems which quantify how similar two strings are to one another. In this paper, we consider these problems in the asymmetric streaming model introduced by Andoni et al. (FOCS'10) and Saks and Seshadhri (SODA'13). In this model we have random access to one string and streaming access the other string. Our main contribution is a constant factor approximation algorithm for ED with the memory of $\tilde O(n^δ)$ for any constant $δ> 0$. In addition to this, we present an upper bound of $\tilde O_ε(\sqrt{n})$ on the memory needed to approximate ED or LCS within a factor $1+ε$. All our algorithms are deterministic and run in a single pass. For approximating ED within a constant factor, we discover yet another application of triangle inequality, this time in the context of streaming algorithms. Triangle inequality has been previously used to obtain subquadratic time approximation algorithms for ED. Our technique is novel and elegantly utilizes triangle inequality to save memory at the expense of an exponential increase in the runtime.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Smoothed Complexity of 2-player Nash Equilibria

We prove that computing a Nash equilibrium of a two-player ($n \times n$) game with payoffs in $[-1,1]$ is PPAD-hard (under randomized reductions) even in the smoothed analysis setting, smoothing with noise of constant magnitude. This gives a strong negative answer to conjectures of Spielman and Teng [ST06] and Cheng, Deng, and Teng [CDT09]. In contrast to prior work proving PPAD-hardness after smoothing by noise of magnitude $1/\operatorname{poly}(n)$ [CDT09], our smoothed complexity result is not proved via hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria. This is by necessity, since Nash equilibria can be approximated to constant error in quasi-polynomial time [LMM03]. Our results therefore separate smoothed complexity and hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria in two-player games. The key ingredient in our reduction is the use of a random zero-sum game as a gadget to produce two-player games which remain hard even after smoothing. Our analysis crucially shows that all Nash equilibria of random zero-sum games are far from pure (with high probability), and that this remains true even after smoothing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access