Source author record

Rémi Dendievel

Rémi Dendievel appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Social network analytics for supervised fraud detection in insurance

Insurance fraud occurs when policyholders file claims that are exaggerated or based on intentional damages. This contribution develops a fraud detection strategy by extracting insightful information from the social network of a claim. First, we construct a network by linking claims with all their involved parties, including the policyholders, brokers, experts, and garages. Next, we establish fraud as a social phenomenon in the network and use the BiRank algorithm with a fraud specific query vector to compute a fraud score for each claim. From the network, we extract features related to the fraud scores as well as the claims' neighborhood structure. Finally, we combine these network features with the claim-specific features and build a supervised model with fraud in motor insurance as the target variable. Although we build a model for only motor insurance, the network includes claims from all available lines of business. Our results show that models with features derived from the network perform well when detecting fraud and even outperform the models using only the classical claim-specific features. Combining network and claim-specific features further improves the performance of supervised learning models to detect fraud. The resulting model flags highly suspicions claims that need to be further investigated. Our approach provides a guided and intelligent selection of claims and contributes to a more effective fraud investigation process.

preprint2016arXiv

One step futher: an explicit solution to Robbins' problem when $n=4$

Fix some $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and let $X_1, X_2,\dots, X_n$ be independent random variables drawn from the uniform distribution on $[0,1]$. A decision maker is shown the variables sequentially and, after each observation, must decide whether or not to keep the current one, with payoff the overall rank of the selected observation. Decisions are final: no recall is allowed, no regret is tolerated. The objective is to act in such a way as to minimise the expected payoff. In this note we give the explicit solution to this problem, known as Robbins' problem of optimal stopping, when $n=4$.

preprint2016arXiv

The Unified Approach for the Best Choice Problem Applied to Alternative-Choice Selection Problems

The objective of this paper is to show that the so-called unified approach to stopping problems with unknown cardinality introduced in Bruss (1984) proves to be efficient for solving other types of best-choice problems. We show that what we will call the alternative-choice stopping problem, which will be exemplified right away in Section 1, can be seen as a "two-sided" Secretary problem. This problem is instigated by a former problem of R. R. Weber (Cambridge University). Our approach yields for unknown cardinality the sharp lower bound $1/2$ for the probability of success. This problem is, at the same time, a special case of a model more generally based on $k \ge 2$ linearly ordered subsets. We shall also give the solution for such problems for k independent streams of arrivals. Our approach is elementary and self-contained.

preprint2013arXiv

Weber's optimal stopping problem and generalizations

One way to interpret the classical secretary problem (CSP) is to consider it as a special case of the following problem. We observe $n$ independent indicator variables $I_1,I_2,\dotsc,I_n$ sequentially and we try to stop on the last variable being equal to 1. If $I_k=1$ it means that the $k$-th observed secretary has smaller rank than all previous ones (and therefore is a better secretary). In the CSP $p_k=E(I_k)=1/k$ and the last $k$ with $I_k=1$ stands for the best candidate. The more general problem of stopping on a last "1" was studied by Bruss(2000). In what we will call Weber's problem the variables $I_k$ can take more than two values and we try to stop on the last occurence of \textit{one} of these values. Notice that we do not know in advance the value taken by the variable on which we stop. We can solve this problem in some cases and provide algorithms to compute the optimal stopping rule. These cases carry enough generality to be applicable in concrete situations.

preprint2012arXiv

New developments of the odds theorem

The odds theorem and the corresponding solution algorithm (odds algorithm) are tools to solve a wide range of optimal stopping problems. Its generality and tractability have caught much attention. (Google for instance "Bruss odds" to obtain a quick overview.) Many extensions and modifications of the this result have appeared since publication in~2000. This article reviews the important gnew developments and applications in this field. The spectrum of application comprises as different fields as secretary problems, more general stopping problems, robotic maintenance problems, compassionate use clinical trials and others. This review also includes a new contribution of our own.