Paper detail

Weber's optimal stopping problem and generalizations

One way to interpret the classical secretary problem (CSP) is to consider it as a special case of the following problem. We observe $n$ independent indicator variables $I_1,I_2,\dotsc,I_n$ sequentially and we try to stop on the last variable being equal to 1. If $I_k=1$ it means that the $k$-th observed secretary has smaller rank than all previous ones (and therefore is a better secretary). In the CSP $p_k=E(I_k)=1/k$ and the last $k$ with $I_k=1$ stands for the best candidate. The more general problem of stopping on a last "1" was studied by Bruss(2000). In what we will call Weber's problem the variables $I_k$ can take more than two values and we try to stop on the last occurence of \textit{one} of these values. Notice that we do not know in advance the value taken by the variable on which we stop. We can solve this problem in some cases and provide algorithms to compute the optimal stopping rule. These cases carry enough generality to be applicable in concrete situations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.