BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Radoslav Harman

Radoslav Harman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ComputationMethodologymath.OCmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Removal of Redundant Candidate Points for the Exact D-Optimal Design Problem

One of the most common problems in statistical experimentation is computing D-optimal designs on large finite candidate sets. While optimal approximate (i.e., infinite-sample) designs can be efficiently computed using convex methods, constructing optimal exact (i.e., finite-sample) designs is a substantially more difficult integer-optimization problem. In this paper, we propose necessary conditions, based on approximate designs, that must be satisfied by any support point of a D-optimal exact design. These conditions enable rapid elimination of redundant candidate points without loss of optimality, thereby reducing memory requirements and runtime of subsequent exact design algorithms. In addition, we prove that for sufficiently large sample sizes, the supports of D-optimal exact designs are contained in a typically small maximum-variance set. We demonstrate the approach on randomly generated benchmark models with candidate sets up to 100 million points, and on commonly used constrained mixture models with up to one million points. The proposed approach reduces the initial candidate sets by several orders of magnitude, thereby making it possible to compute exact D-optimal designs for these problems via mixed-integer second-order cone programming, which provides optimality guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

A design criterion for symmetric model discrimination based on nominal confidence sets

Experimental design applications for discriminating between models have been hampered by the assumption to know beforehand which model is the true one, which is counter to the very aim of the experiment. Previous approaches to alleviate this requirement were either symmetrizations of asymmetric techniques, or Bayesian, minimax and sequential approaches. Here we present a genuinely symmetric criterion based on a linearized distance between mean-value surfaces and the newly introduced tool of flexible nominal confidence sets. We demonstrate the computational efficiency of the approach using the proposed criterion and provide a Monte-Carlo evaluation of its discrimination performance on the basis of the likelihood ratio. An application for a pair of competing models in enzyme kinetics is given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Computing exact $D$-optimal designs by mixed integer second-order cone programming

Let the design of an experiment be represented by an $s$-dimensional vector $\mathbf {w}$ of weights with nonnegative components. Let the quality of $\mathbf {w}$ for the estimation of the parameters of the statistical model be measured by the criterion of $D$-optimality, defined as the $m$th root of the determinant of the information matrix $M(\mathbf {w})=\sum_{i=1}^sw_iA_iA_i^T$, where $A_i,i=1,\ldots,s$ are known matrices with $m$ rows. In this paper, we show that the criterion of $D$-optimality is second-order cone representable. As a result, the method of second-order cone programming can be used to compute an approximate $D$-optimal design with any system of linear constraints on the vector of weights. More importantly, the proposed characterization allows us to compute an exact $D$-optimal design, which is possible thanks to high-quality branch-and-cut solvers specialized to solve mixed integer second-order cone programming problems. Our results extend to the case of the criterion of $D_K$-optimality, which measures the quality of $\mathbf {w}$ for the estimation of a linear parameter subsystem defined by a full-rank coefficient matrix $K$. We prove that some other widely used criteria are also second-order cone representable, for instance, the criteria of $A$-, $A_K$-, $G$- and $I$-optimality. We present several numerical examples demonstrating the efficiency and general applicability of the proposed method. We show that in many cases the mixed integer second-order cone programming approach allows us to find a provably optimal exact design, while the standard heuristics systematically miss the optimum.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Approximate D-optimal Experimental Design with Simultaneous Size and Cost Constraints

Consider an experiment with a finite set of design points representing permissible trial conditions. Suppose that each trial is associated with a cost that depends on the selected design point. In this paper, we study the problem of constructing an approximate D-optimal experimental design with simultaneous restrictions on the size and on the total cost. For the problem of size-and-cost constrained D-optimality, we formulate an equivalence theorem and rules for the removal of redundant design points. We also propose a simple monotonically convergent "barycentric" algorithm that allows us to numerically compute a size-and-cost constrained approximate D-optimal design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Heuristic construction of exact experimental designs under multiple resource constraints

The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we introduce "resource constraints" as a general concept that covers many practical restrictions on experimental design. Second, for computing efficient exact designs of experiments under any combination of resource constraints, we propose a tabu search heuristic that uses some ideas of the Detmax procedure. To illustrate the scope and performance of our heuristic, we computed D-efficient designs for 1) a block model with limits on the numbers of blocks and on the availability of experimental material; 2) a quadratic regression model with simultaneous marginal and cost constraints; 3) a non-linear regression model with simultaneous direct and cost constraints. As we show, the proposed heuristic generates comparable or better results than algorithms specialized for computing optimal designs under less general constraints.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access