BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Radoslav Harman

Radoslav Harman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computationmath.STStatistics TheoryMethodologymath.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Removal of Redundant Candidate Points for the Exact D-Optimal Design Problem

One of the most common problems in statistical experimentation is computing D-optimal designs on large finite candidate sets. While optimal approximate (i.e., infinite-sample) designs can be efficiently computed using convex methods, constructing optimal exact (i.e., finite-sample) designs is a substantially more difficult integer-optimization problem. In this paper, we propose necessary conditions, based on approximate designs, that must be satisfied by any support point of a D-optimal exact design. These conditions enable rapid elimination of redundant candidate points without loss of optimality, thereby reducing memory requirements and runtime of subsequent exact design algorithms. In addition, we prove that for sufficiently large sample sizes, the supports of D-optimal exact designs are contained in a typically small maximum-variance set. We demonstrate the approach on randomly generated benchmark models with candidate sets up to 100 million points, and on commonly used constrained mixture models with up to one million points. The proposed approach reduces the initial candidate sets by several orders of magnitude, thereby making it possible to compute exact D-optimal designs for these problems via mixed-integer second-order cone programming, which provides optimality guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

A design criterion for symmetric model discrimination based on nominal confidence sets

Experimental design applications for discriminating between models have been hampered by the assumption to know beforehand which model is the true one, which is counter to the very aim of the experiment. Previous approaches to alleviate this requirement were either symmetrizations of asymmetric techniques, or Bayesian, minimax and sequential approaches. Here we present a genuinely symmetric criterion based on a linearized distance between mean-value surfaces and the newly introduced tool of flexible nominal confidence sets. We demonstrate the computational efficiency of the approach using the proposed criterion and provide a Monte-Carlo evaluation of its discrimination performance on the basis of the likelihood ratio. An application for a pair of competing models in enzyme kinetics is given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimal Approximate Designs for Comparison with Control in Dose-Escalation Studies

Consider an experiment, where a new drug is tested for the first time on human subjects - healthy volunteers. Such experiments are often performed as dose-escalation studies: a set of increasing doses is pre-selected, individuals are grouped into cohorts, and in each cohort, the dose number $i$ can be administered only if the dose number $i-1$ has already been tested in the previous cohort. If an adverse effect of a dose is observed, the experiment stops and thus no subjects are exposed to higher doses. In this paper, we assume that the response is affected both by the dose or placebo effects as well as by the cohort effects. We provide optimal approximate designs for selected optimality criteria ($E$-, $MV$- and $LV$-optimality) for estimating the effects of the drug doses compared with the placebo. In particular, we obtain the optimality of Senn designs and extended Senn designs with respect to multiple criteria.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Computing exact $D$-optimal designs by mixed integer second-order cone programming

Let the design of an experiment be represented by an $s$-dimensional vector $\mathbf {w}$ of weights with nonnegative components. Let the quality of $\mathbf {w}$ for the estimation of the parameters of the statistical model be measured by the criterion of $D$-optimality, defined as the $m$th root of the determinant of the information matrix $M(\mathbf {w})=\sum_{i=1}^sw_iA_iA_i^T$, where $A_i,i=1,\ldots,s$ are known matrices with $m$ rows. In this paper, we show that the criterion of $D$-optimality is second-order cone representable. As a result, the method of second-order cone programming can be used to compute an approximate $D$-optimal design with any system of linear constraints on the vector of weights. More importantly, the proposed characterization allows us to compute an exact $D$-optimal design, which is possible thanks to high-quality branch-and-cut solvers specialized to solve mixed integer second-order cone programming problems. Our results extend to the case of the criterion of $D_K$-optimality, which measures the quality of $\mathbf {w}$ for the estimation of a linear parameter subsystem defined by a full-rank coefficient matrix $K$. We prove that some other widely used criteria are also second-order cone representable, for instance, the criteria of $A$-, $A_K$-, $G$- and $I$-optimality. We present several numerical examples demonstrating the efficiency and general applicability of the proposed method. We show that in many cases the mixed integer second-order cone programming approach allows us to find a provably optimal exact design, while the standard heuristics systematically miss the optimum.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Optimal approximate designs for estimating treatment contrasts resistant to nuisance effects

Suppose that we intend to perform an experiment consisting of a set of independent trials. The mean value of the response of each trial is assumed to be equal to the sum of the effect of the treatment selected for the trial, and some nuisance effects, e.g., the effect of a time trend, or blocking. In this model, we examine optimal approximate designs for the estimation of a system of treatment contrasts, with respect to a wide range of optimality criteria. We show that it is necessary for any optimal design to attain the optimal treatment proportions, which may be obtained from the marginal model that excludes the nuisance effects. Moreover, we prove that for a design to be optimal, it is sufficient that it attains the optimal treatment proportions and satisfies conditions of resistance to nuisance effects. For selected natural choices of treatment contrasts and optimality criteria, we calculate the optimal treatment proportions and give an explicit form of optimal designs. In particular, we obtain optimal treatment proportions for comparison of a set of new treatments with a set of controls. The results allow us to construct a method of calculating optimal approximate designs with a small support by means of linear programming. As a consequence, we can construct efficient exact designs by a simple heuristic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Approximate D-optimal Experimental Design with Simultaneous Size and Cost Constraints

Consider an experiment with a finite set of design points representing permissible trial conditions. Suppose that each trial is associated with a cost that depends on the selected design point. In this paper, we study the problem of constructing an approximate D-optimal experimental design with simultaneous restrictions on the size and on the total cost. For the problem of size-and-cost constrained D-optimality, we formulate an equivalence theorem and rules for the removal of redundant design points. We also propose a simple monotonically convergent "barycentric" algorithm that allows us to numerically compute a size-and-cost constrained approximate D-optimal design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Heuristic construction of exact experimental designs under multiple resource constraints

The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we introduce "resource constraints" as a general concept that covers many practical restrictions on experimental design. Second, for computing efficient exact designs of experiments under any combination of resource constraints, we propose a tabu search heuristic that uses some ideas of the Detmax procedure. To illustrate the scope and performance of our heuristic, we computed D-efficient designs for 1) a block model with limits on the numbers of blocks and on the availability of experimental material; 2) a quadratic regression model with simultaneous marginal and cost constraints; 3) a non-linear regression model with simultaneous direct and cost constraints. As we show, the proposed heuristic generates comparable or better results than algorithms specialized for computing optimal designs under less general constraints.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access