BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Samuel Rosa

Samuel Rosa contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Removal of Redundant Candidate Points for the Exact D-Optimal Design Problem

One of the most common problems in statistical experimentation is computing D-optimal designs on large finite candidate sets. While optimal approximate (i.e., infinite-sample) designs can be efficiently computed using convex methods, constructing optimal exact (i.e., finite-sample) designs is a substantially more difficult integer-optimization problem. In this paper, we propose necessary conditions, based on approximate designs, that must be satisfied by any support point of a D-optimal exact design. These conditions enable rapid elimination of redundant candidate points without loss of optimality, thereby reducing memory requirements and runtime of subsequent exact design algorithms. In addition, we prove that for sufficiently large sample sizes, the supports of D-optimal exact designs are contained in a typically small maximum-variance set. We demonstrate the approach on randomly generated benchmark models with candidate sets up to 100 million points, and on commonly used constrained mixture models with up to one million points. The proposed approach reduces the initial candidate sets by several orders of magnitude, thereby making it possible to compute exact D-optimal designs for these problems via mixed-integer second-order cone programming, which provides optimality guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On weighted optimality of experimental designs

When the experimental objective is expressed by a set of estimable functions, and any eigenvalue-based optimality criterion is selected, we prove the equivalence of the recently introduced weighted optimality and the 'standard' optimality criteria for estimating this set of functions of interest. Also, given a weighted eigenvalue-based criterion, we construct a system of estimable functions, so that the optimality for estimating this system of functions is equivalent to the weighted optimality. This allows one to use the large body of existing theoretical and computational results for the standard optimality criteria for estimating a system of interest to derive theorems and numerical algorithms for the weighted optimality of experimental designs. Moreover, we extend the theory of weighted optimality so that it captures the experimental objective consisting of any system of estimable functions, which was not the case in the literature on weighted optimality so far. For any set of estimable functions, we propose a corresponding weight matrix of a simple form, and with a straightforward interpretation. Given a set of estimable functions with their corresponding weights, we show that it is useful to distinguish between the primary weights selected by the experimenters and the secondary weights implied by the weight matrix.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimal Approximate Designs for Comparison with Control in Dose-Escalation Studies

Consider an experiment, where a new drug is tested for the first time on human subjects - healthy volunteers. Such experiments are often performed as dose-escalation studies: a set of increasing doses is pre-selected, individuals are grouped into cohorts, and in each cohort, the dose number $i$ can be administered only if the dose number $i-1$ has already been tested in the previous cohort. If an adverse effect of a dose is observed, the experiment stops and thus no subjects are exposed to higher doses. In this paper, we assume that the response is affected both by the dose or placebo effects as well as by the cohort effects. We provide optimal approximate designs for selected optimality criteria ($E$-, $MV$- and $LV$-optimality) for estimating the effects of the drug doses compared with the placebo. In particular, we obtain the optimality of Senn designs and extended Senn designs with respect to multiple criteria.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimal designs for treatment comparisons represented by graphs

Consider an experiment consisting of a set of independent trials for comparing a set of treatments. In each trial, one treatment is chosen and the mean response of the trial is equal to the effect of the chosen treatment. We examine the optimal approximate designs for the estimation of a system of treatment contrasts under such model. These approximate treatment designs can be used to provide optimal treatment proportions for designs in more general models with nuisance effects (e.g., time trend, effects of blocks). For any system of pairwise treatment comparisons, we propose to represent such system by a graph. In particular, we represent the treatment designs for these sets of contrasts by the inverses of the vertex weights in the corresponding graph G. We show that then the positive eigenvalues of the information matrix of a treatment design are inverse to the positive eigenvalues of the vertex-weighted Laplacian of G. Note that such representation of treatment designs differs from the well known graph representation of block designs, which are represented by edges. We provide a graph-theoretic interpretation of the D-, A- and E-optimality for estimating sets of pairwise comparisons; as well as some optimality results for both the systems of pairwise comparisons and the general systems of treatment contrasts. Moreover, we provide a class of 'symmetric' systems of treatment contrasts for which the uniform treatment design is optimal with respect to a wide range of optimality criteria.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Optimal approximate designs for estimating treatment contrasts resistant to nuisance effects

Suppose that we intend to perform an experiment consisting of a set of independent trials. The mean value of the response of each trial is assumed to be equal to the sum of the effect of the treatment selected for the trial, and some nuisance effects, e.g., the effect of a time trend, or blocking. In this model, we examine optimal approximate designs for the estimation of a system of treatment contrasts, with respect to a wide range of optimality criteria. We show that it is necessary for any optimal design to attain the optimal treatment proportions, which may be obtained from the marginal model that excludes the nuisance effects. Moreover, we prove that for a design to be optimal, it is sufficient that it attains the optimal treatment proportions and satisfies conditions of resistance to nuisance effects. For selected natural choices of treatment contrasts and optimality criteria, we calculate the optimal treatment proportions and give an explicit form of optimal designs. In particular, we obtain optimal treatment proportions for comparison of a set of new treatments with a set of controls. The results allow us to construct a method of calculating optimal approximate designs with a small support by means of linear programming. As a consequence, we can construct efficient exact designs by a simple heuristic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access