BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

R. Ravi

R. Ravi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Social and Information NetworksArtificial IntelligenceData Structures and AlgorithmsMultiagent SystemsRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Informed Steiner Trees: Sampling and Pruning for Multi-Goal Path Finding in High Dimensions

We interleave sampling based motion planning methods with pruning ideas from minimum spanning tree algorithms to develop a new approach for solving a Multi-Goal Path Finding (MGPF) problem in high dimensional spaces. The approach alternates between sampling points from selected regions in the search space and de-emphasizing regions that may not lead to good solutions for MGPF. Our approach provides an asymptotic, 2-approximation guarantee for MGPF. We also present extensive numerical results to illustrate the advantages of our proposed approach over uniform sampling in terms of the quality of the solutions found and computation speed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Timeliness Through Telephones: Approximating Information Freshness in Vector Clock Models

We consider an information dissemination problem where the root of an undirected graph constantly updates its information. The goal is to keep every other node in the graph about the root as freshly informed as possible. Our synchronous information spreading model uses telephone calls at each time step, in which any node can call at most one neighbor, thus forming a matching over which information is transmitted at each step. We introduce two problems in minimizing two natural objectives (Maximum and Average) of the latency of the root's information at all nodes in the network. After deriving a simple reduction from the maximum rooted latency problem to the well-studied minimum broadcast time problem, we focus on the average rooted latency version. We introduce a natural problem of finding a finite schedule that minimizes the average broadcast time from a root. We show that any average rooted latency induces a solution to this average broadcast problem within a constant factor and conversely, this average broadcast time is within a logarithmic factor of the average rooted latency. Then, by approximating the average broadcast time problem via rounding a time-indexed linear programming relaxation, we obtain a logarithmic approximation to the average latency problem. Surprisingly, we show that using the average broadcast time for average rooted latency introduces this necessary logarithmic factor overhead even in trees. We overcome this hurdle and give a 40-approximation for trees. For this, we design an algorithm to find near-optimal locally-periodic schedules in trees where each vertex receives information from its parent in regular intervals. On the other side, we show how such well-behaved schedules approximate the optimal schedule within a constant factor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unit Perturbations in Budgeted Spanning Tree Problems

The minimum spanning tree of a graph is a well-studied structure that is the basis of countless graph theoretic and optimization problem. We study the minimum spanning tree (MST) perturbation problem where the goal is to spend a fixed budget to increase the weight of edges in order to increase the weight of the MST as much as possible. Two popular models of perturbation are bulk and continuous. In the bulk model, the weight of any edge can be increased exactly once to some predetermined weight. In the continuous model, one can pay a fractional amount of cost to increase the weight of any edge by a proportional amount. Frederickson and Solis-Oba \cite{FS96} have studied these two models and showed that bulk perturbation for MST is as hard as the $k$-cut problem while the continuous perturbation model is solvable in poly-time. In this paper, we study an intermediate unit perturbation variation of this problem where the weight of each edge can be increased many times but at an integral unit amount every time. We provide an $(opt/2 -1)$-approximation in polynomial time where $opt$ is the optimal increase in the weight. We also study the associated dual targeted version of the problem where the goal is to increase the weight of the MST by a target amount while minimizing the cost of perturbation. We provide a $2$-approximation for this variation. Furthermore we show that assuming the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis, both problems are hard to approximate. We also point out an error in the proof provided by Frederickson and Solis-Oba in \cite{FS96} with regard to their solution to the continuous perturbation model. Although their algorithm is correct, their analysis is flawed. We provide a correct proof here.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access