BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Philip S. Marcus

Philip S. Marcus contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.flu-dynphysics.ao-phastro-ph.EPphysics.geo-phastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRnlin.CD

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Stable 3-dimensional Vortex Families Consistent with Jovian Observations Including the Great Red Spot

Detailed observations of the velocities of Jovian vortices exist at only one height in the atmosphere, so their vertical structures are poorly understood. This motivates this study that computes stable 3-dimensional, long-lived planetary vortices that satisfy the equations of motion. We solve the anelastic equations with a high-resolution pseudo-spectral method using the observed Jovian atmospheric temperatures and zonal flow. We examine several families of vortices and find that {\it constant-vorticity} vortices, which have nearly-uniform vorticity as a function of height and horizontal areas that go to zero at their tops and bottoms, converge to stable vortices that look like the Great Red Spot (GRS) and other Jovian anticyclones. In contrast, the {\it constant-area} vortices proposed in previous studies, which have nearly-uniform areas as a function of height and vertical vorticities that go to zero at their tops and bottoms, are far from equilibrium, break apart, and converge to {\it constant-vorticity} vortices. Our late-time vortices show unexpected properties. Vortices that are initially non-hollow become hollow (i.e., have local minima of vertical vorticity at their centers), which is a feature of the GRS that cannot be explained with 2-dimensional simulations. The central axes of the final vortices align with the planetary-spin axis even if they initially align with the local direction of gravity. We present scaling laws for how vortex properties change with the Rossby number and other non-dimensional parameters. We analytically prove that the horizontal mid-plane of a stable vortex must lie at a height above the top of the convective zone.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Self-Replicating Three-Dimensional Vortices in Neutrally-Stable Stratified Rotating Shear Flows

A previously unknown instability creates space-filling lattices of 3D vortices in linearly-stable, rotating, stratified shear flows. The instability starts from an easily-excited critical layer. The layer intensifies by drawing energy from the background shear and rolls-up into vortices that excite new critical layers and vortices. The vortices self-similarly replicate to create lattices of turbulent vortices. The vortices persist for all time. This self-replication occurs in stratified Couette flows and in the dead zones of protoplanetary disks where it can de-stabilize Keplerian flows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Universal Aspect Ratio of Vortices in Rotating Stratifi?ed Flows: Experiments and Observations

We validate a new law for the aspect ratio $α= H/L$ of vortices in a rotating, stratified flow, where $H$ and $L$ are the vertical half-height and horizontal length scale of the vortices. The aspect ratio depends not only on the Coriolis parameter f and buoyancy (or Brunt-Vaisala) frequency $\bar{N}$ of the background flow, but also on the buoyancy frequency $N_c$ within the vortex and on the Rossby number $Ro$ of the vortex such that $α= f \sqrt{[Ro (1 + Ro)/(N_c^2- \bar{N}^2)]}$. This law for $α$ is obeyed precisely by the exact equilibrium solution of the inviscid Boussinesq equations that we show to be a useful model of our laboratory vortices. The law is valid for both cyclones and anticyclones. Our anticyclones are generated by injecting fluid into a rotating tank filled with linearly-stratified salt water. The vortices are far from the top and bottom boundaries of the tank, so there is no Ekman circulation. In one set of experiments, the vortices viscously decay, but as they do, they continue to obey our law for $α$, which decreases over time. In a second set of experiments, the vortices are sustained by a slow continuous injection after they form, so they evolve more slowly and have larger |Ro|, but they also obey our law for $α$. The law for $α$ is not only validated by our experiments, but is also shown to be consistent with observations of the aspect ratios of Atlantic meddies and Jupiter's Great Red Spot and Oval BA. The relationship for $α$ is derived and examined numerically in a companion paper by Hassanzadeh et al. (2012).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Universal Aspect Ratio of Vortices in Rotating Stratified Flows: Theory and Simulation

We derive a relationship for the vortex aspect ratio $α$ (vertical half-thickness over horizontal length scale) for steady and slowly evolving vortices in rotating stratified fluids, as a function of the Brunt-Vaisala frequencies within the vortex $N_c$ and in the background fluid outside the vortex $\bar{N}$, the Coriolis parameter $f$, and the Rossby number $Ro$ of the vortex: $α^2 = Ro(1+Ro) f^2/(N_c^2-\bar{N}^2)$. This relation is valid for cyclones and anticyclones in either the cyclostrophic or geostrophic regimes; it works with vortices in Boussinesq fluids or ideal gases, and the background density gradient need not be uniform. Our relation for $α$ has many consequences for equilibrium vortices in rotating stratified flows. For example, cyclones must have $N_c^2 > \bar{N}^2$; weak anticyclones (with $|Ro| < 1$) must have $N_c^2 < \bar{N}^2; and strong anticyclones must have $N_c^2 > \bar{N}^2$. We verify our relation for $α$ with numerical simulations of the three-dimensional Boussinesq equations for a wide variety of vortices, including: vortices that are initially in (dissipationless) equilibrium and then evolve due to an imposed weak viscous dissipation or density radiation; anticyclones created by the geostrophic adjustment of a patch of locally mixed density; cyclones created by fluid suction from a small localised region; vortices created from the remnants of the violent breakups of columnar vortices; and weakly non-axisymmetric vortices. The values of the aspect ratios of our numerically-computed vortices validate our relationship for $α$, and generally they differ significantly from the values obtained from the much-cited conjecture that $α= f/\bar{N}$ in quasi-geostrophic vortices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access