Paper detail

The Universal Aspect Ratio of Vortices in Rotating Stratified Flows: Theory and Simulation

We derive a relationship for the vortex aspect ratio $α$ (vertical half-thickness over horizontal length scale) for steady and slowly evolving vortices in rotating stratified fluids, as a function of the Brunt-Vaisala frequencies within the vortex $N_c$ and in the background fluid outside the vortex $\bar{N}$, the Coriolis parameter $f$, and the Rossby number $Ro$ of the vortex: $α^2 = Ro(1+Ro) f^2/(N_c^2-\bar{N}^2)$. This relation is valid for cyclones and anticyclones in either the cyclostrophic or geostrophic regimes; it works with vortices in Boussinesq fluids or ideal gases, and the background density gradient need not be uniform. Our relation for $α$ has many consequences for equilibrium vortices in rotating stratified flows. For example, cyclones must have $N_c^2 > \bar{N}^2$; weak anticyclones (with $|Ro| < 1$) must have $N_c^2 < \bar{N}^2; and strong anticyclones must have $N_c^2 > \bar{N}^2$. We verify our relation for $α$ with numerical simulations of the three-dimensional Boussinesq equations for a wide variety of vortices, including: vortices that are initially in (dissipationless) equilibrium and then evolve due to an imposed weak viscous dissipation or density radiation; anticyclones created by the geostrophic adjustment of a patch of locally mixed density; cyclones created by fluid suction from a small localised region; vortices created from the remnants of the violent breakups of columnar vortices; and weakly non-axisymmetric vortices. The values of the aspect ratios of our numerically-computed vortices validate our relationship for $α$, and generally they differ significantly from the values obtained from the much-cited conjecture that $α= f/\bar{N}$ in quasi-geostrophic vortices.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.