Source author record

Parul Gupta

Parul Gupta appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

FakeBuster: A DeepFakes Detection Tool for Video Conferencing Scenarios

This paper proposes a new DeepFake detector FakeBuster for detecting impostors during video conferencing and manipulated faces on social media. FakeBuster is a standalone deep learning based solution, which enables a user to detect if another person's video is manipulated or spoofed during a video conferencing based meeting. This tool is independent of video conferencing solutions and has been tested with Zoom and Skype applications. It uses a 3D convolutional neural network for predicting video segment-wise fakeness scores. The network is trained on a combination of datasets such as Deeperforensics, DFDC, VoxCeleb, and deepfake videos created using locally captured (for video conferencing scenarios) images. This leads to different environments and perturbations in the dataset, which improves the generalization of the deepfake network.

preprint2020arXiv

The eyes know it: FakeET -- An Eye-tracking Database to Understand Deepfake Perception

We present \textbf{FakeET}-- an eye-tracking database to understand human visual perception of \emph{deepfake} videos. Given that the principal purpose of deepfakes is to deceive human observers, FakeET is designed to understand and evaluate the ease with which viewers can detect synthetic video artifacts. FakeET contains viewing patterns compiled from 40 users via the \emph{Tobii} desktop eye-tracker for 811 videos from the \textit{Google Deepfake} dataset, with a minimum of two viewings per video. Additionally, EEG responses acquired via the \emph{Emotiv} sensor are also available. The compiled data confirms (a) distinct eye movement characteristics for \emph{real} vs \emph{fake} videos; (b) utility of the eye-track saliency maps for spatial forgery localization and detection, and (c) Error Related Negativity (ERN) triggers in the EEG responses, and the ability of the \emph{raw} EEG signal to distinguish between \emph{real} and \emph{fake} videos.

preprint2014arXiv

Towards Refactoring DMARF and GIPSY OSS

We present here an exploratory and investigatory study of the requirements, design, and implementation of two opensource software systems: the Distributed Modular Audio Recognition Framework (DMARF), and the General Intensional Programming System (GIPSY). The inception, development, and evolution of the two systems have overlapped and in terms of the involved developers, as well as in their applications. DMARF is a platform independent collection of algorithms for pattern recognition, identification and signal processing in audio and natural language text samples, become a rich platform for the research community in particular to use, test, and compare various algorithms in the broad field of pattern recognition and machine learning. Intended as a platform for intensional programming, GIPSY's inception was intended to push the field of intensional programming further, overcoming limitations in the available tools two decades ago. In this study, we present background research into the two systems and elaborate on their motivations and the requirements that drove and shaped their design and implementation. We subsequently elaborate in more depth about various aspects their architectural design, including the elucidation of some use cases, domain models, and the overall class diagram of the major components. Moreover, we investigated existing design patterns in both systems and provided a detailed view of the involved components in such patterns. Furthermore, we delve deeper into the guts of both systems, identifying code smells and suggesting possible refactorings. Patchsets of implementations of selected refactorings have been collected into patchsets and could be committed into future releases of the two systems, pending a review and approval of the developers and maintainers of DMARF and GIPSY.