Paper detail

Towards Refactoring DMARF and GIPSY OSS

We present here an exploratory and investigatory study of the requirements, design, and implementation of two opensource software systems: the Distributed Modular Audio Recognition Framework (DMARF), and the General Intensional Programming System (GIPSY). The inception, development, and evolution of the two systems have overlapped and in terms of the involved developers, as well as in their applications. DMARF is a platform independent collection of algorithms for pattern recognition, identification and signal processing in audio and natural language text samples, become a rich platform for the research community in particular to use, test, and compare various algorithms in the broad field of pattern recognition and machine learning. Intended as a platform for intensional programming, GIPSY's inception was intended to push the field of intensional programming further, overcoming limitations in the available tools two decades ago. In this study, we present background research into the two systems and elaborate on their motivations and the requirements that drove and shaped their design and implementation. We subsequently elaborate in more depth about various aspects their architectural design, including the elucidation of some use cases, domain models, and the overall class diagram of the major components. Moreover, we investigated existing design patterns in both systems and provided a detailed view of the involved components in such patterns. Furthermore, we delve deeper into the guts of both systems, identifying code smells and suggesting possible refactorings. Patchsets of implementations of selected refactorings have been collected into patchsets and could be committed into future releases of the two systems, pending a review and approval of the developers and maintainers of DMARF and GIPSY.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.