Researcher profile

Omri Weinstein

Omri Weinstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Faster Interior-Point Method for Sum-of-Squares Optimization

We present a faster interior-point method for optimizing sum-of-squares (SOS) polynomials, which are a central tool in polynomial optimization and capture convex programming in the Lasserre hierarchy. Let $p = \sum_i q^2_i$ be an $n$-variate SOS polynomial of degree $2d$. Denoting by $L := \binom{n+d}{d}$ and $U := \binom{n+2d}{2d}$ the dimensions of the vector spaces in which $q_i$'s and $p$ live respectively, our algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(LU^{1.87})$. This is polynomially faster than state-of-art SOS and semidefinite programming solvers, which achieve runtime $\tilde{O}(L^{0.5}\min\{U^{2.37}, L^{4.24}\})$. The centerpiece of our algorithm is a dynamic data structure for maintaining the inverse of the Hessian of the SOS barrier function under the polynomial interpolant basis, which efficiently extends to multivariate SOS optimization, and requires maintaining spectral approximations to low-rank perturbations of elementwise (Hadamard) products. This is the main challenge and departure from recent IPM breakthroughs using inverse-maintenance, where low-rank updates to the slack matrix readily imply the same for the Hessian matrix.

preprint2022arXiv

Fast Distance Oracles for Any Symmetric Norm

In the Distance Oracle problem, the goal is to preprocess $n$ vectors $x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_n$ in a $d$-dimensional metric space $(\mathbb{X}^d, \| \cdot \|_l)$ into a cheap data structure, so that given a query vector $q \in \mathbb{X}^d$ and a subset $S\subseteq [n]$ of the input data points, all distances $\| q - x_i \|_l$ for $x_i\in S$ can be quickly approximated (faster than the trivial $\sim d|S|$ query time). This primitive is a basic subroutine in machine learning, data mining and similarity search applications. In the case of $\ell_p$ norms, the problem is well understood, and optimal data structures are known for most values of $p$. Our main contribution is a fast $(1+\varepsilon)$ distance oracle for any symmetric norm $\|\cdot\|_l$. This class includes $\ell_p$ norms and Orlicz norms as special cases, as well as other norms used in practice, e.g. top-$k$ norms, max-mixture and sum-mixture of $\ell_p$ norms, small-support norms and the box-norm. We propose a novel data structure with $\tilde{O}(n (d + \mathrm{mmc}(l)^2 ) )$ preprocessing time and space, and $t_q = \tilde{O}(d + |S| \cdot \mathrm{mmc}(l)^2)$ query time, for computing distances to a subset $S$ of data points, where $\mathrm{mmc}(l)$ is a complexity-measure (concentration modulus) of the symmetric norm. When $l = \ell_{p}$ , this runtime matches the aforementioned state-of-art oracles.

preprint2020arXiv

Faster Dynamic Matrix Inverse for Faster LPs

Motivated by recent Linear Programming solvers, we design dynamic data structures for maintaining the inverse of an $n\times n$ real matrix under $\textit{low-rank}$ updates, with polynomially faster amortized running time. Our data structure is based on a recursive application of the Woodbury-Morrison identity for implementing $\textit{cascading}$ low-rank updates, combined with recent sketching technology. Our techniques and amortized analysis of multi-level partial updates, may be of broader interest to dynamic matrix problems. This data structure leads to the fastest known LP solver for general (dense) linear programs, improving the running time of the recent algorithms of (Cohen et al.'19, Lee et al.'19, Brand'20) from $O^*(n^{2+ \max\{\frac{1}{6}, ω-2, \frac{1-α}{2}\}})$ to $O^*(n^{2+\max\{\frac{1}{18}, ω-2, \frac{1-α}{2}\}})$, where $ω$ and $α$ are the fast matrix multiplication exponent and its dual. Hence, under the common belief that $ω\approx 2$ and $α\approx 1$, our LP solver runs in $O^*(n^{2.055})$ time instead of $O^*(n^{2.16})$.

preprint2020arXiv

Settling the relationship between Wilber's bounds for dynamic optimality

In FOCS 1986, Wilber proposed two combinatorial lower bounds on the operational cost of any binary search tree (BST) for a given access sequence $X \in [n]^m$. Both bounds play a central role in the ongoing pursuit of the dynamic optimality conjecture (Sleator and Tarjan, 1985), but their relationship remained unknown for more than three decades. We show that Wilber's Funnel bound dominates his Alternation bound for all $X$, and give a tight $Θ(\lg\lg n)$ separation for some $X$, answering Wilber's conjecture and an open problem of Iacono, Demaine et. al. The main ingredient of the proof is a new "symmetric" characterization of Wilber's Funnel bound, which proves that it is invariant under rotations of $X$. We use this characterization to provide initial indication that the Funnel bound matches the Independent Rectangle bound (Demaine et al., 2009), by proving that when the Funnel bound is constant, $\mathsf{IRB}_{\diagup\hspace{-.6em}\square}$ is linear. To the best of our knowledge, our results provide the first progress on Wilber's conjecture that the Funnel bound is dynamically optimal (1986).

preprint2012arXiv

On the Furthest Hyperplane Problem and Maximal Margin Clustering

This paper introduces the Furthest Hyperplane Problem (FHP), which is an unsupervised counterpart of Support Vector Machines. Given a set of n points in Rd, the objective is to produce the hyperplane (passing through the origin) which maximizes the separation margin, that is, the minimal distance between the hyperplane and any input point. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper achieving provable results regarding FHP. We provide both lower and upper bounds to this NP-hard problem. First, we give a simple randomized algorithm whose running time is n^O(1/θ^2) where θ is the optimal separation margin. We show that its exponential dependency on 1/θ^2 is tight, up to sub-polynomial factors, assuming SAT cannot be solved in sub-exponential time. Next, we give an efficient approxima- tion algorithm. For any α \in [0, 1], the algorithm produces a hyperplane whose distance from at least 1 - 5α fraction of the points is at least α times the optimal separation margin. Finally, we show that FHP does not admit a PTAS by presenting a gap preserving reduction from a particular version of the PCP theorem.

preprint2011arXiv

Approximating the Influence of a monotone Boolean function in O(\sqrt{n}) query complexity

The {\em Total Influence} ({\em Average Sensitivity) of a discrete function is one of its fundamental measures. We study the problem of approximating the total influence of a monotone Boolean function \ifnum\plusminus=1 $f: \{\pm1\}^n \longrightarrow \{\pm1\}$, \else $f: \bitset^n \to \bitset$, \fi which we denote by $I[f]$. We present a randomized algorithm that approximates the influence of such functions to within a multiplicative factor of $(1\pm \eps)$ by performing $O(\frac{\sqrt{n}\log n}{I[f]} \poly(1/\eps)) $ queries. % \mnote{D: say something about technique?} We also prove a lower bound of % $Ω(\frac{\sqrt{n/\log n}}{I[f]})$ $Ω(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n \cdot I[f]})$ on the query complexity of any constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem (which holds for $I[f] = Ω(1)$), % and $I[f] = O(\sqrt{n}/\log n)$), hence showing that our algorithm is almost optimal in terms of its dependence on $n$. For general functions we give a lower bound of $Ω(\frac{n}{I[f]})$, which matches the complexity of a simple sampling algorithm.