Researcher profile

Shunhua Jiang

Shunhua Jiang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Faster Interior-Point Method for Sum-of-Squares Optimization

We present a faster interior-point method for optimizing sum-of-squares (SOS) polynomials, which are a central tool in polynomial optimization and capture convex programming in the Lasserre hierarchy. Let $p = \sum_i q^2_i$ be an $n$-variate SOS polynomial of degree $2d$. Denoting by $L := \binom{n+d}{d}$ and $U := \binom{n+2d}{2d}$ the dimensions of the vector spaces in which $q_i$'s and $p$ live respectively, our algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(LU^{1.87})$. This is polynomially faster than state-of-art SOS and semidefinite programming solvers, which achieve runtime $\tilde{O}(L^{0.5}\min\{U^{2.37}, L^{4.24}\})$. The centerpiece of our algorithm is a dynamic data structure for maintaining the inverse of the Hessian of the SOS barrier function under the polynomial interpolant basis, which efficiently extends to multivariate SOS optimization, and requires maintaining spectral approximations to low-rank perturbations of elementwise (Hadamard) products. This is the main challenge and departure from recent IPM breakthroughs using inverse-maintenance, where low-rank updates to the slack matrix readily imply the same for the Hessian matrix.

preprint2022arXiv

The Energy Complexity of Las Vegas Leader Election

We consider the time and energy complexities of randomized leader election in a multiple-access channel, where the number of devices $n\geq 2$ is unknown. It is well-known that for polynomial-time randomized leader election algorithms with success probability $1-1/poly(n)$, the optimal energy complexity is $Θ(\log\log^*n)$ if receivers can detect collisions, and $Θ(\log^*n)$ otherwise. Without collision detection, all existing randomized leader election algorithms using $o(\log\log n)$ energy are Monte Carlo in that they may fail with some small probability, and they may consume unbounded energy and never halt when they fail. Though the optimal energy complexity of leader election appears to be settled, it is still an open question to attain the optimal $O(\log^*n)$ energy complexity by an efficient Las Vegas algorithm that never fails. In this paper we address this fundamental question. $\textbf{Separation between Monte Carlo and Las Vegas:}$ Without collision detection, we prove that any Las Vegas leader election algorithm with finite expected time complexity must use $Ω(\log\log n)$ energy, establishing a large separation between Monte Carlo and Las Vegas algorithms. $\textbf{Exponential improvement with sender collision detection:}$ In the setting where senders can detect collisions, we design a new leader election algorithm that finishes in $O(\log^{1+ε}n)$ time and uses $O(ε^{-1}\log\log\log n)$ energy in expectation, showing that sender collision detection helps improve the energy complexity exponentially. $\textbf{Optimal deterministic leader election algorithm:}$ As a side result, via derandomization, we show a new deterministic algorithm that takes $O(n\log(N/n))$ time and $O(\log(N/n))$ energy to elect a leader from $n$ devices, where each device has a unique identifier in $[N]$. This algorithm is time-optimal and energy-optimal.

preprint2022arXiv

Tight Revenue Gaps among Multi-Unit Mechanisms

This paper considers Bayesian revenue maximization in the $k$-unit setting, where a monopolist seller has $k$ copies of an indivisible item and faces $n$ unit-demand buyers (whose value distributions can be non-identical). Four basic mechanisms among others have been widely employed in practice and widely studied in the literature: {\sf Myerson Auction}, {\sf Sequential Posted-Pricing}, {\sf $(k + 1)$-th Price Auction with Anonymous Reserve}, and {\sf Anonymous Pricing}. Regarding a pair of mechanisms, we investigate the largest possible ratio between the two revenues (a.k.a.\ the revenue gap), over all possible value distributions of the buyers. Divide these four mechanisms into two groups: (i)~the discriminating mechanism group, {\sf Myerson Auction} and {\sf Sequential Posted-Pricing}, and (ii)~the anonymous mechanism group, {\sf Anonymous Reserve} and {\sf Anonymous Pricing}. Within one group, the involved two mechanisms have an asymptotically tight revenue gap of $1 + Θ(1 / \sqrt{k})$. In contrast, any two mechanisms from the different groups have an asymptotically tight revenue gap of $Θ(\log k)$.

preprint2020arXiv

Faster Dynamic Matrix Inverse for Faster LPs

Motivated by recent Linear Programming solvers, we design dynamic data structures for maintaining the inverse of an $n\times n$ real matrix under $\textit{low-rank}$ updates, with polynomially faster amortized running time. Our data structure is based on a recursive application of the Woodbury-Morrison identity for implementing $\textit{cascading}$ low-rank updates, combined with recent sketching technology. Our techniques and amortized analysis of multi-level partial updates, may be of broader interest to dynamic matrix problems. This data structure leads to the fastest known LP solver for general (dense) linear programs, improving the running time of the recent algorithms of (Cohen et al.'19, Lee et al.'19, Brand'20) from $O^*(n^{2+ \max\{\frac{1}{6}, ω-2, \frac{1-α}{2}\}})$ to $O^*(n^{2+\max\{\frac{1}{18}, ω-2, \frac{1-α}{2}\}})$, where $ω$ and $α$ are the fast matrix multiplication exponent and its dual. Hence, under the common belief that $ω\approx 2$ and $α\approx 1$, our LP solver runs in $O^*(n^{2.055})$ time instead of $O^*(n^{2.16})$.