BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Oleg Sokolsky

Oleg Sokolsky appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceSoftware EngineeringArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningCryptography and Securityeess.SYFormal Languages and Automata Theorymath.STStatistics TheorySystems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Framework for Checkpointing and Recovery of Hierarchical Cyber-Physical Systems

This paper tackles the problem of making complex resource-constrained cyber-physical systems (CPS) resilient to sensor anomalies. In particular, we present a framework for checkpointing and roll-forward recovery of state-estimates in nonlinear, hierarchical CPS with anomalous sensor data. We introduce three checkpointing paradigms for ensuring different levels of checkpointing consistency across the hierarchy. Our framework has algorithms implementing the consistent paradigm to perform accurate recovery in a time-efficient manner while managing the tradeoff with system resources and handling the interplay between diverse anomaly detection systems across the hierarchy. Further in this work, we detail bounds on the recovered state-estimate error, maximum tolerable anomaly duration and the accuracy-resource gap that results from the aforementioned tradeoff. We explore use-cases for our framework and evaluate it on a case study of a simulated ground robot to show that it scales to multiple hierarchies and performs better than an extended Kalman filter (EKF) that does not incorporate a checkpointing procedure during sensor anomalies. We conclude the work with a discussion on extending the proposed framework to distributed systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions

Closed-loop verification of cyber-physical systems with neural network controllers offers strong safety guarantees under certain assumptions. It is, however, difficult to determine whether these guarantees apply at run time because verification assumptions may be violated. To predict safety violations in a verified system, we propose a three-step confidence composition (CoCo) framework for monitoring verification assumptions. First, we represent the sufficient condition for verified safety with a propositional logical formula over assumptions. Second, we build calibrated confidence monitors that evaluate the probability that each assumption holds. Third, we obtain the confidence in the verification guarantees by composing the assumption monitors using a composition function suitable for the logical formula. Our CoCo framework provides theoretical bounds on the calibration and conservatism of compositional monitors. Two case studies show that compositional monitors are calibrated better than their constituents and successfully predict safety violations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

iDECODe: In-distribution Equivariance for Conformal Out-of-distribution Detection

Machine learning methods such as deep neural networks (DNNs), despite their success across different domains, are known to often generate incorrect predictions with high confidence on inputs outside their training distribution. The deployment of DNNs in safety-critical domains requires detection of out-of-distribution (OOD) data so that DNNs can abstain from making predictions on those. A number of methods have been recently developed for OOD detection, but there is still room for improvement. We propose the new method iDECODe, leveraging in-distribution equivariance for conformal OOD detection. It relies on a novel base non-conformity measure and a new aggregation method, used in the inductive conformal anomaly detection framework, thereby guaranteeing a bounded false detection rate. We demonstrate the efficacy of iDECODe by experiments on image and audio datasets, obtaining state-of-the-art results. We also show that iDECODe can detect adversarial examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Monotonic Safety for Scalable and Data-Efficient Probabilistic Safety Analysis

Autonomous systems with machine learning-based perception can exhibit unpredictable behaviors that are difficult to quantify, let alone verify. Such behaviors are convenient to capture in probabilistic models, but probabilistic model checking of such models is difficult to scale -- largely due to the non-determinism added to models as a prerequisite for provable conservatism. Statistical model checking (SMC) has been proposed to address the scalability issue. However it requires large amounts of data to account for the aforementioned non-determinism, which in turn limits its scalability. This work introduces a general technique for reduction of non-determinism based on assumptions of "monotonic safety'", which define a partial order between system states in terms of their probabilities of being safe. We exploit these assumptions to remove non-determinism from controller/plant models to drastically speed up probabilistic model checking and statistical model checking while providing provably conservative estimates as long as the safety is indeed monotonic. Our experiments demonstrate model-checking speed-ups of an order of magnitude while maintaining acceptable accuracy and require much less data for accurate estimates when running SMC -- even when monotonic safety does not perfectly hold and provable conservatism is not achieved.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

PAC-Wrap: Semi-Supervised PAC Anomaly Detection

Anomaly detection is essential for preventing hazardous outcomes for safety-critical applications like autonomous driving. Given their safety-criticality, these applications benefit from provable bounds on various errors in anomaly detection. To achieve this goal in the semi-supervised setting, we propose to provide Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) guarantees on the false negative and false positive detection rates for anomaly detection algorithms. Our method (PAC-Wrap) can wrap around virtually any existing semi-supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection method, endowing it with rigorous guarantees. Our experiments with various anomaly detectors and datasets indicate that PAC-Wrap is broadly effective.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Monitoring Assumptions in Assume-Guarantee Contracts

Pre-deployment verification of software components with respect to behavioral specifications in the assume-guarantee form does not, in general, guarantee absence of errors at run time. This is because assumptions about the environment cannot be discharged until the environment is fixed. An intuitive approach is to complement pre-deployment verification of guarantees, up to the assumptions, with post-deployment monitoring of environment behavior to check that the assumptions are satisfied at run time. Such a monitor is typically implemented by instrumenting the application code of the component. An additional challenge for the monitoring step is that environment behaviors are typically obtained through an I/O library, which may alter the component's view of the input format. This transformation requires us to introduce a second pre-deployment verification step to ensure that alarms raised by the monitor would indeed correspond to violations of the environment assumptions. In this paper, we describe an approach for constructing monitors and verifying them against the component assumption. We also discuss limitations of instrumentation-based monitoring and potential ways to overcome it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Proceedings First Workshop on Causal Reasoning for Embedded and safety-critical Systems Technologies

Formal approaches for automated causality analysis, fault localization, explanation of events, accountability and blaming have been proposed independently by several communities --- in particular, AI, concurrency, model-based diagnosis, formal methods. Work on these topics has significantly gained speed during the last years. The goals of CREST are to bring together and foster exchange between researchers from the different communities, and to present and discuss recent advances and new ideas in the field. The workshop program consisted of a set of invited and contributed presentations that illustrate different techniques for, and applications of, causality analysis and fault localization. The program was anchored by two keynote talks. The keynote by Hana Chockler (King's College) provided a broad perspective on the application of causal reasoning based on Halpern and Pearl's definitions of actual causality to a variety of application domains ranging from formal verification to legal reasoning. The keynote by Chao Wang (Virginia Tech) concentrated on constraint-based analysis techniques for debugging and verifying concurrent programs. Workshop papers deal with compositional causality analysis and a wide spectrum of application for causal reasoning, such as debugging of probabilistic models, accountability and responsibility, hazard analysis in practice based on Lewis' counterfactuals, and fault localization and repair.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access