BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ivan Ruchkin

Ivan Ruchkin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceFormal Languages and Automata TheoryMachine LearningSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Finite-Sample Analysis of Elimination in Active Hypothesis Testing

A fixed-confidence, finite-sample problem of active hypothesis testing arises in many safety-critical applications. Situated in the context of sequential hypothesis testing, this paper studies the effect of hypothesis elimination on the stopping time. We introduce an elimination-augmented Track-and-Stop algorithm, in which champion-specific active-opponent sets are progressively pruned, and sensing effort is reallocated toward the surviving alternatives. Our analysis derives a non-asymptotic upper bound on the expected stopping time. The gain in finite-sample from elimination appears on the scale of the non-leading term, resulting from tighter tracking and concentration constants on the reduced hypothesis set. Furthermore, we introduce an aggressiveness parameter to modulate the trade-off between faster elimination and weaker confidence guarantee. An experimental study on synthetic Gaussian instances confirms the theoretical predictions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions

Closed-loop verification of cyber-physical systems with neural network controllers offers strong safety guarantees under certain assumptions. It is, however, difficult to determine whether these guarantees apply at run time because verification assumptions may be violated. To predict safety violations in a verified system, we propose a three-step confidence composition (CoCo) framework for monitoring verification assumptions. First, we represent the sufficient condition for verified safety with a propositional logical formula over assumptions. Second, we build calibrated confidence monitors that evaluate the probability that each assumption holds. Third, we obtain the confidence in the verification guarantees by composing the assumption monitors using a composition function suitable for the logical formula. Our CoCo framework provides theoretical bounds on the calibration and conservatism of compositional monitors. Two case studies show that compositional monitors are calibrated better than their constituents and successfully predict safety violations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Monotonic Safety for Scalable and Data-Efficient Probabilistic Safety Analysis

Autonomous systems with machine learning-based perception can exhibit unpredictable behaviors that are difficult to quantify, let alone verify. Such behaviors are convenient to capture in probabilistic models, but probabilistic model checking of such models is difficult to scale -- largely due to the non-determinism added to models as a prerequisite for provable conservatism. Statistical model checking (SMC) has been proposed to address the scalability issue. However it requires large amounts of data to account for the aforementioned non-determinism, which in turn limits its scalability. This work introduces a general technique for reduction of non-determinism based on assumptions of "monotonic safety'", which define a partial order between system states in terms of their probabilities of being safe. We exploit these assumptions to remove non-determinism from controller/plant models to drastically speed up probabilistic model checking and statistical model checking while providing provably conservative estimates as long as the safety is indeed monotonic. Our experiments demonstrate model-checking speed-ups of an order of magnitude while maintaining acceptable accuracy and require much less data for accurate estimates when running SMC -- even when monotonic safety does not perfectly hold and provable conservatism is not achieved.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access