BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nikolai F. Zobov

Nikolai F. Zobov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRphysics.chem-phastro-ph.EPphysics.atom-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Sub-percent accuracy for the intensity of a near infrared water line at 10670 cm$^{-1}$: experiment and analysis

Laser measurements of the intensity of (201) 3$_{22}$ -- (000) 2$_{21}$ near-infrared water absorption line at 10670.1 \cm\ are made using three different Herriott cells. These measurements determine the line intensity with an standard deviation below of 0.3~\% by consideration of the new geometrically derived formula for the opt ical path length without approximations. This determination together with the current accepted value leads to an overall uncertainty of 0.7~\% of the experimentally assessed line intensity which is compared with previous {\it ab initio} predictions. It is found that steady improvements in the both the dipole moment surface (DMS) and potential energy surface (PES) used in the theoretical studies leads to systematic better agreement with the observation, with the most recent prediction agreeing closely with the experiment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Calculated line lists for H$_{\text{2}} \mkern0.1mu ^{\text{16}}$O and H$_{\text{2}} \mkern0.1mu ^{\text{18}}$O with extensive comparisons to theoretical and experimental sources including the HITRAN2016 database

New line lists are presented for the two most abundant water isotopologues; H$_{2}$$^{16}$O and H$_{2}$$^{18}$O. The H$_{2}$$^{16}$O line list extends to 25710 cm$^{-1}$ with intensity stabilities provided via ratios of calculated intensities obtained from two different semi-empirical potential energy surfaces. The line list for H$_{2}$$^{18}$O extends to 20000 cm$^{-1}$. The minimum intensity considered for all is $10^{-30}$ cm molecule$^{-1}$ at 296~K, assuming 100\% abundance for each isotopologue. Fluctuation of calculated intensities caused by changes in the underlying potential energy are found to be significant, particularly for weak transitions. Direct comparisons are made against eighteen different sources of line intensities, both experimental and theoretical, many of which are used within the HITRAN2016 database. With some exceptions, there is excellent agreement between our line lists and the experimental intensities in HITRAN2016. In the infrared region, many H$_{2}$$^{16}$O bands which exhibit intensity differences of 5-10\% between to the most recent 'POKAZATEL' line list (Polyansky \textit{et al.}, [Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \textbf{480}, 2597 (2018)] and observation, are now generally predicted to within 1\%. For H$_{2}$$^{18}$O, there are systematic differences in the strongest intensities calculated in this work versus those obtained from semi-empirical calculations. In the visible, computed cross sections show smaller residuals between our work and both HITRAN2016 and HITEMP2010 than POKAZATEL. While our line list accurately reproduces HITEMP2010 cross sections in the observed region, residuals produced from this comparison do however highlight the need to update line positions in the visible spectrum of HITEMP2010. These line lists will be used to update many transition intensities and line positions in the HITRAN2016 database.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

QED correction for H$_3^+$

A quantum electrodynamics (QED) correction surface for the simplest polyatomic and polyelectronic system H$_3^+$ is computed using an approximate procedure. This surface is used to calculate the shifts to vibration-rotation energy levels due to QED; such shifts have a magnitude of up to 0.25 cm$^{-1}$ for vibrational levels up to 15~000 cm$^{-1}$ and are expected to have an accuracy of about 0.02 cm$^{-1}$. Combining the new H$_3^+$ QED correction surface with existing highly accurate Born-Oppenheimer (BO), relativistic and adiabatic components suggests that deviations of the resulting {\it ab initio} energy levels from observed ones are largely due to non-adiabatic effects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access