BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Nicolas Rivera

Nicolas Rivera appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Machine LearningMethodologyDiscrete MathematicsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingmath.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space log-rank test for the two-sample problem

Weighted log-rank tests are arguably the most widely used tests by practitioners for the two-sample problem in the context of right-censored data. Many approaches have been considered to make weighted log-rank tests more robust against a broader family of alternatives, among them, considering linear combinations of weighted log-rank tests, and taking the maximum among a finite collection of them. In this paper, we propose as test statistic the supremum of a collection of (potentially infinite) weight-indexed log-rank tests where the index space is the unit ball in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). By using some desirable properties of RKHSs we provide an exact and simple evaluation of the test statistic and establish connections with previous tests in the literature. Additionally, we show that for a special family of RKHSs, the proposed test is omnibus. We finalise by performing an empirical evaluation of the proposed methodology and show an application to a real data scenario. Our theoretical results are proved using techniques for double integrals with respect to martingales that may be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Kernelized Stein Discrepancy Tests of Goodness-of-fit for Time-to-Event Data

Survival Analysis and Reliability Theory are concerned with the analysis of time-to-event data, in which observations correspond to waiting times until an event of interest such as death from a particular disease or failure of a component in a mechanical system. This type of data is unique due to the presence of censoring, a type of missing data that occurs when we do not observe the actual time of the event of interest but, instead, we have access to an approximation for it given by random interval in which the observation is known to belong. Most traditional methods are not designed to deal with censoring, and thus we need to adapt them to censored time-to-event data. In this paper, we focus on non-parametric goodness-of-fit testing procedures based on combining the Stein's method and kernelized discrepancies. While for uncensored data, there is a natural way of implementing a kernelized Stein discrepancy test, for censored data there are several options, each of them with different advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we propose a collection of kernelized Stein discrepancy tests for time-to-event data, and we study each of them theoretically and empirically; our experimental results show that our proposed methods perform better than existing tests, including previous tests based on a kernelized maximum mean discrepancy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Discordant voting processes on finite graphs

We consider an asynchronous voting process on graphs which we call discordant voting, and which can be described as follows. Initially each vertex holds one of two opinions, red or blue say. Neighbouring vertices with different opinions interact pairwise. After an interaction both vertices have the same colour. The quantity of interest is T, the time to reach consensus , i.e. the number of interactions needed for all vertices have the same colour. An edge whose endpoint colours differ (i.e. one vertex is coloured red and the other one blue) is said to be discordant. A vertex is discordant if its is incident with a discordant edge. In discordant voting, all interactions are based on discordant edges. Because the voting process is asynchronous there are several ways to update the colours of the interacting vertices. Push: Pick a random discordant vertex and push its colour to a random discordant neighbour. Pull: Pick a random discordant vertex and pull the colour of a random discordant neighbour. Oblivious: Pick a random endpoint of a random discordant edge and push the colour to the other end point. We show that E(T), the expected time to reach consensus, depends strongly on the underlying graph and the update rule. For connected graphs on n vertices, and an initial half red, half blue colouring the following hold. For oblivious voting, E(T) =n^2/4 independent of the underlying graph. For the complete graph K_n, the push protocol has E(T)= Theta(n log(n)), whereas the pull protocol has E(T)= Theta(2^n). For the cycle C_n all three protocols have E(T) = Theta(n^2). For the star graph however, the pull protocol has E(T)=O(n^2), whereas the push protocol is slower with E(T) = Theta(n^2 log(n)). The wide variation in E(T) for the pull protocol is to be contrasted with the well known model of synchronous pull voting, for which E(T) = O(n) on many classes of expanders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The coalescing-branching random walk on expanders and the dual epidemic process

Information propagation on graphs is a fundamental topic in distributed computing. One of the simplest models of information propagation is the push protocol in which at each round each agent independently pushes the current knowledge to a random neighbour. In this paper we study the so-called coalescing-branching random walk (COBRA), in which each vertex pushes the information to $k$ randomly selected neighbours and then stops passing information until it receives the information again. The aim of COBRA is to propagate information fast but with a limited number of transmissions per vertex per step. In this paper we study the cover time of the COBRA process defined as the minimum time until each vertex has received the information at least once. Our main result says that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex $r$-regular graph whose transition matrix has second eigenvalue $λ$, then the COBRA cover time of $G$ is $\mathcal O(\log n )$, if $1-λ$ is greater than a positive constant, and $\mathcal O((\log n)/(1-λ)^3))$, if $1-λ\gg \sqrt{\log( n)/n}$. These bounds are independent of $r$ and hold for $3 \le r \le n-1$. They improve the previous bound of $O(\log^2 n)$ for expander graphs. Our main tool in analysing the COBRA process is a novel duality relation between this process and a discrete epidemic process, which we call a biased infection with persistent source (BIPS). A fixed vertex $v$ is the source of an infection and remains permanently infected. At each step each vertex $u$ other than $v$ selects $k$ neighbours, independently and uniformly, and $u$ is infected in this step if and only if at least one of the selected neighbours has been infected in the previous step. We show the duality between COBRA and BIPS which says that the time to infect the whole graph in the BIPS process is of the same order as the cover time of the COBRA process

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access