Researcher profile

Mordehai Milgrom

Mordehai Milgrom contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
45works
0followers
12topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

45 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Numerical Solutions of the External Field Effect on the Radial Acceleration in Disk Galaxies

In MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics)-based theories the strong equivalence principle is generically broken in an idiosyncratic manner, manifested in the action of an "external field effect (EFE)". The internal dynamics in a self-gravitating system is affected even by a constant external field. In disk galaxies the EFE can induce warps and modify the rotational speeds. Due to the non-linearity of MOND, it is difficult to derive analytic expressions of this important effect in a disk. Here we study numerically the EFE in two non-relativistic Lagrangian theories of MOND: the `Aquadratic-Lagrangian' theory (AQUAL) and `Quasilinear MOND' (QUMOND). For AQUAL we consider only the axisymmetric field configurations with the external field along the disk axis, or a spherical galaxy with test-particle orbits inclined to the external field. For the more manageable QUMOND we calculate also the three-dimensional field configurations, with the external field inclined to the disk axis. We investigate particularly to what degree an external field modifies the quasi-flat part of rotation curves. While our QUMOND results agree well with published numerical results in QUMOND, we find that AQUAL predicts weaker EFE than published AQUAL results. However, AQUAL still predicts stronger EFE than QUMOND, which demonstrates current theoretical uncertainties. We also illustrate how the MOND prediction on the rising part of the rotation curve, in the inner parts, depends largely on disk thickness but only weakly on a plausible external field for a fixed galaxy model. Finally, we summarize our results for the outer parts as an improved, approximate analytic expression.

preprint2021arXiv

Deep-MOND polytropes

Working within the deep-MOND limit (DML), I describe spherical, self-gravitating systems governed by a polytropic equation of state, $P=\mathcal{K}ρ^γ$. As self-consistent structures, such systems can serve as heuristic models for DML, astronomical systems, such as dwarf spheroidal galaxies, low-surface-density elliptical galaxies and star clusters, and diffuse galaxy groups. They can also serve as testing ground for various theoretical MOND inferences. In dimensionless form, the equation satisfied by the radial density profile $ζ(y)$ is (for $γ\not=1$) $[\int_0^y ζ\bar y^2 d\bar y]^{1/2}=-yd(ζ^{γ-1})/dy$. Or, $θ^n(y)=y^{-2}[(yθ&#39;)^2]&#39;$, where $θ=ζ^{γ-1}$, and $n\equiv (γ-1)^{-1}$. I discuss properties of the solutions, contrasting them with those of their Newtonian analogues -- the Lane-Emden polytropes. Due to the stronger MOND gravity, all DML polytropes have a finite mass, and for $n<\infty$ ($γ>1$) all have a finite radius. (Lane-Emden spheres have a finite mass only for $n\le 5$.) I use the DML polytropes to study DML scaling relations. For example, they satisfy a universal relation (for all $\mathcal{K}$ and $γ$) between the total mass, $M$, and the mass-average velocity dispersion $σ$: $MGa_0=(9/4)σ^4$. However, the relation between $M$ and other measures of the velocity dispersion, such as the central, projected one, $\barσ$, does depend on $n$ (but not $\mathcal{K}$), defining a `fundamental surface&#39; in the $[M,~\barσ,~n]$ space. I also describe the generalization to anisotropic polytropes, which also all have a finite radius (for $γ>1$), and all satisfy the above universal $M-σ$ relation. This more extended class of models exhibits the central-surface-densities relation: a tight relation between the baryonic and the dynamical central surface densities predicted by MOND.

preprint2020arXiv

Fast-rotating galaxies do not depart from the MOND mass-asymptotic-speed relation

Ogle et al. have fallaciously argued recently that fast-rotating disc galaxies break with the predictions of MOND: the 6 fastest rotators of the 23 galaxies in their sample appear to have higher rotational speeds than is consistent with the MOND relation between the baryonic mass of a galaxy, $M$, and its `rotational speed&#39;, $V$. They interpret this departure as a break in the observed $M-V$ relation from a logarithmic slope near the MOND-predicted $4$, to a shallow slope of $\approx 0$. However, Ogle et al. use the MAXIMAL rotational speed of the galaxies, $V_{max}$, not the ASYMPTOTIC one, $V_\infty$, which appears in the MOND prediction, $V_\infty^4=MGa_0$. Plotting their $M$ vs. $V_{max}$ pairs on an $M$ vs. $V_\infty$ plot from Lelli et al. (2016), they arrive erroneously at the above tension with MOND. The $H_α$ rotation curves used by Ogle et al. are far too short reaching to probe the asymptotic regime, and determine $V_\infty$. However, it is well documented for fast rotators with observed, extended, HI rotation curves, that they can have $V_{max}$ considerably larger than the MOND-relevant $V_\infty$ [Noordermeer and Verheijen (NV) (2007) and others]. E.g., the fastest rotator in the NV sample has $V_{max}\approx 490{\rm ~km/s}$, but $V_\infty\approx 250{\rm ~km/s}$. NV also show that in a (MOND-irrelevant) $M-V_{max}$ plot the high-speed galaxies fall off the power-law line defined by the lower-speed ones, creating a break in the $M$ vs. $V$ relation, in just the way claimed by Ogle et al. But, when plotting the MOND-relevant $M$ vs. $V_\infty$ all galaxies fall near the same power-law relation, without a break.

preprint2020arXiv

MOND vs. dark matter in light of historical parallels

MOND is a paradigm that contends to account for the mass discrepancies in the Universe without invoking `dark&#39; components, such as `dark matter&#39; and `dark energy&#39;. It does so by supplanting Newtonian dynamics and General Relativity, departing from them at very low accelerations. Having in mind readers who are historians and philosophers of science, as well as physicists and astronomers, I describe in this review the main aspects of MOND -- its statement, its basic tenets, its main predictions, and the tests of these predictions -- contrasting it with the dark-matter paradigm. I then discuss possible wider ramifications of MOND, for example the potential significance of the MOND constant, $a_0$, with possible implications for the roots of MOND in cosmology. Along the way I point to parallels with several historical instances of nascent paradigms. In particular, with the emergence of the Copernican world picture, that of quantum physics, and that of relativity, as regards their initial advent, their development, their schematic structure, and their ramifications. For example, the interplay between theories and their corollary laws, and the centrality of a new constant with converging values as deduced from seemingly unrelated manifestations of these laws. I demonstrate how MOND has already unearthed a number of unsuspected laws of galactic dynamics (to which, indeed, $a_0$ is central) predicting them a priori, and leading to their subsequent verification. I parallel the struggle of the new with the old paradigms, and the appearance of hybrid paradigms at such times of struggle. I also try to identify in the history of those established paradigms a stage that can be likened to that of MOND today.

preprint2020arXiv

The $a_0$ -- cosmology connection in MOND

I limelight and review a potentially crucial aspect of MOND: The near equality of the MOND acceleration constant, $a_0$ -- as deduced from local, galactic phenomena -- and cosmological parameters. To wit, $a_0\sim c H_0\sim c^2Λ^{1/2}\sim c^2/\ell_U$, where $H_0$ is the present value of the Hubble-Lemaître constant, $Λ$ is the `cosmological constant&#39;, and $\ell_U$ is a cosmological characteristic length; e.g., the Hubble distance, or the de Sitter radius associated with $Λ$. In itself, this near equality has some important phenomenological consequences, such as the impossibility of black holes, and of cosmological strong lensing, in the MOND regime. More importantly perhaps, this `coincidence&#39; may be a pointer to the `FUNDAMOND&#39; -- the more basic theory underlying MOND phenomenology. The manners in which such a relation emerges in existing, underlying scheme of MOND are also reviewed, interlaced with examples of similar relations in other physical systems, between apparently-fundamental velocity, length, and acceleration constants. Such analogies may point the way to explanation of the MOND `coincidence&#39;.

preprint2016arXiv

Critical take on &#34;Mass models of disk galaxies from the DiskMass Survey in MOND&#34;

Angus et al. (2015) have recently faulted MOND as follows: Studying thirty disc galaxies from the DiskMass survey, they derive the profiles of velocity dispersion perpendicular to the discs as predicted by MOND, $σ_M(r)$, and compare them with $σ(r)$, measured as part of the DiskMass project. This is a new test of MOND, different from rotation-curve analysis. A nontrivial accomplishment of MOND -- not discussed by Angus et al. -- is that the shapes of $σ_M$ and $σ$ agree very well, i.e, $η(r)\equivσ_M(r)/σ(r)$ is well consistent with being $r$-independent (while $σ$ and $σ_M$ are strongly $r$ dependent). The fault found with MOND was that $η$ is systematically above 1 (with an average of about 1.3). I have suggested to Angus et al. that the fault may lie with the DiskMass dispersions, which may well be too low for the purpose at hand: Being based on population-integrated line profiles, they may be overweighed by younger populations, known to have much smaller dispersions, and scale heights, than the older populations, which weigh more heavily on the light distributions. I discuss independent evidence that supports this view, and show, besides, that if the DiskMas dispersions are underestimates by only 25 %, on average, the MOND predictions are in full agreement with the data, in shape and magnitude. Now, Aniyan et al. (2015) have questioned the DiskMass $σ$ on the same basis. They show for the solar column in the Milky Way that: &#34; Combining the (single) measured velocity dispersion of the total young + old disc population... with the scale height estimated for the older population would underestimate the disc surface density by a factor of $\sim 2.$&#34; If this mismatch found for the Milky Way is typical, correcting for it would bring the measured DiskMass $σ(r)$ to a remarkable agreement with the predicted MOND $σ_M(r)$.

preprint2016arXiv

MOND impact on and of the recently updated mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation

McGaugh et al. (2016) have used their extensive SPARC sample to update the well-known mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation (MDAR), which is one of the major predicted &#34;MOND laws&#34;. This is not a newly discovered relation. Rather, it improves on the many previous studies of it, with more and better data. Like its precedents, it bears crucial ramifications for the observed dynamical anomalies in disc galaxies, and, in particular, on their resolution by the MOND paradigm. Their result, indeed, constitute a triumph for MOND. However, unlike previous analyses of the MDAR, McGaugh et al. have chosen to obfuscate the MOND roots of their analysis, and its connection with, and implications for, this paradigm. For example, the fitting formula they use, seemingly as a result of some unexplained inspiration, follows in its salient properties from the basic tenets of MOND, and has already been used in the past in several MOND analyses. No other possible origin for such a function is known. Given that this formula had already been shown to reproduce correctly the observed rotation curves from the baryon distribution (as a MOND effect), it must have been clear, a priory, that it should describe correctly the MDAR, which is but a summary of rotation curves. The present paper corrects these oversights -- bringing to light the deep connections with MOND, suppressed by McGaugh et al. It also gives due credit to previous works, and discusses some new, important, but less known, aspects of this MOND relation. (Substantially abridged.)

preprint2016arXiv

The $Λ$CDM simulations of Keller and Wadsley do not account for the MOND mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation

Keller and Wadsley (2016) have smugly suggested, recently, that the end of MOND may be in view. This is based on their claim that their highly-restricted sample of $Λ$CDM-simulated galaxies are &#34;consistent&#34; with the observed MOND mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation (MDAR), in particular, with its recent update by McGaugh et al. (2016), based on the SPARC sample. From this they extrapolate to &#34;$Λ$CDM is fully consistent&#34; with the MDAR. I explain why these simulated galaxies do not show that $Λ$CDM accounts for the MDAR. a. Their sample of simulated galaxies contains only 18 high-mass galaxies, within a narrow range of one order of magnitude in baryonic mass, at the very high end of the observed, SPARC sample, which spans 4.5 orders of magnitude in mass. More importantly, the simulated sample has none of the low-mass, low-acceleration galaxies -- abundant in SPARC -- which encapsulate the crux and the nontrivial aspects of the predicted and observed MDAR. The low-acceleration part of the simulated MDAR is achieved, rather trivially, from the flattish-velocity-curve regions of the simulated high-mass galaxies. b. Half of the simulated galaxies have &#34;wrong&#34; rotation curves that differ greatly from any observed ones. This, does not prevent these wrong galaxies from lying on the observed MDAR (for trivial reasons, again). They, in fact, define the high-acceleration branch of the simulated MDAR. c. To boot, even if $Λ$CDM were made &#34;consistent&#34; with the MDAR through the elaborate adjustments that the simulations allow, this would not obviate MOND, which predicts much more than the MDAR.

preprint2016arXiv

The response of linear inhomogeneous systems to coupled fields: Bounds and perturbation expansions

We consider the response of a multicomponent body to $n$ fields, such as electric fields, magnetic fields, temperature gradients, concentration gradients, etc., where each component, which is possibly anisotropic, may cross couple the various fields with different fluxes, such as electrical currents, electrical displacement currents, magnetic induction fields, energy fluxes, particle fluxes, etc. We obtain the form of the perturbation expansions of the fields and response tensor in powers of matrices which measure the difference between each component tensor and a homogeneous reference tensor ${\bf L}_0$. For the case of a statistically homogeneous or periodic composite the expansion coefficients can be expressed in terms of positive semidefinite normalization matrices alternating with positive semidefinite weight matrices, which at each given level sum to the identity matrix. In an appropriate basis the projection operators onto the relevant subspaces can be expressed in block tridiagonal form, where the blocks are functions of these weight and normalization matrices. This leads to continued fraction expansions for the effective tensor, and by truncating the continued fraction at successive levels one obtains a nested sequence of bounds on the effective tensor incorporating successively more weight and normalization matrices. The weight matrices and normalization matrices can be calculated from the series expansions of the fields which solve the conductivity problem alone, without any couplings to other fields, and then they can be used to obtain the solution for the fields and effective tensor in coupled field problems in composites.

preprint2016arXiv

Universal MOND relation between the baryonic and `dynamical&#39; central surface densities of disc galaxies

I derive a new MOND relation for pure-disc galaxies: The `dynamical&#39; central surface density, $Σ^0_D$, deduced from the measured velocities, is a universal function of only the true, `baryonic&#39; central surface density, $Σ^0_B$: $Σ^0_D=Σ_M \mathcal{S}(Σ^0_B/Σ_M)$, where $Σ_M\equiv a_0/2πG$ is the MOND surface density constant. This surprising result is shown to hold in both existing, nonrelativistic MOND theories. $\mathcal{S}(y)$ is derived: $\mathcal{S}(y)=\int_0^yν(y&#39;)dy&#39;$, with $ν(y)$ the interpolating function of the theory. The relation aymptotes to $Σ^0_D=Σ^0_B$ for $Σ^0_B\ggΣ_M$, and to $Σ^0_D=(4Σ_MΣ^0_B)^{1/2}$ for $Σ^0_B\llΣ_M$. This study was prompted by the recent finding of a correlation between related attributes of disc galaxies by Lelli et al. (2016). The MOND central-surface-densities relation agrees very well with these results.

preprint2015arXiv

The road to MOND--a novel perspective

Accepting that galactic mass discrepancies are due to modified dynamics, I show why it is specifically the MOND paradigm that is pointed to cogently. MOND is thus discussed here as a special case of a larger class of modified dynamics theories whereby galactic systems with large mass discrepancies are described by scale-invariant dynamics. This is a novel presentation that uses more recent, after-the-fact insights and data (largely predicted beforehand by MOND). Starting from a purist set of tenets, I follow the path that leads specifically to the MOND basic tenets. The main signposts are: (i) Space-time scale invariance underlies the dynamics of systems with large mass discrepancies. (ii) In these dynamics, $G$ must be replaced by a single &#34;scale-invariant&#34; gravitational constant, Q0 (in MOND, Q0=A0=Ga0, where a0 is MOND&#39;s acceleration constant). (iii) Universality of free fall points to the constant q0=Q0/G as the boundary between the G-controlled, standard dynamics, and the Q0-controlled, scale-invariant dynamics (in MOND, q0=a0). (iv) Data clinches the case for q0 being an acceleration (MOND).

preprint2015arXiv

Ultra-diffuse cluster galaxies as key to the MOND cluster conundrum

MOND reduces greatly the mass discrepancy in clusters of galaxies, but does leave a consistent global discrepancy of about a factor of two. It has been proposed, within the minimalist and purist MOND, that clusters harbor some indigenous, yet-undetected, cluster baryonic (dark) matter (CBDM). Its total amount has to be comparable with that of the observed hot gas. Following an initial discovery by van Dokkum & al. (2015a), Koda & al. (2015) have recently identified more than a thousand ultra-diffuse galaxy-like objects (UDGs) in the Coma cluster. Robustness of the UDGs to tidal disruption seems to require, within Newtonian dynamics, that they are much more massive than their observed stellar component. Here, I propound that a considerable fraction of the CBDM is internal to UDGs, which endows them with robustness. The rest of the CBDM objects formed in now-disrupted kin of the UDGs, and is dispersed in the intracluster medium. While the discovery of cluster UDGs is not in itself a resolution of the MOND cluster conundrum, it lends greater qualitative plausibility to CBDM as its resolution, for reasons I discuss. Alternatively, if the UDGs are only now falling into Coma, their large size and very low surface brightness could result from the adiabatic inflation due to the MOND external-field effect, as described in Brada & Milgrom (2000). I also consider briefly solutions to the conundrum that invoke more elaborate extensions of purist MOND, e.g., that in clusters, the MOND constant takes up larger-than-canonical values of the MOND constant.

preprint2014arXiv

General virial theorem for modified-gravity MOND

An important and useful relation is known to hold in two specific MOND theories. It pertains to low-acceleration, isolated systems of pointlike masses, m_p, at positions r_p, subject to gravitational forces F_p. It reads sum_p r_p.F_p=-(2/3)(Ga0)^{1/2}[(\sum_p m_p)^{3/2}-\sum_p m_p^{3/2}]; a0 is the MOND acceleration constant. Here I show that this relation holds in the nonrelativistic limit of any modified-gravity MOND theory. It follows from only the basic tenets of MOND (as applied to such theories): departure from standard dynamics at accelerations below a0, and space-time scale invariance in the nonrelativistic, low-acceleration limit. This implies space-dilatation invariance of the static, gravitational-field equations, which, in turn, leads to the above point-mass virial relation. Thus, the various MOND predictions and tests based on this relation hold in any modified-gravity MOND theory. Since we do not know that any of the existing MOND theories point in the right direction, it is important to identify such predictions that hold in a much larger class of theories. Among these predictions are the MOND two-body force for arbitrary masses, and a general mass-velocity-dispersion relation of the form sigma^2=(2/3)(MGa0)^{1/2}[1-\sum_p (m_p/M)^{3/2}], where M is the total mass.

preprint2014arXiv

Gravitational waves in bimetric MOND

I consider the weak field limit (WFL) of bimetric MOND (BIMOND): the lowest order in the small departures Hmn and H&#39;mn from double Minkowski space-time. In particular, I look at propagating solutions, for a favorite subclass of BIMOND. The WFL splits into two sectors for two linear combinations, Hmn+ and Hmn-, of Hmn and H&#39;mn. The Hmn+ sector is equivalent to the WFL of general relativity (GR), with its gauge freedom, and has the same vacuum gravitational waves. The Hmn- sector is fully nonlinear even for the weakest Hmn-, and inherits none of the coordinate gauge freedom. The equations of motion are scale invariant in the deep-MOND limit of purely gravitational systems. In these last two regards, the BIMOND WFL is greatly different from that of other bimetric theories studied to date. Despite the strong nonlinearity, an arbitrary pair of harmonic GR wave packets of Hmn and H&#39;mn moving in the same direction, is a solution of the (vacuum) BIMOND WFL.

preprint2014arXiv

MOND theory

A general account of MOND theory is given. I start with the basic tenets of MOND, which posit departure from standard dynamics in the limit of low acceleration -- below an acceleration constant a0 -- where dynamics become scale invariant. I list some of the salient predictions of these tenets. The special role of a0 and its significance are then discussed. In particular, I stress its coincidence with cosmologically relevant accelerations. The deep-MOND limit and the consequences of its scale invariance are considered in some detail. General aspects of MOND theories are then described, after which I list briefly presently known theories, both nonrelativistic and relativistic. Most full-fledged theories modify the gravitational action, hinge on a0, introduce an interpolating function between the low and high accelerations, and obey MOND requirements in the opposite limits. These theories have much heuristic value as proofs of various concepts (e.g., that covariant MOND theories can be written with correct gravitational lensing). But, probably, they are, at best, effective theories of limited applicability. I then outline several other promising approaches to constructing MOND theories that strive to obtain MOND as an effective theory from deeper concepts, for example, by modifying inertia and/or gravity as a result of interactions with some omnipresent agent. Some theories do enjoy a natural appearance of a cosmological-constant-like contribution that, furthermore, exhibits the observed connection with a0. However, none were shown to address fully the mass discrepancies in cosmology and structure formation that are otherwise explained by cosmological dark matter. We have no clues as to whether and how MOND aspects enter non-gravitational phenomena, but I discuss briefly some possibilities.

preprint2013arXiv

Andromeda Dwarfs in Light of MOND

We compare the recently published velocity dispersions for seventeen Andromeda dwarf spheroidals with estimates of the MOND predictions, based on the luminosities of these dwarfs, with reasonable stellar M/L values, and no dark matter. We find that the two are consistent within the uncertainties. We further predict the velocity dispersions of another ten dwarfs for which only photometric data are currently available.

preprint2013arXiv

MOND and its bimetric formulation

I first give a succinct account of the MOND paradigm--emphasizing the centrality of scale invariance in the nonrelativistic, deep-MOND limit--and describing rudiments of its phenomenology. I then present my credo, and some generalities, concerning existing MOND theories. Then I concentrate on one relativistic formulation of MOND in the form of a bimetric theory (BIMOND). I describe its various limits: the weak field, with application to gravitational waves, the nonrelativistic limit, and their further deep-MOND (low acceleration) limits, which are scale invariant. Other aspects of BIMOND that have been explored are aspects of cosmology, matter fluctuations in cosmology, and matter-twin-matter interactions. BIMOND remains largely unexplored, despite its promise in several regards: It tends to GR for a0 goes to 0 (a0 is the MOND constant); it has a simple nonrelativistic limit; it describes gravitational lensing correctly; and, it has a generic appearance of a cosmological-constant term that is of order a0^2/c^4, as observed.

preprint2013arXiv

MOND laws of galactic dynamics

MOND predicts a number of laws that galactic systems should obey irrespective of their complicated, haphazard, and mostly unknowable histories -- as Kepler&#39;s laws are obeyed by planetary systems. The main purpose of this work is to show how, and to what extent, these MOND laws follow from only the paradigm&#39;s basic tenets: departure from standard dynamics at accelerations a<~a0, and space-time scale invariance in the limit a<<a0. Such predictions will be shared by all MOND theories that embody these premises. This is important because we do not know which of the existing MOND theories, if any, is a step in the right direction. In the Newtonian-dynamics-plus-dark-matter paradigm, the validity of such clear-cut laws -- which tightly constrain baryons, `dark matter&#39;, and their mutual relations -- is contrary to expectations.

preprint2013arXiv

Testing the MOND Paradigm of Modified Dynamics with Galaxy-Galaxy Gravitational Lensing

MOND predicts that the asymptotic gravitational potential of an isolated, bounded (baryonic) mass, M, is phi(r)=(MGa0)^{1/2}ln(r); a0 is the MOND constant. Relativistic MOND theories predict that the lensing effects of M are dictated by phi(r) as general-relativity lensing is dictated by the Newtonian potential. Thus, MOND predicts that the asymptotic Newtonian potential deduced from galaxy-galaxy gravitational lensing will have: (1) a logarithmic r dependence, and (2) a normalization (parametrized standardly as 2s^2) that depends only on M: s=(MGa0/4)^{1/4}. I compare these predictions with recent results of galaxy-galaxy lensing, and find agreement on all counts. For the &#34;blue&#34;-lenses subsample (&#34;spiral&#34; galaxies) MOND reproduces the observations well with an r&#39;-band M/L of 1-3 solar units, and for &#34;red&#34; lenses (&#34;elliptical&#34; galaxies) with M/L of 3-6 solar units, both consistent with baryons only. In contradistinction, Newtonian analysis requires, typically, M/L values of about 130 solar units, bespeaking a mass discrepancy of a factor of about 40. Compared with the staple, rotation-curve tests, MOND is here tested in a wider population of galaxies, through a different phenomenon, using relativistic test objects, and is probed to several-times-lower accelerations--as low as a few percent of a0.

preprint2013arXiv

The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm

Cosmological models that invoke warm or cold dark matter can not explain observed regularities in the properties of dwarf galaxies, their highly anisotropic spatial distributions, nor the correlation between observed mass discrepancies and acceleration. These problems with the standard model of cosmology have deep implications, in particular in combination with the observation that the data are excellently described by Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). MOND is a classical dynamics theory which explains the mass discrepancies in galactic systems, and in the universe at large, without invoking dark entities. MOND introduces a new universal constant of nature with the dimensions of acceleration, a0, such that the pre-MONDian dynamics is valid for accelerations a >> a0, and the deep MONDian regime is obtained for a << a0, where space-time scale invariance is invoked. Remaining challenges for MOND are (i) explaining fully the observed mass discrepancies in galaxy clusters, and (ii) the development of a relativistic theory of MOND that will satisfactorily account for cosmology. The universal constant a0 turns out to have an intriguing connection with cosmology: \bar a0 == 2 pi a0 \approx c H_0 \approx c^2(Lambda/3)^{1/2}. This may point to a deep connection between cosmology and internal dynamics of local systems.

preprint2012arXiv

A novel MOND effect in isolated high-acceleration systems

I discuss a novel MOND effect that entails a correction to the dynamics of isolated mass systems even when they are deep in the Newtonian regime: systems whose extent R<<Rm, where Rm=sqrt(GM/a0) is the MOND radius, and M the total mass. Interestingly, even if the MOND equations approach Newtonian dynamics arbitrarily fast at high accelerations, this correction decreases only as a power of R/Rm. The effect appears in formulations of MOND as modified gravity, governed by generalizations of the Poisson equation. The MOND correction to the potential is a quadrupole field G*Pij*Ri*Rj, where R is the radius from the center of mass. In QUMOND (quasilinear MOND), Pij=-qQij/Rm^5, where Qij is the quadrupole moment of the system, and q>0 is a numerical factor that depends on the interpolating function. For example, the correction to the Newtonian force between two masses, m and M, a distance L apart (L<<Rm), is Fa=2q(L/Rm)^3(mM)^2(M+m)^{-3}a0 (attractive). For generic MOND theories, which approach Newtonian dynamics quickly for accelerations beyond a0, the predicted strength of the effect in the Solar system is rather much below present testing capabilities. In MOND theories that become Newtonian only beyond k*a0, the effect is enhanced by k^2.

preprint2012arXiv

Global Deep-MOND Parameter as a Theory Discriminant

Different formulations of MOND predict somewhat different rotation curves for the same mass distribution. Here I consider a global attribute of the rotation curve that might provide a convenient discriminant between theories when applied to isolated, pure-disk galaxies that are everywhere deep in the MOND regime. This parameter is Q=<V^2>/V0^2, where <V^2> is the mean squared rotational speed of the galaxy, and V0 is the asymptotic (constant) rotational speed. The comparison between the observed and predicted values of Q is oblivious to the distance, the inclination, the mass, and the size of the disk, and to the form of the interpolating function. For the known modified-gravity theories Q is predicted to be a universal constant (independent of the mass distribution in the disk): Q=2/3. The predicted Q value for modified-inertia theories does depend on the mass distribution. However, surprisingly, I find here that it varies only little among a very wide range of mass distributions, Q=0.73+-0.01. While the difference between the theories amounts to only about 5 percent in the predicted RMS velocity, a good enough sample of galaxies may provide the first discerning test between the two classes of theories.

preprint2012arXiv

Practically linear analogs of the Born-Infeld and other nonlinear theories

I discuss theories that describe fully nonlinear physics, while being practically linear (PL), in that they require solving only linear differential equations. These theories may be interesting in themselves as manageable nonlinear theories. But, they can also be chosen to emulate genuinely nonlinear theories of special interest, for which they can serve as approximations. The idea can be applied to a large class of nonlinear theories, exemplified here with a PL analogs of scalar theories, and of Born-Infeld (BI) electrodynamics. The general class of such PL theories of electromagnetism are governed by a Lagrangian L=-(1/2)F_mnQ^mn+ S(Q_mn), where the electromagnetic field couples to currents in the standard way, while Qmn is an auxiliary field, derived from a vector potential that does not couple directly to currents. By picking a special form of S(Q_mn), we can make such a theory similar in some regards to a given fully nonlinear theory, governed by the Lagrangian -U(F_mn). A particularly felicitous choice is to take S as the Legendre transform of U. For the BI theory, this Legendre transform has the same form as the BI Lagrangian itself. Various matter-of-principle questions remain to be answered regarding such theories. As a specific example, I discuss BI electrostatics in more detail. As an aside, for BI, I derive an exact expression for the short-distance force between two arbitrary point charges of the same sign, in any dimension.

preprint2012arXiv

Testing MOND Over a Wide Acceleration Range in X-Ray Ellipticals

The gravitational fields of two isolated ellipticals, NGC 720 and NGC 1521, have been recently measured to very large galactic radii (~100 and ~200 kpc), assuming hydrostatic balance of the hot gas enshrouding them. They afford, for the first time to my knowledge, testing MOND in ellipticals with force and quality that, arguably, approach those of rotation-curve tests in disk galaxies. In the context of MOND, it is noteworthy that the measured accelerations span a wide range, from more than 10a0 to about a0/10, unprecedented in individual ellipticals. I find that MOND predicts correctly the measured dynamical mass runs (apart from a possible minor tension in the inner few kpc of NGC 720, which might be due to departure from hydrostatic equilibrium): The predicted mass discrepancy increases outward from none, near the center, to ~10 at the outermost radii. The implications for the MOND-vs-dark-matter controversy go far beyond the simple fact of two more galaxies conforming to MOND.

preprint2011arXiv

Gravitational Cherenkov losses in MOND theories

Survival of high-energy cosmic rays (HECRs) against gravitational Cherenkov losses is shown not to cast strong constraints on MOND theories that are compatible with general relativity (GR): theories that coincide with GR in the high-acceleration limit. The energy-loss rate, L, is shown to be many orders smaller than those derived in the literature for theories with no extra scale. The gravitational acceleration produced by a HECR in its vicinity is much higher than the MOND acceleration a0. So, modification to GR, which underlies L, enters only beyond the MOND radius of the particle, within which GR holds sway: r_M=sqrt(Gp/c a0). The spectral cutoff, which enters L quadratically, is thus 1/r_M, not the particle&#39;s, much larger, de Broglie wavenumber: k_{dB}= p/hbar. Thus, L is smaller than published rates, which use k_{dB}, by a factor (r_M k_{dB})^2~10^{39}(cp/3.10^{11}Gev)^3. With 1/r_M as cutoff, the distance a HECR can travel without major losses is q l_M, where l_M=c^2/a0 is the MOND length, and q is a dimensionless function of parameters of the problem. Since l_M is ~2 pi times the Hubble distance, survival of HECRs does not strongly constrain GR-compatible, MOND theories. Such theories also easily satisfy existing preferred-frame limits, inasmuch as these limits are gotten in high-acceleration systems. I exemplify the results with MOND adaptations of Einstein-Aether theories.

preprint2011arXiv

MD or DM? Modified dynamics at low accelerations vs dark matter

The MOND paradigm posits a departure from standard Newtonian dynamics, and from General Relativity, in the limit of small accelerations. The resulting modified dynamics aim to account for the mass discrepancies in the universe without non-baryonic dark matter. I briefly review this paradigm with its basic tenets, and its underlying theories--nonrelativistic and relativistic--including a novel, bimetric MOND gravity theory. I also comment on MOND&#39;s possible connection to, and origin in, the cosmological state of the universe at large. Some of its main predictions, achievements, and remaining desiderata are listed. I then succinctly pit MOND against the competing paradigm of standard dynamics with cold, dark matter. (Abridged)

preprint2011arXiv

MOND and the unique void galaxy KK246

MOND predictions are compared with the mass discrepancy, Gamma (the dynamical-to-baryon mass ratio) deduced from the recently measured rotation curve, for the gas-rich, dwarf galaxy KK246, &#34;the only galaxy observed in the local void&#34;. KK246 is special in at least two regards: a. It is, to my knowledge, the record holder for the largest mass discrepancy deduced from a rotation curve, Gamma= 15. b. It is very isolated, residing in a large, very empty void. I also discuss another extreme case: Andromeda IV, a dwarf considered here for the first time in light of MOND, with a very large mass discrepancy, Gamma =12, also conforming accurately to the MOND prediction. In both cases, MOND predicts Gamma, or the total dynamical mass at the last observed radius, from only the knowledge of the small mass of baryons. If MOND is accepted as the root of the mass discrepancy, these are just two more expected, albeit reassuring, conformities. However, in the framework of the dark-matter paradigm--where the mass discrepancy is strongly dependent on the buildup history of a galaxy--every new such conformity with a tight law is another difficult-to-understand surprise, and does carry a new import: What, in the LCDM paradigm, would prevent such galactic baryons from residing in a halo of half, or twice, the observed rotational velocities, instead of selecting exactly the velocities predicted by MOND? This conundrum is especially poignant for KK246, whose great isolation points to a relatively unique buildup history. This note underscores the individual importance of each galaxy as a new test, as opposed to the view of them all as a statistical ensemble.

preprint2011arXiv

MOND--particularly as modified inertia

After a succinct review of the MOND paradigm--with its phenomenology, and its various underlying theories--I concentrate on so called modified inertia (MI) formulations of MOND, which have so far received only little attention. These share with all MOND theories the salient MOND predictions, such as asymptotically flat rotation curves, and the universal mass-asymptotic-speed relation. My emphasis here is, however, on the fact that MI theories can differ substantially from their &#34;modified-gravity&#34; (MG) kin in predicting other phenomena. Because MI theories are non local in time, MOND effects depend on the full trajectory of a system, not only on its instantaneous state, as in MG theories. This may lead to rather different predictions for, e.g., the external-field effect (EFE): A subsystem, such as a globular cluster or a dwarf galaxy, moving in the field of a mother galaxy, or a galaxy in a cluster, may be subject to an EFE that depends on the accelerations all along its orbit, not only on the instantaneous value. And, it is even possible to construct MI theories with practically no EFE. Other predictions that may differ are also discussed. Since we do not yet have a full fledged, modified-inertia formulation, simple, heuristic models have been used to demonstrate these points.

preprint2010arXiv

Bimetric MOND gravity

A new relativistic formulation of MOND is advanced, involving two metrics as independent degrees of freedom: the MOND metric g_mn, to which alone matter couples, and an auxiliary metric g*_mn. The main idea hinges on the fact that we can form tensors from the difference, C^a_bc, of the Levi-Civita connections of the two metrics, and these act like gravitational accelerations. In the context of MOND we can form dimensionless `acceleration&#39; scalars, and functions thereof, from contractions of C^a_bc/a0. I look at a class of bimetric MOND theories governed by an action with the gravitational Lagrangian density b sqrt(g)R+a sqrt(g*) R* -2(gg*)^{1/4}f(k)a0^2M(U/a0^2), and with matter actions I(g_mn,psi)+I*(g*_mn,chi), with U a scalar quadratic in the C^a_bc, k=(g/g*)^{1/4}, and allowing for the existence of twin matter, chi, that couples to g*_mn alone. In particular, I concentrate on one interesting and simple choice of the scalar U. This theory introduces only one new constant, a0; it tends simply to General Relativity in the limit a0 goes to 0, and to a phenomenologically valid MOND theory in the nonrelativistic limit. The theory naturally gives MOND and &#34;dark energy&#34; effects from the same term in the action, both controlled by the MOND constant a0. As regards gravitational lensing by nonrelativistic systems--a holy grail for relativistic MOND theories--the theory predicts that the same potential that controls massive-particle motion also dictates lensing in the same way as in GR. This last result can be modified with other choices of U, but lensing is still enhanced and MOND-like, with an effective logarithmic potential.

preprint2010arXiv

Cosmological fluctuation growth in bimetric MOND

I look at the growth of weak density inhomogeneities of nonrelativistic matter, in bimetric-MOND (BIMOND) cosmology. I concentrate on matter-twin-matter-symmetric versions of BIMOND, and assume that, on average, the universe is symmetrically populated in the two sectors. MOND effects are absent in an exactly symmetric universe, apart from the appearance of a cosmological constant, Lambda~(a0/c)^2. MOND effects-local and cosmological-do enter when density inhomogeneities that differ in the two sectors appear and develop. MOND later takes its standard form in systems that are islands dominated by pure matter. I derive the nonrelativistic equations governing small-scale fluctuation growth. The equations split into two uncoupled systems, one for the sum, the other for the difference, of the fluctuations in the two sectors. The former is governed strictly by Newtonian dynamics. The latter is governed by MOND dynamics, which entails stronger gravity, and nonlinearity even for the smallest of perturbations. These cause the difference to grow faster than the sum, conducing to matter-twin-matter segregation. The nonlinearity also causes interaction between nested perturbations on different scales. Because matter and twin matter (TM) repel each other in the MOND regime, matter inhomogeneities grow not only by their own self gravity, but also through shepherding by flanking TM overdensitie. The relative importance of gravity and pressure in the MOND system depends also on the strength of the perturbation. The development of structure in the universe, in either sector, thus depends crucially on two initial fluctuation spectra: that of matter alone and that of the matter-TM difference. I also discuss the back reaction on cosmology of BIMOND effects that appear as &#34;phantom matter&#34; resulting from inhomogeneity differences between the two sectors.

preprint2010arXiv

Matter and twin matter in bimetric MOND

Bimetric MOND (BIMOND) theories, propounded recently, predict peculiar gravitational interactions between matter and twin matter (TM). Twin matter is hypothetical matter that might couple directly only to the second metric of the theory. Considerations of cosmology in the BIMOND framework suggest that such TM might exist and copy matter in its attributes. Here I investigate the indirect interactions that BIMOND theories predict between nonrelativistic masses of matter and TM. The most salient result is that in the deep-MOND regime of the matter-TM-symmetric theories, TM behaves as if it has a negative gravitational mass. To wit, interaction within each sector is attractive MOND gravity, but between matter and TM it is repulsive MOND gravity. In the high-acceleration regime, the interaction depends on a parameter, beta. For the favored value beta=1, matter and TM do not interact in this regime; for beta<1 they attract; and for beta>1 they repel each other. Such interactions may have substantial ramifications for all aspects of structure formation, such as matter distribution, peculiar velocities, and effects on the CMB. The repulsive interactions probably lead to segregation of matter and TM structures, leading, in turn, to intermeshing of the respective cosmic webs, with high-density nodes of one sector residing in the voids of the other (possibly conducing to efficient evacuation of the voids). Weak lensing by TM seems the best way to constrain its attributes. In the MOND regime a TM body acts on matter photons as a diverging lens. Strong lensing occurs in the high acceleration regime, and thus depends on the value of beta. For beta=1 no strong lensing effects of TM are expected. I also discuss briefly asymmetric theories (abridged).

preprint2010arXiv

New Physics at Low Accelerations (MOND): an Alternative to Dark Matter

I describe the MOND paradigm, which posits a departure from standard physics below a certain acceleration scale. This acceleration as deduced from the dynamics in galaxies is found mysteriously to agree with the cosmic acceleration scales defined by the present day expansion rate and by the density of `dark energy&#39;. I put special emphasis on phenomenology and on critical comparison with the competing paradigm based on classical dynamics plus cold dark matter. I also describe briefly nonrelativistic and relativistic MOND theories.

preprint2010arXiv

Quasi-linear formulation of MOND

A new formulation of MOND as a modified-potential theory of gravity is propounded. In effect, the theory dictates that the MOND potential phi produced by a mass distribution rho is a solution of the Poisson equation for the modified source density rho*=-(1/4 pi G)divergence(g), where g=nu(|gN|/a0)gN, and gN is the Newtonian acceleration field of rho. This makes phi simply the scalar potential of the algebraic acceleration field g. The theory thus involves solving only linear differential equations, with one nonlinear, algebraic step. It is derivable from an action, satisfies all the usual conservation laws, and gives the correct center-of-mass acceleration to composite bodies. The theory is akin in some respects to the nonlinear Poisson formulation of Bekenstein and Milgrom, but it is different from it, and is obviously easier to apply. The two theories are shown to emerge as natural modifications of a Palatini-type formulation of Newtonian gravity, and are members in a larger class of bi-potential theories.

preprint2009arXiv

MOND effects in the inner solar system

I pinpoint a previously unrecognized MOND effect that may act in the inner solar system, and is due to the galactic acceleration, g_g=eta*a0: a byproduct of the MOND external-field effect. Predictions of the effect are not generic to the MOND paradigm, but depend on the particular MOND formulation at hand. However, the modified-Poisson formulation, on which I concentrate, uniquely predicts a subtle anomaly that may be detected in planetary and spacecraft motions (and perhaps in other precision systems, such as binary pulsars), despite their very high accelerations, and even if the MOND interpolating function is arbitrarily close to unity at high accelerations. Near the sun, this anomaly appears as a quadrupole field, with the acceleration at position u from the sun being g_i(u)=-q_{ij}u^j, with q_{ij} diagonal, axisymmetric, and traceless: -2q_{xx}=-2q_{yy}=q_{zz}=q(eta)*(a0/R_M), where R_M=(MG/a0)^{1/2}=8*10^3 au is the MOND radius of the sun. The anomaly is described and analyzed as the Newtonian field of the fictitious cloud of ``phantom matter&#39;&#39; that hovers around the sun. I find, for the relevant range of eta values, and for a range of interpolating functions, mu(x), values of 10^{-2}<-q< 0.3, which turn out to be sensitive to the form of mu(x) around the MOND-to-Newtonian transition. This range verges on the present bounds from solar system measurements. There might thus exist favorable prospects for either measuring the effect, or constraining the theory and the relevant parameters.

preprint2009arXiv

The central surface density of &#34;dark halos&#34; predicted by MOND

Prompted by the recent claim, by Donato et al., of a quasi-universal central surface density of galaxy dark matter halos, I look at what MOND has to say on the subject. MOND, indeed, predicts a quasi-universal value of this quantity for objects of all masses and of any internal structure, provided they are mostly in the Newtonian regime; i.e., that their mean acceleration is at or above a0. The predicted value is qSm, with Sm= a0/2 pi G= 138 solar masses per square parsec for the nominal value of a0, and q a constant of order 1 that depends only on the form of the MOND interpolating function. This gives in the above units log(Sm)=2.14, which is consistent with that found by Doanato et al. of 2.15+-0.2. MOND predicts, on the other hand, that this quasi-universal value is not shared by objects with much lower mean accelerations. It permits halo central surface densities that are arbitrarily small, if the mean acceleration inside the object is small enough. However, for such low-surface-density objects, MOND predicts a halo surface density that scales as the square root of the baryonic one, and so the range of the former is much compressed relative to the latter. This explains, in part, the finding of Donato et al. that the universal value applies to low acceleration systems as well. Looking at literature results for a number of the lowest surface-density disk galaxies with rotation-curve analysis, I find that, indeed, their halo surface densities are systematically lower then the above &#34;universal&#34; value. The prediction of Sm as an upper limit, and accumulation value, of halo central surface densities, pertains, unlike most other MOND predictions, to a pure &#34;halo&#34; property, not to a relation between baryonic and &#34;dark matter&#34; properties.

preprint2009arXiv

The MOND limit from space-time scale invariance

The MOND limit is shown to follow from a requirement of space-time scale invariance of the equations of motion for nonrelativistic, purely gravitational systems; i.e., invariance of the equations of motion under (t,r) goes to (qt,qr), in the limit a0 goes to infinity. It is suggested that this should replace the definition of the MOND limit based on the low-acceleration behavior of a Newtonian-MOND interpolating function. In this way, the salient, deep-MOND results--asymptotically flat rotation curves, the mass-rotational-speed relation (baryonic Tully-Fisher relation), the Faber-Jackson relation, etc.--follow from a symmetry principle. For example, asymptotic flatness of rotation curves reflects the fact that radii change under scaling, while velocities do not. I then comment on the interpretation of the deep-MOND limit as one of &#34;zero mass&#34;: Rest masses, whose presence obstructs scaling symmetry, become negligible compared to the &#34;phantom&#34;, dynamical masses--those that some would attribute to dark matter. Unlike the former masses, the latter transform in a way that is consistent with the symmetry. Finally, I discuss the putative MOND-cosmology connection in light of another, previously known symmetry of the deep-MOND limit. In particular, it is suggested that MOND is related to the asymptotic de Sitter geometry of our universe. It is conjectured, for example, that in an exact de Sitter cosmos, deep-MOND physics would exactly apply to local systems. I also point out, in this connection, the possible relevance of a de Sitter-conformal-field-theory (dS/CFT) duality.

preprint2002arXiv

MOND mass-to-light ratios for galaxy groups

I estimate MOND M/L values for nine galaxy groups that were recently studied by Tully et al.. Instead of the large M/L values that they find with Newtonian dynamics (up to 1200 solar units) the MOND estimates cluster around 1 solar unit. Tully et al. find a systematic and significant difference between the M/L values of groups that do not contain luminous galaxies and those that do: Dwarfs-only groups have larger M/L values (by a factor of about 5). The MOND M/L values do not show this trend; the Newtonian disparity is traced back to the dwarfs-only groups having systematically smaller intrinsic accelerations (similar sizes, but rather smaller velocity dispersions).

preprint2001arXiv

Does MOND follow from the CDM paradigm?

In a recent paper, Kaplinghat and Turner (2001) (KT) advertise that MOND can be derived naturally in the CDM paradigm. They actually proceed to produce a more limited result: Every galaxy should have a transition radius, $r_t$, below which baryons dominate, and above which dark matter (DM) takes over; the acceleration at $r_t$ is nearly the same for all galaxies; and due to a coincidences this is of order $a_0\sim cH_0$. This follows from their tacit, intermediate result, whereby CDM halos of galaxies have a very nearly universal acceleration profile $a(r)\approx v^2(r)/r\approx A\hat a(r/\ell)$, where A is universal, and only the scale $\ell$ varies from halo to halo. (This remains so when baryons are added because they assume a universal baryon-collapse factor.) The KT scenario is phenomenologically wrong--observed galaxies are simply not like that. For example, it precludes altogether the existence of LSB galaxies, in which the acceleration is everywhere smaller than $a_0$. The phenomenologically sound outcome--i.e., the role of $a_0$ as a transition acceleration in high-surface-brightness galaxies--pertains to only a small part of the statement of MOND. There are several other, independent roles that $a_0\sim cH_0$ plays in MOND phenomenology, and other predictions of MOND, not related to the value of $a_0$, that are not explainable in the KT scenario. The results of KT also disagree with those of CDM simulations, which, as they now stand, do not reproduce any aspect of MOND phenomenology.

preprint2001arXiv

The shape of &#34;dark matter&#34; halos in disc galaxies according to the modified dynamics

Analyses of halo shapes for disc galaxies are said to give incongruous results. I point out that the modified dynamics (MOND) predicts for disc galaxies a distribution of fictitious dark matter that comprises two components: a pure disc and a rounder halo. The former dominates the true disc in regions of small accelerations, where it controls the z-dynamics in the disc (disc flaring etc.); it has a finite total mass. It also dominates the round component near the centre where the geometry is nearly planar. The second component controls motions far from the plane, has a total enclosed mass that diverges linearly with radius, and determines the rotation curve at large radii. Its ellipticity may be appreciable at small radii but vanishes asymptotically. This prediction of MOND differs from what one expects from galaxy-formation scenarios with dark matter. Analyses to date, which, as they do, assume one component--usually with a constant ellipticity, perforce give conflicting results for the best-value ellipticity, depending on whether they probe the disc or the sphere, small radii or large ones.

preprint1999arXiv

Stability of disk galaxies in the modified dynamics

General analytic arguments lead us to expect that in the modified dynamics (MOND) self-gravitating disks are more stable than their like in Newtonian dynamics. We study this question numerically, using a particle-mesh code based on a multi-grid solver for the (nonlinear) MOND field equation. We start with equilibrium distribution functions for MOND disk models having a smoothly truncated, exponential surface-density profiles and a constant Toomre $Q$ parameter. We find that, indeed, disks of a given ``temperature&#39;&#39; are locally more stable in MOND than in Newtonian dynamics. As regards global instability to bar formation, we find that as the mean acceleration in the disk is lowered, the stability of the disk is increased as we cross from the Newtonian to the MOND regime. The degree of stability levels off deep in the MOND regime, as expected from scaling laws in MOND. For the disk model we use, this maximum degree of stability is similar to the one imparted to a Newtonian disk by a halo three times as massive at five disk scale lengths.

preprint1999arXiv

The Modified Dynamics as a Vacuum Effect

Why does there appear in the modified dynamics (MOND) an acceleration constant, a0, of cosmological significance? An intriguing possibility is that MOND, indeed inertia itself--as embodied in the actions of free particles and fields, is due to effects of the vacuum. Either cosmology enters local dynamics by affecting the vacuum, and inertia in turn, through a0; or, the same vacuum effect enters both MOND (through a0) and cosmology (e.g. through a cosmological constant). For the vacuum to serve as substratum for inertia a body must be able to read in it its non-inertial motion; this indeed it can, by detecting Unruh-type radiation. A manifestation of the vacuum is also seen, even by inertial observers, in a non-trivial universe (marked, e.g., by curvature or expansion). A non-inertial observer in a nontrivial universe will see the combined effect. An observer on a constant-acceleration (a) trajectory in a de Sitter universe with cosmological constant L sees Unruh radiation of temperature T\propto [a^2+a0^2]^{1/2}, with a0=(Ł/3)^{1/2}. The temperature excess over what an inertial observer sees, T(a)-T(0), turns out to depend on a in the same way that MOND inertia does. An actual inertia-from-vacuum mechanism is still a far cry off.

preprint1996arXiv

Exact results concerning multifield moduli of two-phase composites

Chen has recently shown how the response matrix of a two-phase composite can be written as linear combinations of products of the component matrices. We elaborate on Chen&#39;s expansions by deriving them in a different way, which a. shows them in a different light, and b. permits us to generalize them further. As an application of our results we find exact microstructure-independent relations between the moduli of the two components and those of any composite. The body of these relations is equivalent to the compatibility relations of Milgrom and Shtrikman (1989), but they are cast in a rather different form, which has certain advantages. As an example, we show how any modulus of an arbitrary two-phase composite can be written in closed form as a linear combination of any other $n$ of its moduli, with coefficients that depend only on the component moduli, but not on the volume fractions, or the microstructure.

preprint1995arXiv

MOND and the seven dwarfs

Gerhard had recently analyzed the data on seven dwarf spheroidals, and concluded that these disagree with the predictions of MOND. We contend that this conclusion is anything but correct. With new data for three of the dwarfs the observations of all dwarfs are in compelling agreement with the predictions of MOND. Gerhard found MOND M/L values that fall around a few solar units, as expected if MOND is a valid alternative to dark matter. His sole cause for complaint was that some of his MOND M/L values were still outside the range of ``reasonable&#39;&#39; stellar values. This, we say, was easily attributable to uncertainties in the data, such as in the velocity dispersions, luminosities, core radii, etc., and in the assumptions that underlie the analysis, such as isotropic velocity distribution, light-distribution fits, etc.. There are now new, much improved determinations of the velocity dispersions for three of the dwarfs, in particular for the two dwarfs for which Gerhard found high MOND M/L values. In fact, within just the quoted errors on the velocity dispersions and the luminosities, the MOND M/L values for all seven dwarfs are now perfectly consistent with stellar values, with no need for dark matter.

preprint1995arXiv

Possible association of ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray events with strong gamma-ray bursts

We point out that each of the error boxes of the two highest-energy cosmic-ray shower events known, overlaps with that of a strong gamma-ray burst (GRB). The GRBs precede the cosmic rays by 5.5, and 11 months respectively. In one case the strongest known cosmic ray is paired with the strongest gamma-ray burst in the BATSE catalogue. The probability of this to have occurred by chance seems rather small. Without building on post-factum statistics, we think the above is remarkable enough to suggest that the cosmic ray and gamma-ray burst were produced by the same outburst. A time delay (and a small positional disparity) is expected, since the trajectory of a charged cosmic-ray particle is wriggled by intervening magnetic fields. We estimate that the Galaxy&#39;s field alone may produce a delay of the order observed. We discuss some of the implications that follow if such an association is confirmed. For example, the upper limit on the distance to the cosmic-ray source, combined with a much-better-determined position of the gamma-ray burst source, narrows greatly the volume in which to look for an optical counterpart. There is also useful information in the time delay regarding, e.g., intergalactic magnetic fields.