Paper detail

MOND and the unique void galaxy KK246

MOND predictions are compared with the mass discrepancy, Gamma (the dynamical-to-baryon mass ratio) deduced from the recently measured rotation curve, for the gas-rich, dwarf galaxy KK246, "the only galaxy observed in the local void". KK246 is special in at least two regards: a. It is, to my knowledge, the record holder for the largest mass discrepancy deduced from a rotation curve, Gamma= 15. b. It is very isolated, residing in a large, very empty void. I also discuss another extreme case: Andromeda IV, a dwarf considered here for the first time in light of MOND, with a very large mass discrepancy, Gamma =12, also conforming accurately to the MOND prediction. In both cases, MOND predicts Gamma, or the total dynamical mass at the last observed radius, from only the knowledge of the small mass of baryons. If MOND is accepted as the root of the mass discrepancy, these are just two more expected, albeit reassuring, conformities. However, in the framework of the dark-matter paradigm--where the mass discrepancy is strongly dependent on the buildup history of a galaxy--every new such conformity with a tight law is another difficult-to-understand surprise, and does carry a new import: What, in the LCDM paradigm, would prevent such galactic baryons from residing in a halo of half, or twice, the observed rotational velocities, instead of selecting exactly the velocities predicted by MOND? This conundrum is especially poignant for KK246, whose great isolation points to a relatively unique buildup history. This note underscores the individual importance of each galaxy as a new test, as opposed to the view of them all as a statistical ensemble.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.