Paper detail

MOND and the seven dwarfs

Gerhard had recently analyzed the data on seven dwarf spheroidals, and concluded that these disagree with the predictions of MOND. We contend that this conclusion is anything but correct. With new data for three of the dwarfs the observations of all dwarfs are in compelling agreement with the predictions of MOND. Gerhard found MOND M/L values that fall around a few solar units, as expected if MOND is a valid alternative to dark matter. His sole cause for complaint was that some of his MOND M/L values were still outside the range of ``reasonable'' stellar values. This, we say, was easily attributable to uncertainties in the data, such as in the velocity dispersions, luminosities, core radii, etc., and in the assumptions that underlie the analysis, such as isotropic velocity distribution, light-distribution fits, etc.. There are now new, much improved determinations of the velocity dispersions for three of the dwarfs, in particular for the two dwarfs for which Gerhard found high MOND M/L values. In fact, within just the quoted errors on the velocity dispersions and the luminosities, the MOND M/L values for all seven dwarfs are now perfectly consistent with stellar values, with no need for dark matter.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.