Paper detail

Global Deep-MOND Parameter as a Theory Discriminant

Different formulations of MOND predict somewhat different rotation curves for the same mass distribution. Here I consider a global attribute of the rotation curve that might provide a convenient discriminant between theories when applied to isolated, pure-disk galaxies that are everywhere deep in the MOND regime. This parameter is Q=<V^2>/V0^2, where <V^2> is the mean squared rotational speed of the galaxy, and V0 is the asymptotic (constant) rotational speed. The comparison between the observed and predicted values of Q is oblivious to the distance, the inclination, the mass, and the size of the disk, and to the form of the interpolating function. For the known modified-gravity theories Q is predicted to be a universal constant (independent of the mass distribution in the disk): Q=2/3. The predicted Q value for modified-inertia theories does depend on the mass distribution. However, surprisingly, I find here that it varies only little among a very wide range of mass distributions, Q=0.73+-0.01. While the difference between the theories amounts to only about 5 percent in the predicted RMS velocity, a good enough sample of galaxies may provide the first discerning test between the two classes of theories.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.