BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mingsheng Ying

Mingsheng Ying contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-phLogic in Computer ScienceProgramming LanguagesComputation and LanguageEmerging TechnologiesFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
13works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Algebraic Reasoning of Quantum Programs via Non-idempotent Kleene Algebra

We investigate the algebraic reasoning of quantum programs inspired by the success of classical program analysis based on Kleene algebra. One prominent example of such is the famous Kleene Algebra with Tests (KAT), which has furnished both theoretical insights and practical tools. The succinctness of algebraic reasoning would be especially desirable for scalable analysis of quantum programs, given the involvement of exponential-size matrices in most of the existing methods. A few key features of KAT including the idempotent law and the nice properties of classical tests, however, fail to hold in the context of quantum programs due to their unique quantum features, especially in branching. We propose Non-idempotent Kleene Algebra (NKA) as a natural alternative and identify complete and sound semantic models for NKA as well as their quantum interpretations. In light of applications of KAT, we demonstrate algebraic proofs in NKA of quantum compiler optimization and the normal form of quantum while-programs. Moreover, we extend NKA with Tests (i.e., NKAT), where tests model quantum predicates following effect algebra, and illustrate how to encode propositional quantum Hoare logic as NKAT theorems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Birkhoff-von Neumann Quantum Logic as an Assertion Language for Quantum Programs

A first-order logic with quantum variables is needed as an assertion language for specifying and reasoning about various properties (e.g. correctness) of quantum programs. Surprisingly, such a logic is missing in the literature, and the existing first-order Birkhoff-von Neumann quantum logic deals with only classical variables and quantifications over them. In this paper, we fill in this gap by introducing a first-order extension of Birkhoff-von Neumann quantum logic with universal and existential quantifiers over quantum variables. Examples are presented to show our logic is particularly suitable for specifying some important properties studied in quantum computation and quantum information. We further incorporate this logic into quantum Hoare logic as an assertion logic so that it can play a role similar to that of first-order logic for classical Hoare logic and BI-logic for separation logic. In particular, we show how it can be used to define and derive quantum generalisations of some adaptation rules that have been applied to significantly simplify verification of classical programs. It is expected that the assertion logic defined in this paper - first-order quantum logic with quantum variables - can be combined with various quantum program logics to serve as a solid logical foundation upon which verification tools can be built using proof assistants such as Coq and Isabelle/HOL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Equivalence Checking of Quantum Finite-State Machines

In this paper, we introduce the model of quantum Mealy machines and study the equivalence checking and minimisation problems of them. Two efficient algorithms are developed for checking equivalence of two states in the same machine and for checking equivalence of two machines. As an application, they are used in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. Moreover, the minimisation problem is proved to be in $\textbf{PSPACE}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Equivalence Checking of Sequential Quantum Circuits

We define a formal framework for equivalence checking of sequential quantum circuits. The model we adopt is a quantum state machine, which is a natural quantum generalisation of Mealy machines. A major difficulty in checking quantum circuits (but not present in checking classical circuits) is that the state spaces of quantum circuits are continuums. This difficulty is resolved by our main theorem showing that equivalence checking of two quantum Mealy machines can be done with input sequences that are taken from some chosen basis (which are finite) and have a length quadratic in the dimensions of the state Hilbert spaces of the machines. Based on this theoretical result, we develop an (and to the best of our knowledge, the first) algorithm for checking equivalence of sequential quantum circuits with running time $\mathcal{O}(2^{3m+5l}(2^{3m}+2^{3l}))$, where $m$ and $l$ denote the numbers of input and internal qubits, respectively. The complexity of our algorithm is comparable with that of the known algorithms for checking classical sequential circuits in the sense that both are exponential in the number of (qu)bits. Several case studies and experiments are presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quantum Algorithm for Fidelity Estimation

For two unknown mixed quantum states $ρ$ and $σ$ in an $N$-dimensional Hilbert space, computing their fidelity $F(ρ,σ)$ is a basic problem with many important applications in quantum computing and quantum information, for example verification and characterization of the outputs of a quantum computer, and design and analysis of quantum algorithms. In this paper, we propose a quantum algorithm that solves this problem in $\operatorname{poly}(\log (N), r, 1/\varepsilon)$ time, where $r$ is the lower rank of $ρ$ and $σ$, and $\varepsilon$ is the desired precision, provided that the purifications of $ρ$ and $σ$ are prepared by quantum oracles. This algorithm exhibits an exponential speedup over the best known algorithm (based on quantum state tomography) which has time complexity polynomial in $N$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quantum Random Access Stored-Program Machines

Random access machines (RAMs) and random access stored-program machines (RASPs) are models of computing that are closer to the architecture of real-world computers than Turing machines (TMs). They are also convenient in complexity analysis of algorithms. The relationships between RAMs, RASPs and TMs are well-studied. However, clear relationships between their quantum counterparts are still missing in the literature. We fill in this gap by formally defining the models of quantum random access machines (QRAMs) and quantum random access stored-program machines (QRASPs) and clarifying the relationships between QRAMs, QRASPs and quantum Turing machines (QTMs). In particular, we show that $\textbf{P} \subseteq \textbf{EQRAMP} \subseteq \textbf{EQP} \subseteq \textbf{BQP} = \textbf{BQRAMP}$, where $\textbf{EQRAMP}$ and $\textbf{BQRAMP}$ stand for the sets of problems that can be solved by polynomial-time QRAMs with certainty and bounded-error, respectively. At the heart of our proof, is a standardisation of QTM with an extended halting scheme, which is of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quantum Weakest Preconditions for Reasoning about Expected Runtimes of Quantum Programs (Extended Version)

We study expected runtimes for quantum programs. Inspired by recent work on probabilistic programs, we first define expected runtime as a generalisation of quantum weakest precondition. Then, we show that the expected runtime of a quantum program can be represented as the expectation of an observable (in physics). A method for computing the expected runtimes of quantum programs in finite-dimensional state spaces is developed. Several examples are provided as applications of this method, including computing the expected runtime of quantum Bernoulli Factory -- a quantum algorithm for generating random numbers. In particular, using our new method, an open problem of computing the expected runtime of quantum random walks introduced by Ambainis et al. (STOC 2001) is solved.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

VeriQBench: A Benchmark for Multiple Types of Quantum Circuits

In this paper, we introduce VeriQBench -- an open source benchmark for quantum circuits. It offers high-level quantum circuit abstractions of various circuit types, including 1) combinational, 2) dynamic, 3) sequential, and 4) variational quantum circuits, which cover almost all existing types of quantum circuits in the literature. Meanwhile, VeriQBench is a versatile benchmark which can be used in verifying quantum software for different applications, as is evidenced by the existing works including quantum circuit verification (e.g., equivalence checking [Hon+21a; WLY21] and model checking [Yin21]), simulation (e.g., fault simulation), testing (e.g., test pattern generation [CY22]) and debugging (e.g., runtime assertions [Li+20b]). All the circuits are described in OpenQASM and are validated on Qiskit and QCOR simulators. With the hope that it can be used by other researchers, VeriQBench is released at: https://github.com/Veri-Q/Benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Quantum Interpretation of Bunched Logic for Quantum Separation Logic

We propose a model of the substructural logic of Bunched Implications (BI) that is suitable for reasoning about quantum states. In our model, the separating conjunction of BI describes separable quantum states. We develop a program logic where pre- and post-conditions are BI formulas describing quantum states -- the program logic can be seen as a counterpart of separation logic for imperative quantum programs. We exercise the logic for proving the security of quantum one-time pad and secret sharing, and we show how the program logic can be used to discover a flaw in Google Cirq's tutorial on the Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

An HHL-Based Algorithm for Computing Hitting Probabilities of Quantum Random Walks

We present a novel application of the HHL (Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd) algorithm -- a quantum algorithm solving systems of linear equations -- in solving an open problem about quantum random walks, namely computing hitting (or absorption) probabilities of a general (not only Hadamard) one-dimensional quantum random walks with two absorbing boundaries. This is achieved by a simple observation that the problem of computing hitting probabilities of quantum random walks can be reduced to inverting a matrix. Then a quantum algorithm with the HHL algorithm as a subroutine is developed for solving the problem, which is faster than the known classical algorithms by numerical experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Quantum Hoare logic with classical variables

Hoare logic provides a syntax-oriented method to reason about program correctness and has been proven effective in the verification of classical and probabilistic programs. Existing proposals for quantum Hoare logic either lack completeness or support only quantum variables, thus limiting their capability in practical use. In this paper, we propose a quantum Hoare logic for a simple while language which involves both classical and quantum variables. Its soundness and relative completeness are proven for both partial and total correctness of quantum programs written in the language. Remarkably, with novel definitions of classical-quantum states and corresponding assertions, the logic system is quite simple and similar to the traditional Hoare logic for classical programs. Furthermore, to simplify reasoning in real applications, auxiliary proof rules are provided which support standard logical operation in the classical part of assertions, and of super-operator application in the quantum part. Finally, a series of practical quantum algorithms, in particular the whole algorithm of Shor's factorisation, are formally verified to show the effectiveness of the logic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Verification of Distributed Quantum Programs

Distributed quantum systems and especially the Quantum Internet have the ever-increasing potential to fully demonstrate the power of quantum computation. This is particularly true given that developing a general-purpose quantum computer is much more difficult than connecting many small quantum devices. One major challenge of implementing distributed quantum systems is programming them and verifying their correctness. In this paper, we propose a CSP-like distributed programming language to facilitate the specification and verification of such systems. After presenting its operational and denotational semantics, we develop a Hoare-style logic for distributed quantum programs and establish its soundness and (relative) completeness with respect to both partial and total correctness. The effectiveness of the logic is demonstrated by its applications in the verification of quantum teleportation and local implementation of non-local CNOT gates, two important algorithms widely used in distributed quantum systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Proq: Projection-based Runtime Assertions for Debugging on a Quantum Computer

In this paper, we propose Proq, a runtime assertion scheme for testing and debugging quantum programs on a quantum computer. The predicates in Proq are represented by projections (or equivalently, closed subspaces of the state space), following Birkhoff-von Neumann quantum logic. The satisfaction of a projection by a quantum state can be directly checked upon a small number of projective measurements rather than a large number of repeated executions. On the theory side, we rigorously prove that checking projection-based assertions can help locate bugs or statistically assure that the semantic function of the tested program is close to what we expect, for both exact and approximate quantum programs. On the practice side, we consider hardware constraints and introduce several techniques to transform the assertions, making them directly executable on the measurement-restricted quantum computers. We also propose to achieve simplified assertion implementation using local projection technique with soundness guaranteed. We compare Proq with existing quantum program assertions and demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of Proq by its applications to assert two ingenious quantum algorithms, the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm and Shor's algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access