BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
March Boedihardjo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We show how randomized rounding based on Grothendieck's identity can be used to prove a nearly tight bound on the covariance loss--the amount of covariance that is lost by taking conditional expectation. This result yields a new type of weak Szemeredi regularity lemma for positive semidefinite matrices and kernels. Moreover, it can be used to construct differentially private synthetic data.
The protection of private information is of vital importance in data-driven research, business, and government. The conflict between privacy and utility has triggered intensive research in the computer science and statistics communities, who have developed a variety of methods for privacy-preserving data release. Among the main concepts that have emerged are anonymity and differential privacy. Today, another solution is gaining traction, synthetic data. However, the road to privacy is paved with NP-hard problems. In this paper we focus on the NP-hard challenge to develop a synthetic data generation method that is computationally efficient, comes with provable privacy guarantees, and rigorously quantifies data utility. We solve a relaxed version of this problem by studying a fundamental, but a first glance completely unrelated, problem in probability concerning the concept of covariance loss. Namely, we find a nearly optimal and constructive answer to the question how much information is lost when we take conditional expectation. Surprisingly, this excursion into theoretical probability produces mathematical techniques that allow us to derive constructive, approximately optimal solutions to difficult applied problems concerning microaggregation, privacy, and synthetic data.
In a world where artificial intelligence and data science become omnipresent, data sharing is increasingly locking horns with data-privacy concerns. Differential privacy has emerged as a rigorous framework for protecting individual privacy in a statistical database, while releasing useful statistical information about the database. The standard way to implement differential privacy is to inject a sufficient amount of noise into the data. However, in addition to other limitations of differential privacy, this process of adding noise will affect data accuracy and utility. Another approach to enable privacy in data sharing is based on the concept of synthetic data. The goal of synthetic data is to create an as-realistic-as-possible dataset, one that not only maintains the nuances of the original data, but does so without risk of exposing sensitive information. The combination of differential privacy with synthetic data has been suggested as a best-of-both-worlds solutions. In this work, we propose the first noisefree method to construct differentially private synthetic data; we do this through a mechanism called "private sampling". Using the Boolean cube as benchmark data model, we derive explicit bounds on accuracy and privacy of the constructed synthetic data. The key mathematical tools are hypercontractivity, duality, and empirical processes. A core ingredient of our private sampling mechanism is a rigorous "marginal correction" method, which has the remarkable property that importance reweighting can be utilized to exactly match the marginals of the sample to the marginals of the population.
The two-step spectral clustering method, which consists of the Laplacian eigenmap and a rounding step, is a widely used method for graph partitioning. It can be seen as a natural relaxation to the NP-hard minimum ratio cut problem. In this paper we study the central question: when is spectral clustering able to find the global solution to the minimum ratio cut problem? First we provide a condition that naturally depends on the intra- and inter-cluster connectivities of a given partition under which we may certify that this partition is the solution to the minimum ratio cut problem. Then we develop a deterministic two-to-infinity norm perturbation bound for the the invariant subspace of the graph Laplacian that corresponds to the $k$ smallest eigenvalues. Finally by combining these two results we give a condition under which spectral clustering is guaranteed to output the global solution to the minimum ratio cut problem, which serves as a performance guarantee for spectral clustering.