BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Madhur Tulsiani

Madhur Tulsiani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COMachine Learningmath.PRmath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Concentration of polynomial random matrices via Efron-Stein inequalities

Analyzing concentration of large random matrices is a common task in a wide variety of fields. Given independent random variables, many tools are available to analyze random matrices whose entries are linear in the variables, e.g. the matrix-Bernstein inequality. However, in many applications, we need to analyze random matrices whose entries are polynomials in the variables. These arise naturally in the analysis of spectral algorithms, e.g., Hopkins et al. [STOC 2016], Moitra-Wein [STOC 2019]; and in lower bounds for semidefinite programs based on the Sum of Squares hierarchy, e.g. Barak et al. [FOCS 2016], Jones et al. [FOCS 2021]. In this work, we present a general framework to obtain such bounds, based on the matrix Efron-Stein inequalities developed by Paulin-Mackey-Tropp [Annals of Probability 2016]. The Efron-Stein inequality bounds the norm of a random matrix by the norm of another simpler (but still random) matrix, which we view as arising by "differentiating" the starting matrix. By recursively differentiating, our framework reduces the main task to analyzing far simpler matrices. For Rademacher variables, these simpler matrices are in fact deterministic and hence, analyzing them is far easier. For general non-Rademacher variables, the task reduces to scalar concentration, which is much easier. Moreover, in the setting of polynomial matrices, our results generalize the work of Paulin-Mackey-Tropp. Using our basic framework, we recover known bounds in the literature for simple "tensor networks" and "dense graph matrices". Using our general framework, we derive bounds for "sparse graph matrices", which were obtained only recently by Jones et al. [FOCS 2021] using a nontrivial application of the trace power method, and was a core component in their work. We expect our framework to be helpful for other applications involving concentration phenomena for nonlinear random matrices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

An Arithmetic Analogue of Fox's Triangle Removal Argument

We give an arithmetic version of the recent proof of the triangle removal lemma by Fox [Fox11], for the group $\mathbb{F}_2^n$. A triangle in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ is a triple $(x,y,z)$ such that $x+y+z = 0$. The triangle removal lemma for $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ states that for every $ε> 0$ there is a $δ> 0$, such that if a subset $A$ of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ requires the removal of at least $ε\cdot 2^n$ elements to make it triangle-free, then it must contain at least $δ\cdot 2^{2n}$ triangles. This problem was first studied by Green [Gre05] who proved a lower bound on $δ$ using an arithmetic regularity lemma. Regularity based lower bounds for triangle removal in graphs were recently improved by Fox and we give a direct proof of an analogous improvement for triangle removal in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$. The improved lower bound was already known to follow (for triangle-removal in all groups), using Fox's removal lemma for directed cycles and a reduction by Král, Serra and Vena [KSV09] (see [Fox11,CF13]). The purpose of this note is to provide a direct Fourier-analytic proof for the group $\mathbb{F}_2^n.$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

From Weak to Strong LP Gaps for all CSPs

We study the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) by linear programming (LP) relaxations. We show that for every CSP, the approximation obtained by a basic LP relaxation, is no weaker than the approximation obtained using relaxations given by $Ω\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)$ levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy on instances of size $n$. It was proved by Chan et al. [FOCS 2013] that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than relaxations obtained by a super-constant levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy.. Combining this with our result also implies that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than the basic LP. Using our techniques, we also simplify and strengthen the result by Khot et al. [STOC 2014] on (strong) approximation resistance for LPs. They provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which $Ω(\log \log n)$ levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy cannot achieve an approximation better than a random assignment. We simplify their proof and strengthen the bound to $Ω\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)$ levels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A Characterization of Approximation Resistance

A predicate f:{-1,1}^k -> {0,1} with ρ(f) = \frac{|f^{-1}(1)|}{2^k} is called {\it approximation resistant} if given a near-satisfiable instance of CSP(f), it is computationally hard to find an assignment that satisfies at least ρ(f)+Ω(1) fraction of the constraints. We present a complete characterization of approximation resistant predicates under the Unique Games Conjecture. We also present characterizations in the {\it mixed} linear and semi-definite programming hierarchy and the Sherali-Adams linear programming hierarchy. In the former case, the characterization coincides with the one based on UGC. Each of the two characterizations is in terms of existence of a probability measure with certain symmetry properties on a natural convex polytope associated with the predicate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Algorithmic regularity for polynomials and applications

In analogy with the regularity lemma of Szemerédi, regularity lemmas for polynomials shown by Green and Tao (Contrib. Discrete Math. 2009) and by Kaufman and Lovett (FOCS 2008) modify a given collection of polynomials \calF = {P_1,...,P_m} to a new collection \calF' so that the polynomials in \calF' are "pseudorandom". These lemmas have various applications, such as (special cases) of Reed-Muller testing and worst-case to average-case reductions for polynomials. However, the transformation from \calF to \calF' is not algorithmic for either regularity lemma. We define new notions of regularity for polynomials, which are analogous to the above, but which allow for an efficient algorithm to compute the pseudorandom collection \calF'. In particular, when the field is of high characteristic, in polynomial time, we can refine \calF into \calF' where every nonzero linear combination of polynomials in \calF' has desirably small Gowers norm. Using the algorithmic regularity lemmas, we show that if a polynomial P of degree d is within (normalized) Hamming distance 1-1/|F| -\eps of some unknown polynomial of degree k over a prime field F (for k < d < |F|), then there is an efficient algorithm for finding a degree-k polynomial Q, which is within distance 1-1/|F| -ηof P, for some ηdepending on \eps. This can be thought of as decoding the Reed-Muller code of order k beyond the list decoding radius (finding one close codeword), when the received word P itself is a polynomial of degree d (with k < d < |F|). We also obtain an algorithmic version of the worst-case to average-case reductions by Kaufman and Lovett. They show that if a polynomial of degree d can be weakly approximated by a polynomial of lower degree, then it can be computed exactly using a collection of polynomials of degree at most d-1. We give an efficient (randomized) algorithm to find this collection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Cuts in Cartesian Products of Graphs

The k-fold Cartesian product of a graph G is defined as a graph on k-tuples of vertices, where two tuples are connected if they form an edge in one of the positions and are equal in the rest. Starting with G as a single edge gives G^k as a k-dimensional hypercube. We study the distributions of edges crossed by a cut in G^k across the copies of G in different positions. This is a generalization of the notion of influences for cuts on the hypercube. We show the analogues of results of Kahn, Kalai, and Linial (KKL Theorem [KahnKL88]) and that of Friedgut (Friedgut's Junta theorem [Friedgut98]), for the setting of Cartesian products of arbitrary graphs. Our proofs extend the arguments of Rossignol [Rossignol06] and of Falik and Samorodnitsky [FalikS07], to the case of arbitrary Cartesian products. We also extend the work on studying isoperimetric constants for these graphs [HoudreT96, ChungT98] to the value of semidefinite relaxations for edge-expansion. We connect the optimal values of the relaxations for computing expansion, given by various semidefinite hierarchies, for G and G^k.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Algorithms and Hardness for Subspace Approximation

The subspace approximation problem Subspace($k$,$p$) asks for a $k$-dimensional linear subspace that fits a given set of points optimally, where the error for fitting is a generalization of the least squares fit and uses the $\ell_{p}$ norm instead. Most of the previous work on subspace approximation has focused on small or constant $k$ and $p$, using coresets and sampling techniques from computational geometry. In this paper, extending another line of work based on convex relaxation and rounding, we give a polynomial time algorithm, \emph{for any $k$ and any $p \geq 2$}, with the approximation guarantee roughly $γ_{p} \sqrt{2 - \frac{1}{n-k}}$, where $γ_{p}$ is the $p$-th moment of a standard normal random variable N(0,1). We show that the convex relaxation we use has an integrality gap (or "rank gap") of $γ_{p} (1 - ε)$, for any constant $ε> 0$. Finally, we show that assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, the subspace approximation problem is hard to approximate within a factor better than $γ_{p} (1 - ε)$, for any constant $ε> 0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Reductions Between Expansion Problems

The Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis (Raghavendra, Steurer, STOC 2010) is a natural hardness assumption concerning the problem of approximating the edge expansion of small sets in graphs. This hardness assumption is closely connected to the Unique Games Conjecture (Khot, STOC 2002). In particular, the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis implies the Unique Games Conjecture (Raghavendra, Steurer, STOC 2010). Our main result is that the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis is in fact equivalent to a variant of the Unique Games Conjecture. More precisely, the hypothesis is equivalent to the Unique Games Conjecture restricted to instance with a fairly mild condition on the expansion of small sets. Alongside, we obtain the first strong hardness of approximation results for the Balanced Separator and Minimum Linear Arrangement problems. Before, no such hardness was known for these problems even assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. These results not only establish the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis as a natural unifying hypothesis that implies the Unique Games Conjecture, all its consequences and, in addition, hardness results for other problems like Balanced Separator and Minimum Linear Arrangement, but our results also show that the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis problem lies at the combinatorial heart of the Unique Games Conjecture. The key technical ingredient is a new way of exploiting the structure of the Unique Games instances obtained from the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis via (Raghavendra, Steurer, 2010). This additional structure allows us to modify standard reductions in a way that essentially destroys their local-gadget nature. Using this modification, we can argue about the expansion in the graphs produced by the reduction without relying on expansion properties of the underlying Unique Games instance (which would be impossible for a local-gadget reduction).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access