BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Arnab Bhattacharyya

Arnab Bhattacharyya contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine LearningInformation Theorymath.ITmath.STStatistics TheoryArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityComputationDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
12topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

An Adaptive Kernel Approach to Federated Learning of Heterogeneous Causal Effects

We propose a new causal inference framework to learn causal effects from multiple, decentralized data sources in a federated setting. We introduce an adaptive transfer algorithm that learns the similarities among the data sources by utilizing Random Fourier Features to disentangle the loss function into multiple components, each of which is associated with a data source. The data sources may have different distributions; the causal effects are independently and systematically incorporated. The proposed method estimates the similarities among the sources through transfer coefficients, and hence requiring no prior information about the similarity measures. The heterogeneous causal effects can be estimated with no sharing of the raw training data among the sources, thus minimizing the risk of privacy leak. We also provide minimax lower bounds to assess the quality of the parameters learned from the disparate sources. The proposed method is empirically shown to outperform the baselines on decentralized data sources with dissimilar distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Independence Testing for Bounded Degree Bayesian Network

We study the following independence testing problem: given access to samples from a distribution $P$ over $\{0,1\}^n$, decide whether $P$ is a product distribution or whether it is $\varepsilon$-far in total variation distance from any product distribution. For arbitrary distributions, this problem requires $\exp(n)$ samples. We show in this work that if $P$ has a sparse structure, then in fact only linearly many samples are required. Specifically, if $P$ is Markov with respect to a Bayesian network whose underlying DAG has in-degree bounded by $d$, then $\tildeΘ(2^{d/2}\cdot n/\varepsilon^2)$ samples are necessary and sufficient for independence testing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Low Degree Testing over the Reals

We study the problem of testing whether a function $f: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ is a polynomial of degree at most $d$ in the \emph{distribution-free} testing model. Here, the distance between functions is measured with respect to an unknown distribution $\mathcal{D}$ over $\mathbb{R}^n$ from which we can draw samples. In contrast to previous work, we do not assume that $\mathcal{D}$ has finite support. We design a tester that given query access to $f$, and sample access to $\mathcal{D}$, makes $(d/\varepsilon)^{O(1)}$ many queries to $f$, accepts with probability $1$ if $f$ is a polynomial of degree $d$, and rejects with probability at least $2/3$ if every degree-$d$ polynomial $P$ disagrees with $f$ on a set of mass at least $\varepsilon$ with respect to $\mathcal{D}$. Our result also holds under mild assumptions when we receive only a polynomial number of bits of precision for each query to $f$, or when $f$ can only be queried on rational points representable using a logarithmic number of bits. Along the way, we prove a new stability theorem for multivariate polynomials that may be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Universal 1-Bit Compressive Sensing for Bounded Dynamic Range Signals

A {\em universal 1-bit compressive sensing (CS)} scheme consists of a measurement matrix $A$ such that all signals $x$ belonging to a particular class can be approximately recovered from $\textrm{sign}(Ax)$. 1-bit CS models extreme quantization effects where only one bit of information is revealed per measurement. We focus on universal support recovery for 1-bit CS in the case of {\em sparse} signals with bounded {\em dynamic range}. Specifically, a vector $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ is said to have sparsity $k$ if it has at most $k$ nonzero entries, and dynamic range $R$ if the ratio between its largest and smallest nonzero entries is at most $R$ in magnitude. Our main result shows that if the entries of the measurement matrix $A$ are i.i.d.~Gaussians, then under mild assumptions on the scaling of $k$ and $R$, the number of measurements needs to be $\tildeΩ(Rk^{3/2})$ to recover the support of $k$-sparse signals with dynamic range $R$ using $1$-bit CS. In addition, we show that a near-matching $O(R k^{3/2} \log n)$ upper bound follows as a simple corollary of known results. The $k^{3/2}$ scaling contrasts with the known lower bound of $\tildeΩ(k^2 \log n)$ for the number of measurements to recover the support of arbitrary $k$-sparse signals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Distance Approximation for Structured High-Dimensional Distributions via Learning

We design efficient distance approximation algorithms for several classes of structured high-dimensional distributions. Specifically, we show algorithms for the following problems: - Given sample access to two Bayesian networks $P_1$ and $P_2$ over known directed acyclic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ having $n$ nodes and bounded in-degree, approximate $d_{tv}(P_1,P_2)$ to within additive error $ε$ using $poly(n,ε)$ samples and time - Given sample access to two ferromagnetic Ising models $P_1$ and $P_2$ on $n$ variables with bounded width, approximate $d_{tv}(P_1, P_2)$ to within additive error $ε$ using $poly(n,ε)$ samples and time - Given sample access to two $n$-dimensional Gaussians $P_1$ and $P_2$, approximate $d_{tv}(P_1, P_2)$ to within additive error $ε$ using $poly(n,ε)$ samples and time - Given access to observations from two causal models $P$ and $Q$ on $n$ variables that are defined over known causal graphs, approximate $d_{tv}(P_a, Q_a)$ to within additive error $ε$ using $poly(n,ε)$ samples, where $P_a$ and $Q_a$ are the interventional distributions obtained by the intervention $do(A=a)$ on $P$ and $Q$ respectively for a particular variable $A$. Our results are the first efficient distance approximation algorithms for these well-studied problems. They are derived using a simple and general connection to distribution learning algorithms. The distance approximation algorithms imply new efficient algorithms for {\em tolerant} testing of closeness of the above-mentioned structured high-dimensional distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Statistics for Sparse Graphical Models from Truncated Samples

In this paper, we study high-dimensional estimation from truncated samples. We focus on two fundamental and classical problems: (i) inference of sparse Gaussian graphical models and (ii) support recovery of sparse linear models. (i) For Gaussian graphical models, suppose $d$-dimensional samples ${\bf x}$ are generated from a Gaussian $N(μ,Σ)$ and observed only if they belong to a subset $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$. We show that $μ$ and $Σ$ can be estimated with error $ε$ in the Frobenius norm, using $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{\textrm{nz}(Σ^{-1})}{ε^2}\right)$ samples from a truncated $\mathcal{N}(μ,Σ)$ and having access to a membership oracle for $S$. The set $S$ is assumed to have non-trivial measure under the unknown distribution but is otherwise arbitrary. (ii) For sparse linear regression, suppose samples $({\bf x},y)$ are generated where $y = {\bf x}^\top{Ω^*} + \mathcal{N}(0,1)$ and $({\bf x}, y)$ is seen only if $y$ belongs to a truncation set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}$. We consider the case that $Ω^*$ is sparse with a support set of size $k$. Our main result is to establish precise conditions on the problem dimension $d$, the support size $k$, the number of observations $n$, and properties of the samples and the truncation that are sufficient to recover the support of $Ω^*$. Specifically, we show that under some mild assumptions, only $O(k^2 \log d)$ samples are needed to estimate $Ω^*$ in the $\ell_\infty$-norm up to a bounded error. For both problems, our estimator minimizes the sum of the finite population negative log-likelihood function and an $\ell_1$-regularization term.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations

We study the problem of efficiently estimating the effect of an intervention on a single variable (atomic interventions) using observational samples in a causal Bayesian network. Our goal is to give algorithms that are efficient in both time and sample complexity in a non-parametric setting. Tian and Pearl (AAAI `02) have exactly characterized the class of causal graphs for which causal effects of atomic interventions can be identified from observational data. We make their result quantitative. Suppose P is a causal model on a set $\vec{V}$ of n observable variables with respect to a given causal graph G with observable distribution $P$. Let $P_x$ denote the interventional distribution over the observables with respect to an intervention of a designated variable X with x. Assuming that $G$ has bounded in-degree, bounded c-components ($k$), and that the observational distribution is identifiable and satisfies certain strong positivity condition, we give an algorithm that takes $m=\tilde{O}(nε^{-2})$ samples from $P$ and $O(mn)$ time, and outputs with high probability a description of a distribution $\hat{P}$ such that $d_{\mathrm{TV}}(P_x, \hat{P}) \leq ε$, and: 1. [Evaluation] the description can return in $O(n)$ time the probability $\hat{P}(\vec{v})$ for any assignment $\vec{v}$ to $\vec{V}$ 2. [Generation] the description can return an iid sample from $\hat{P}$ in $O(n)$ time. We also show lower bounds for the sample complexity showing that our sample complexity has an optimal dependence on the parameters $n$ and $ε$, as well as if $k=1$ on the strong positivity parameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Optimal Testing of Reed-Muller Codes

We consider the problem of testing if a given function f : F_2^n -> F_2 is close to any degree d polynomial in n variables, also known as the Reed-Muller testing problem. The Gowers norm is based on a natural 2^{d+1}-query test for this property. Alon et al. [AKKLR05] rediscovered this test and showed that it accepts every degree d polynomial with probability 1, while it rejects functions that are Omega(1)-far with probability Omega(1/(d 2^{d})). We give an asymptotically optimal analysis of this test, and show that it rejects functions that are (even only) Omega(2^{-d})-far with Omega(1)-probability (so the rejection probability is a universal constant independent of d and n). This implies a tight relationship between the (d+1)st Gowers norm of a function and its maximal correlation with degree d polynomials, when the correlation is close to 1. Our proof works by induction on n and yields a new analysis of even the classical Blum-Luby-Rubinfeld [BLR93] linearity test, for the setting of functions mapping F_2^n to F_2. The optimality follows from a tighter analysis of counterexamples to the "inverse conjecture for the Gowers norm" constructed by [GT09,LMS08]. Our result has several implications. First, it shows that the Gowers norm test is tolerant, in that it also accepts close codewords. Second, it improves the parameters of an XOR lemma for polynomials given by Viola and Wigderson [VW07]. Third, it implies a "query hierarchy" result for property testing of affine-invariant properties. That is, for every function q(n), it gives an affine-invariant property that is testable with O(q(n))-queries, but not with o(q(n))-queries, complementing an analogous result of [GKNR09] for graph properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Separations of Matroid Freeness Properties

Properties of Boolean functions on the hypercube invariant with respect to linear transformations of the domain are among the most well-studied properties in the context of property testing. In this paper, we study the fundamental class of linear-invariant properties called matroid freeness properties. These properties have been conjectured to essentially coincide with all testable linear-invariant properties, and a recent sequence of works has established testability for increasingly larger subclasses. One question left open, however, is whether the infinitely many syntactically different properties recently shown testable in fact correspond to new, semantically distinct ones. This is a crucial issue since it has also been shown that there exist subclasses of these properties for which an infinite set of syntactically different representations collapse into one of a small, finite set of properties, all previously known to be testable. An important question is therefore to understand the semantics of matroid freeness properties, and in particular when two syntactically different properties are truly distinct. We shed light on this problem by developing a method for determining the relation between two matroid freeness properties P and Q. Furthermore, we show that there is a natural subclass of matroid freeness properties such that for any two properties P and Q from this subclass, a strong dichotomy must hold: either P is contained in Q or the two properties are "well separated." As an application of this method, we exhibit new, infinite hierarchies of testable matroid freeness properties such that at each level of the hierarchy, there are functions that are far from all functions lying in lower levels of the hierarchy. Our key technical tool is an apparently new notion of maps between linear matroids, called matroid homomorphisms, that might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access