Source author record

M. Cárdenas

M. Cárdenas appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Weak $\mathcal Z$-structures and one-relator groups

Motivated by the notion of boundary for hyperbolic and $CAT(0)$ groups, M. Bestvina in "Local Homology Properties of Boundaries of Groups" introduced the notion of a (weak) $\mathcal Z$-structure and (weak) $\mathcal Z$-boundary for a group $G$ of type $\mathcal F$ (i.e., having a finite $K(G,1)$ complex), with implications concerning the Novikov conjecture for $G$. Since then, some classes of groups have been shown to admit a weak $\mathcal Z$-structure (see "Weak $\mathcal Z$-structures for some classes of groups" by C.R. Guilbault for example), but the question whether or not every group of type $\mathcal F$ admits such a structure remains open. In this paper, we show that every torsion free one-relator group admits a weak $\mathcal Z$-structure, by showing that they are all properly aspherical at infinity; moreover, in the $1$-ended case the corresponding weak $\mathcal Z$-boundary has the shape of either a circle or a Hawaiian earring depending on whether the group is a virtually surface group or not. Finally, we extend this result to a wider class of groups still satisfying a Freiheitssatz property.

preprint2020arXiv

A topological equivalence relation for finitely presented groups

In this paper, we consider an equivalence relation within the class of finitely presented discrete groups attending to their asymptotic topology rather than their asymptotic geometry. More precisely, we say that two finitely presented groups $G$ and $H$ are "proper $2$-equivalent" if there exist (equivalently, for all) finite $2$-dimensional CW-complexes $X$ and $Y$, with $π_1(X) \cong G$ and $π_1(Y) \cong H$, so that their universal covers $\widetilde{X}$ and $\widetilde{Y}$ are proper $2$-equivalent. It follows that this relation is coarser than the quasi-isometry relation. We point out that finitely presented groups which are $1$-ended and semistable at infinity are classified, up to proper $2$-equivalence, by their fundamental pro-group, and we study the behaviour of this relation with respect to some of the main constructions in combinatorial group theory. A (finer) similar equivalence relation may also be considered for groups of type $F_n, n \geq 3$, which captures more of the large-scale topology of the group. Finally, we pay special attention to the class of those groups $G$ which admit a finite $2$-dimensional CW-complex $X$ with $π_1(X) \cong G$ and whose universal cover $\widetilde{X}$ has the proper homotopy type of a $3$-manifold. We show that if such a group $G$ is $1$-ended and semistable at infinity then it is proper $2$-equivalent to either ${\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z}$, ${\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z}$ or ${\mathbb F}_2 \times {\mathbb Z}$ (here, ${\mathbb F}_2$ is the free group on two generators). As it turns out, this applies in particular to any group $G$ fitting as the middle term of a short exact sequence of infinite finitely presented groups, thus classifying such group extensions up to proper $2$-equivalence.