Paper detail

Weak $\mathcal Z$-structures and one-relator groups

Motivated by the notion of boundary for hyperbolic and $CAT(0)$ groups, M. Bestvina in "Local Homology Properties of Boundaries of Groups" introduced the notion of a (weak) $\mathcal Z$-structure and (weak) $\mathcal Z$-boundary for a group $G$ of type $\mathcal F$ (i.e., having a finite $K(G,1)$ complex), with implications concerning the Novikov conjecture for $G$. Since then, some classes of groups have been shown to admit a weak $\mathcal Z$-structure (see "Weak $\mathcal Z$-structures for some classes of groups" by C.R. Guilbault for example), but the question whether or not every group of type $\mathcal F$ admits such a structure remains open. In this paper, we show that every torsion free one-relator group admits a weak $\mathcal Z$-structure, by showing that they are all properly aspherical at infinity; moreover, in the $1$-ended case the corresponding weak $\mathcal Z$-boundary has the shape of either a circle or a Hawaiian earring depending on whether the group is a virtually surface group or not. Finally, we extend this result to a wider class of groups still satisfying a Freiheitssatz property.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.