Paper detail

A topological equivalence relation for finitely presented groups

In this paper, we consider an equivalence relation within the class of finitely presented discrete groups attending to their asymptotic topology rather than their asymptotic geometry. More precisely, we say that two finitely presented groups $G$ and $H$ are "proper $2$-equivalent" if there exist (equivalently, for all) finite $2$-dimensional CW-complexes $X$ and $Y$, with $π_1(X) \cong G$ and $π_1(Y) \cong H$, so that their universal covers $\widetilde{X}$ and $\widetilde{Y}$ are proper $2$-equivalent. It follows that this relation is coarser than the quasi-isometry relation. We point out that finitely presented groups which are $1$-ended and semistable at infinity are classified, up to proper $2$-equivalence, by their fundamental pro-group, and we study the behaviour of this relation with respect to some of the main constructions in combinatorial group theory. A (finer) similar equivalence relation may also be considered for groups of type $F_n, n \geq 3$, which captures more of the large-scale topology of the group. Finally, we pay special attention to the class of those groups $G$ which admit a finite $2$-dimensional CW-complex $X$ with $π_1(X) \cong G$ and whose universal cover $\widetilde{X}$ has the proper homotopy type of a $3$-manifold. We show that if such a group $G$ is $1$-ended and semistable at infinity then it is proper $2$-equivalent to either ${\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z}$, ${\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb Z}$ or ${\mathbb F}_2 \times {\mathbb Z}$ (here, ${\mathbb F}_2$ is the free group on two generators). As it turns out, this applies in particular to any group $G$ fitting as the middle term of a short exact sequence of infinite finitely presented groups, thus classifying such group extensions up to proper $2$-equivalence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.