BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Liangkai Liu

Liangkai Liu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceRoboticsMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Pulse-and-Glide-driven Adaptive Cruise Control System for Electric Vehicle

As the adaptive cruise control system (ACCS) on vehicles is well-developed today, vehicle manufacturers have increasingly employed this technology in new-generation intelligent vehicles. Pulse-and-glide (PnG) strategy is an efficacious driving strategy to diminish fuel consumption in traditional oil-fueled vehicles. However, current studies rarely focus on the verification of the energy-saving effect of PnG on an electric vehicle (EV) and embedding PnG in ACCS. This paper proposes a pulse-and-glide-driven adaptive cruise control system (PGACCS) model which leverages PnG strategy as a parallel function with cruise control (CC) and verifies that PnG is an efficacious energy-saving strategy on EV by optimizing the energy cost of the PnG operation using Intelligent Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization (IGPSO). This paper builds up a simulation model of an EV with regenerative braking and ACCS based on which the performance of PGACCS and regenerative braking is evaluated; the PnG energy performance is optimized and the effect of regenerative braking on PnG energy performance is evaluated. As a result of PnG optimization, the PnG operation in the PGACCS could cut down 28.3% energy cost of the EV compared to the CC operation in the traditional ACCS which verifies that PnG is an effective energy-saving strategy for EV and PGACCS is a promising option for EV.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Understanding Time Variations of DNN Inference in Autonomous Driving

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used in autonomous driving due to their high accuracy for perception, decision, and control. In safety-critical systems like autonomous driving, executing tasks like sensing and perception in real-time is vital to the vehicle's safety, which requires the application's execution time to be predictable. However, non-negligible time variations are observed in DNN inference. Current DNN inference studies either ignore the time variation issue or rely on the scheduler to handle it. None of the current work explains the root causes of DNN inference time variations. Understanding the time variations of the DNN inference becomes a fundamental challenge in real-time scheduling for autonomous driving. In this work, we analyze the time variation in DNN inference in fine granularity from six perspectives: data, I/O, model, runtime, hardware, and end-to-end perception system. Six insights are derived in understanding the time variations for DNN inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access