BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Khaza Anuarul Hoque

Khaza Anuarul Hoque contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and SecurityMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceEmerging Technologiescs.CYDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingHardware ArchitectureHuman-Computer InteractionNeural and Evolutionary Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Improving Reliability of Spiking Neural Networks through Fault Aware Threshold Voltage Optimization

Spiking neural networks have made breakthroughs in computer vision by lending themselves to neuromorphic hardware. However, the neuromorphic hardware lacks parallelism and hence, limits the throughput and hardware acceleration of SNNs on edge devices. To address this problem, many systolic-array SNN accelerators (systolicSNNs) have been proposed recently, but their reliability is still a major concern. In this paper, we first extensively analyze the impact of permanent faults on the SystolicSNNs. Then, we present a novel fault mitigation method, i.e., fault-aware threshold voltage optimization in retraining (FalVolt). FalVolt optimizes the threshold voltage for each layer in retraining to achieve the classification accuracy close to the baseline in the presence of faults. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed mitigation, we classify both static (i.e., MNIST) and neuromorphic datasets (i.e., N-MNIST and DVS Gesture) on a 256x256 systolicSNN with stuck-at faults. We empirically show that the classification accuracy of a systolicSNN drops significantly even at extremely low fault rates (as low as 0.012\%). Our proposed FalVolt mitigation method improves the performance of systolicSNNs by enabling them to operate at fault rates of up to 60\%, with a negligible drop in classification accuracy (as low as 0.1\%). Our results show that FalVolt is 2x faster compared to other state-of-the-art techniques common in artificial neural networks (ANNs), such as fault-aware pruning and retraining without threshold voltage optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Security-Aware Approximate Spiking Neural Networks

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are both known for their susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Therefore, researchers in the recent past have extensively studied the robustness and defense of DNNs and SNNs under adversarial attacks. Compared to accurate SNNs (AccSNN), approximate SNNs (AxSNNs) are known to be up to 4X more energy-efficient for ultra-low power applications. Unfortunately, the robustness of AxSNNs under adversarial attacks is yet unexplored. In this paper, we first extensively analyze the robustness of AxSNNs with different structural parameters and approximation levels under two gradient-based and two neuromorphic attacks. Then, we propose two novel defense methods, i.e., precision scaling and approximate quantization-aware filtering (AQF), for securing AxSNNs. We evaluated the effectiveness of these two defense methods using both static and neuromorphic datasets. Our results demonstrate that AxSNNs are more prone to adversarial attacks than AccSNNs, but precision scaling and AQF significantly improve the robustness of AxSNNs. For instance, a PGD attack on AxSNN results in a 72\% accuracy loss compared to AccSNN without any attack, whereas the same attack on the precision-scaled AxSNN leads to only a 17\% accuracy loss in the static MNIST dataset (4X robustness improvement). Similarly, a Sparse Attack on AxSNN leads to a 77\% accuracy loss when compared to AccSNN without any attack, whereas the same attack on an AxSNN with AQF leads to only a 2\% accuracy loss in the neuromorphic DVS128 Gesture dataset (38X robustness improvement).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

TruVR: Trustworthy Cybersickness Detection using Explainable Machine Learning

Cybersickness can be characterized by nausea, vertigo, headache, eye strain, and other discomforts when using virtual reality (VR) systems. The previously reported machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for detecting (classification) and predicting (regression) VR cybersickness use black-box models; thus, they lack explainability. Moreover, VR sensors generate a massive amount of data, resulting in complex and large models. Therefore, having inherent explainability in cybersickness detection models can significantly improve the model's trustworthiness and provide insight into why and how the ML/DL model arrived at a specific decision. To address this issue, we present three explainable machine learning (xML) models to detect and predict cybersickness: 1) explainable boosting machine (EBM), 2) decision tree (DT), and 3) logistic regression (LR). We evaluate xML-based models with publicly available physiological and gameplay datasets for cybersickness. The results show that the EBM can detect cybersickness with an accuracy of 99.75% and 94.10% for the physiological and gameplay datasets, respectively. On the other hand, while predicting the cybersickness, EBM resulted in a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.071 for the physiological dataset and 0.27 for the gameplay dataset. Furthermore, the EBM-based global explanation reveals exposure length, rotation, and acceleration as key features causing cybersickness in the gameplay dataset. In contrast, galvanic skin responses and heart rate are most significant in the physiological dataset. Our results also suggest that EBM-based local explanation can identify cybersickness-causing factors for individual samples. We believe the proposed xML-based cybersickness detection method can help future researchers understand, analyze, and design simpler cybersickness detection and reduction models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Exploring Fault-Energy Trade-offs in Approximate DNN Hardware Accelerators

Systolic array-based deep neural network (DNN) accelerators have recently gained prominence for their low computational cost. However, their high energy consumption poses a bottleneck to their deployment in energy-constrained devices. To address this problem, approximate computing can be employed at the cost of some tolerable accuracy loss. However, such small accuracy variations may increase the sensitivity of DNNs towards undesired subtle disturbances, such as permanent faults. The impact of permanent faults in accurate DNNs has been thoroughly investigated in the literature. Conversely, the impact of permanent faults in approximate DNN accelerators (AxDNNs) is yet under-explored. The impact of such faults may vary with the fault bit positions, activation functions and approximation errors in AxDNN layers. Such dynamacity poses a considerable challenge to exploring the trade-off between their energy efficiency and fault resilience in AxDNNs. Towards this, we present an extensive layer-wise and bit-wise fault resilience and energy analysis of different AxDNNs, using the state-of-the-art Evoapprox8b signed multipliers. In particular, we vary the stuck-at-0, stuck-at-1 fault-bit positions, and activation functions to study their impact using the most widely used MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets. Our quantitative analysis shows that the permanent faults exacerbate the accuracy loss in AxDNNs when compared to the accurate DNN accelerators. For instance, a permanent fault in AxDNNs can lead up to 66\% accuracy loss, whereas the same faulty bit can lead to only 9\% accuracy loss in an accurate DNN accelerator. Our results demonstrate that the fault resilience in AxDNNs is orthogonal to the energy efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Is Approximation Universally Defensive Against Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks?

Approximate computing is known for its effectiveness in improvising the energy efficiency of deep neural network (DNN) accelerators at the cost of slight accuracy loss. Very recently, the inexact nature of approximate components, such as approximate multipliers have also been reported successful in defending adversarial attacks on DNNs models. Since the approximation errors traverse through the DNN layers as masked or unmasked, this raises a key research question-can approximate computing always offer a defense against adversarial attacks in DNNs, i.e., are they universally defensive? Towards this, we present an extensive adversarial robustness analysis of different approximate DNN accelerators (AxDNNs) using the state-of-the-art approximate multipliers. In particular, we evaluate the impact of ten adversarial attacks on different AxDNNs using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. Our results demonstrate that adversarial attacks on AxDNNs can cause 53% accuracy loss whereas the same attack may lead to almost no accuracy loss (as low as 0.06%) in the accurate DNN. Thus, approximate computing cannot be referred to as a universal defense strategy against adversarial attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Attack Trees for Security and Privacy in Social Virtual Reality Learning Environments

Social Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE) is a novel edge computing platform for collaboration amongst distributed users. Given that VRLEs are used for critical applications (e.g., special education, public safety training), it is important to ensure security and privacy issues. In this paper, we present a novel framework to obtain quantitative assessments of threats and vulnerabilities for VRLEs. Based on the use cases from an actual social VRLE viz., vSocial, we first model the security and privacy using the attack trees. Subsequently, these attack trees are converted into stochastic timed automata representations that allow for rigorous statistical model checking. Such an analysis helps us adopt pertinent design principles such as hardening, diversity and principle of least privilege to enhance the resilience of social VRLEs. Through experiments in a vSocial case study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack tree modeling with a reduction of 26% in probability of loss of integrity (security) and 80% in privacy leakage (privacy) in before and after scenarios pertaining to the adoption of the design principles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access