BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Kevin Judd

Kevin Judd appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.soc-phSocial and Information Networksnlin.AOComputer Visionmath.OCmath.PRmath.STnlin.CDphysics.comp-phphysics.data-anStatistics TheorySystems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
12topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Non-probabilistic odds and forecasting with imperfect models

Probability forecasts are intended to account for the uncertainties inherent in forecasting. It is suggested that from an end-user's point of view probability is not necessarily sufficient to reflect uncertainties that are not simply the result of complexity or randomness, for example, probability forecasts may not adequately account for uncertainties due to model error. It is suggested that an alternative forecast product is to issue non-probabilistic odds forecasts, which may be as useful to end-users, and give a less distorted account of the uncertainties of a forecast. Our analysis of odds forecasts derives from game theory using the principle that if forecasters truly believe their forecasts, then they should take bets at the odds they offer and not expect to be bankrupted. Despite this game theoretic approach, it is not a market or economic evaluation; it is intended to be a scientific evaluation. Illustrative examples are given of the calculation of odds forecasts and their application to investment, loss mitigation and ensemble weather forecasting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Tracking an Object with Unknown Accelerations using a Shadowing Filter

A commonly encountered problem is the tracking of a physical object, like a maneuvering ship, aircraft, land vehicle, spacecraft or animate creature carrying a wireless device. The sensor data is often limited and inaccurate observations of range or bearing. This problem is more difficult than tracking a ballistic trajectory, because an operative affects unknown and arbitrarily changing accelerations. Although stochastic methods of filtering or state estimation (Kalman filters and particle filters) are widely used, out of vogue variational methods are more appropriate in this tracking context, because the objects do not typically display any significant random motions at the length and time scales of interest. This leads us to propose a rather elegant approach based on a \emph{shadowing filter}. The resulting filter is efficient (reduces to the solution of linear equations) and robust (uneffected by missing data and singular correlations that would cause catastrophic failure of Bayesian filters.) The tracking is so robust, that in some common situations it actually performs better by ignoring error correlations that are so vital to Kalman filters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Exactly scale-free scale-free networks

Many complex natural and physical systems exhibit patterns of interconnection that conform, approximately, to a network structure referred to as scale-free. Preferential attachment is one of many algorithms that have been introduced to model the growth and structure of scale-free networks. With so many different models of scale-free networks it is unclear what properties of scale-free networks are typical, and what properties are peculiarities of a particular growth or construction process. We propose a simple maximum entropy process which provides the best representation of what are typical properties of scale-free networks, and provides a standard against which real and algorithmically generated networks can be compared. As an example we consider preferential attachment and find that this particular growth model does not yield typical realizations of scale-free networks. In particular, the widely discussed "fragility" of scale-free networks is actually found to be due to the peculiar "hub-centric" structure of preferential attachment networks. We provide a method to generate or remove this latent hub-centric bias --- thereby demonstrating exactly which features of preferential attachment networks are atypical of the broader class of scale-free networks. We are also able to statistically demonstrate whether real networks are typical realizations of scale-free networks, or networks with that particular degree distribution; using a new surrogate generation method for complex networks, exactly analogous the the widely used surrogate tests of nonlinear time series analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Super-star networks: Growing optimal scale-free networks via likelihood

Preferential attachment --- by which new nodes attach to existing nodes with probability proportional to the existing nodes' degree --- has become the standard growth model for scale-free networks, where the asymptotic probability of a node having degree $k$ is proportional to $k^{-γ}$. However, the motivation for this model is entirely ad hoc. We use exact likelihood arguments and show that the optimal way to build a scale-free network is to attach most new links to nodes of low degree. Curiously, this leads to a scale-free networks with a single dominant hub: a star-like structure we call a super-star network. Asymptotically, the optimal strategy is to attach each new node to one of the nodes of degree $k$ with probability proportional to $\frac{1}{N+ζ(γ)(k+1)^γ}$ (in a $N$ node network) --- a stronger bias toward high degree nodes than exhibited by standard preferential attachment. Our algorithm generates optimally scale-free networks (the super-star networks) as well as randomly sampling the space of all scale-free networks with a given degree exponent $γ$. We generate viable realisation with finite $N$ for $1\ll γ<2$ as well as $γ>2$. We observe an apparently discontinuous transition at $γ\approx 2$ between so-called super-star networks and more tree-like realisations. Gradually increasing $γ$ further leads to re-emergence of a super-star hub. To quantify these structural features we derive a new analytic expression for the expected degree exponent of a pure preferential attachment process, and introduce alternative measures of network entropy. Our approach is generic and may also be applied to an arbitrary degree distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A surrogate for networks -- How scale-free is my scale-free network?

Complex networks are now being studied in a wide range of disciplines across science and technology. In this paper we propose a method by which one can probe the properties of experimentally obtained network data. Rather than just measuring properties of a network inferred from data, we aim to ask how typical is that network? What properties of the observed network are typical of all such scale free networks, and which are peculiar? To do this we propose a series of methods that can be used to generate statistically likely complex networks which are both similar to the observed data and also consistent with an underlying null-hypothesis -- for example a particular degree distribution. There is a direct analogy between the approach we propose here and the surrogate data methods applied to nonlinear time series data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

What exactly are the properties of scale-free and other networks?

The concept of scale-free networks has been widely applied across natural and physical sciences. Many claims are made about the properties of these networks, even though the concept of scale-free is often vaguely defined. We present tools and procedures to analyse the statistical properties of networks defined by arbitrary degree distributions and other constraints. Doing so reveals the highly likely properties, and some unrecognised richness, of scale-free networks, and casts doubt on some previously claimed properties being due to a scale-free characteristic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The stability of networks --- towards a structural dynamical systems theory

The need to build a link between the structure of a complex network and the dynamical properties of the corresponding complex system (comprised of multiple low dimensional systems) has recently become apparent. Several attempts to tackle this problem have been made and all focus on either the controllability or synchronisability of the network --- usually analyzed by way of the master stability function, or the graph Laplacian. We take a different approach. Using the basic tools from dynamical systems theory we show that the dynamical stability of a network can easily be defined in terms of the eigenvalues of an homologue of the network adjacency matrix. This allows us to compute the stability of a network (a quantity derived from the eigenspectrum of the adjacency matrix). Numerical experiments show that this quantity is very closely related too, and can even be predicted from, the standard structural network properties. Following from this we show that the stability of large network systems can be understood via an analytic study of the eigenvalues of their fixed points --- even for a very large number of fixed points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access