Paper detail

Non-probabilistic odds and forecasting with imperfect models

Probability forecasts are intended to account for the uncertainties inherent in forecasting. It is suggested that from an end-user's point of view probability is not necessarily sufficient to reflect uncertainties that are not simply the result of complexity or randomness, for example, probability forecasts may not adequately account for uncertainties due to model error. It is suggested that an alternative forecast product is to issue non-probabilistic odds forecasts, which may be as useful to end-users, and give a less distorted account of the uncertainties of a forecast. Our analysis of odds forecasts derives from game theory using the principle that if forecasters truly believe their forecasts, then they should take bets at the odds they offer and not expect to be bankrupted. Despite this game theoretic approach, it is not a market or economic evaluation; it is intended to be a scientific evaluation. Illustrative examples are given of the calculation of odds forecasts and their application to investment, loss mitigation and ensemble weather forecasting.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.