Source author record

Kamila M. Kotur

Kamila M. Kotur appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Limited ferromagnetic interactions in monolayers of MPS$_3$ (M=Mn, Ni)

We present a systematic study of the electronic and magnetic properties of two-dimensional ordered alloys, consisting of two representative hosts (MnPS$_3$ and NiPS$_3$) of transition metal phosphorus trichalcogenides doped with $3d$ elements. For both hosts our DFT+U calculations are able to qualitatively reproduce the ratios and signs of all experimentally observed magnetic couplings. The relative strength of all antiferromagnetic exchange couplings, both in MnPS$_3$ as well as in NiPS$_3$, can successfully be explained using an effective direct exchange model: they reveal that the third-neighbor exchange dominates in NiPS$_3$ due to the filling of the $t_{2g}$ subshell, whereas for MnPS$_3$ the first neighbor exchange is prevailed owing to the presence of the $t_{2g}$ magnetism. On the other hand, the nearest neighbor ferromagnetic coupling in NiPS$_3$ can only be explained using a more complex superexchange model and is (also) largely triggered by the absence of the $t_{2g}$ magnetism. For the doped systems, the DFT+U calculations revealed that magnetic impurities do not affect the magnetic ordering observed in the pure phases and thus in general in these systems ferromagnetism may not be easily induced by such a kind of elemental doping. However, unlike for the hosts, the first and second (dopant-host) exchange couplings are of similar order of magnitude. This leads to frustration in case of antiferromagnetic coupling and may be one of the reasons of the observed lower magnetic ordering temperature of the doped systems.