BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joshua Brakensiek

Joshua Brakensiek contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheoryInformation Theorymath.COmath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Simple Sublinear Algorithm for Gap Edit Distance

We study the problem of estimating the edit distance between two $n$-character strings. While exact computation in the worst case is believed to require near-quadratic time, previous work showed that in certain regimes it is possible to solve the following {\em gap edit distance} problem in sub-linear time: distinguish between inputs of distance $\le k$ and $>k^2$. Our main result is a very simple algorithm for this benchmark that runs in time $\tilde O(n/\sqrt{k})$, and in particular settles the open problem of obtaining a truly sublinear time for the entire range of relevant $k$. Building on the same framework, we also obtain a $k$-vs-$k^2$ algorithm for the one-sided preprocessing model with $\tilde O(n)$ preprocessing time and $\tilde O(n/k)$ query time (improving over a recent $\tilde O(n/k+k^2)$-query time algorithm for the same problem [GRS'20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Coded trace reconstruction in a constant number of traces

The coded trace reconstruction problem asks to construct a code $C\subset \{0,1\}^n$ such that any $x\in C$ is recoverable from independent outputs ("traces") of $x$ from a binary deletion channel (BDC). We present binary codes of rate $1-\varepsilon$ that are efficiently recoverable from ${\exp(O_q(\log^{1/3}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon})))}$ (a constant independent of $n$) traces of a $\operatorname{BDC}_q$ for any constant deletion probability $q\in(0,1)$. We also show that, for rate $1-\varepsilon$ binary codes, $\tilde Ω(\log^{5/2}(1/\varepsilon))$ traces are required. The results follow from a pair of black-box reductions that show that average-case trace reconstruction is essentially equivalent to coded trace reconstruction. We also show that there exist codes of rate $1-\varepsilon$ over an $O_{\varepsilon}(1)$-sized alphabet that are recoverable from $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ traces, and that this is tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Smoothed Complexity of 2-player Nash Equilibria

We prove that computing a Nash equilibrium of a two-player ($n \times n$) game with payoffs in $[-1,1]$ is PPAD-hard (under randomized reductions) even in the smoothed analysis setting, smoothing with noise of constant magnitude. This gives a strong negative answer to conjectures of Spielman and Teng [ST06] and Cheng, Deng, and Teng [CDT09]. In contrast to prior work proving PPAD-hardness after smoothing by noise of magnitude $1/\operatorname{poly}(n)$ [CDT09], our smoothed complexity result is not proved via hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria. This is by necessity, since Nash equilibria can be approximated to constant error in quasi-polynomial time [LMM03]. Our results therefore separate smoothed complexity and hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria in two-player games. The key ingredient in our reduction is the use of a random zero-sum game as a gadget to produce two-player games which remain hard even after smoothing. Our analysis crucially shows that all Nash equilibria of random zero-sum games are far from pure (with high probability), and that this remains true even after smoothing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access