BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
In this paper, we investigate the total coefficient size of Nullstellensatz proofs. We show that Nullstellensatz proofs of the pigeonhole principle on n pigeons require total coefficient size 2Ω(n) and that there exist Nullstellensatz proofs of the ordering principle on n elements with total coefficient size 2n−n.
In this paper, we introduce and analyze a new operation ∘R which mixes two distributions Ω and Ω′ via a random orthogonal matrix. In particular, we take Ω∘RΩ′ to be the limit as n→∞ of the distribution of singular values of DRD′ where D and D′ are n×n diagonal matrices whose diagonal entries have distributions Ω and Ω′ respectively and R is a random n×n orthogonal matrix. We show that ∘R has several nice properties. We first observe that ∘R is commutative and associative and compute the moments of Ω∘RΩ′ in terms of the moments of Ω and Ω′. We then show that ∘R interacts very nicely with the spectrum of the singular values of Z-shaped and multi-Z-shaped graph matrices. This allows us to answer the question posed by our previous paper of how to describe the spectrum of the singular values of Z-shaped and multi-Z-shaped graph matrices when the input distribution is not {−1,1}. In our analysis, we show that the moments of our distributions are closely connected to non-crossing partitions and prove a number of new results on non-crossing partitions which may be of independent interest.
In this paper, we propose the following conjecture which generalizes a theorem proved by Huang [Hua19] in his recent breakthrough proof of the sensitivity conjecture. We conjecture that for any Cayley graph X=Γ(G,S) on a group G and any generating set S, if U⊆G has size ∣U∣>∣G∣/2, then the induced subgraph of X on U has maximum degree at least ∣S∣/2. Using a recent idea of Alon and Zheng [AZ20], who proved this conjecture for the special case when G=Z2n, we prove that this conjecture is true whenever G is abelian. We also observe that for this conjecture to hold for a graph X, some symmetry is required: it is insufficient for X to just be regular and bipartite.
Given a predicate P:{−1,1}k→{−1,1}, let CSP(P) be the set of constraint satisfaction problems whose constraints are of the form P. We say that P is approximable if given a nearly satisfiable instance of CSP(P), there exists a probabilistic polynomial time algorithm that does better than a random assignment. Otherwise, we say that P is approximation resistant. In this paper, we analyze presidential type predicates, which are balanced linear threshold functions where all of the variables except the first variable (the president) have the same weight. We show that almost all presidential-type predicates P are approximable. More precisely, we prove the following result: for any δ0>0, there exists a k0 such that if k≥k0, δ∈(δ0,1−2/k], and δk+k−1 is an odd integer then the presidential type predicate P(x)=sign(δkx1+∑i=2kxi) is approximable. To prove this, we construct a rounding scheme that makes use of biases and pairwise biases. We also give evidence that using pairwise biases is necessary for such rounding schemes.
In this paper, we analyze the sum of squares hierarchy (SOS) on the ordering principle on n elements. We prove that degree O(nlog(n)) SOS can prove the ordering principle. We then show that this upper bound is essentially tight by proving that for any ε>0, SOS requires degree Ω(n21−ε) to prove the ordering principle on n elements.
The Sum-of-Squares (SoS) hierarchy is a semi-definite programming meta-algorithm that captures state-of-the-art polynomial time guarantees for many optimization problems such as Max-k-CSPs and Tensor PCA. On the flip side, a SoS lower bound provides evidence of hardness, which is particularly relevant to average-case problems for which NP-hardness may not be available. In this paper, we consider the following average case problem, which we call the \emph{Planted Affine Planes} (PAP) problem: Given m random vectors d1,…,dm in Rn, can we prove that there is no vector v∈Rn such that for all u∈[m], ⟨v,du⟩2=1? In other words, can we prove that m random vectors are not all contained in two parallel hyperplanes at equal distance from the origin? We prove that for m≤n3/2−ε, with high probability, degree-nΩ(ε) SoS fails to refute the existence of such a vector v. When the vectors d1,…,dm are chosen from the multivariate normal distribution, the PAP problem is equivalent to the problem of proving that a random n-dimensional subspace of Rm does not contain a boolean vector. As shown by Mohanty--Raghavendra--Xu [STOC 2020], a lower bound for this problem implies a lower bound for the problem of certifying energy upper bounds on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian, and so our lower bound implies a degree-nΩ(ε) SoS lower bound for the certification version of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick problem.
We prove that with high probability over the choice of a random graph G from the Erdős-Rényi distribution G(n,1/2), the nO(d)-time degree d Sum-of-Squares semidefinite programming relaxation for the clique problem will give a value of at least n1/2−c(d/logn)1/2 for some constant c>0. This yields a nearly tight n1/2−o(1) bound on the value of this program for any degree d=o(logn). Moreover we introduce a new framework that we call \emph{pseudo-calibration} to construct Sum of Squares lower bounds. This framework is inspired by taking a computational analog of Bayesian probability theory. It yields a general recipe for constructing good pseudo-distributions (i.e., dual certificates for the Sum-of-Squares semidefinite program), and sheds further light on the ways in which this hierarchy differs from others.
We separate monotone analogues of L and NL by proving that any monotone switching network solving directed connectivity on n vertices must have size at least n(Ω(lg(n))).
The problem of finding large cliques in random graphs and its "planted" variant, where one wants to recover a clique of size ω≫log(n) added to an \Erdos-\Renyi graph G∼G(n,21), have been intensely studied. Nevertheless, existing polynomial time algorithms can only recover planted cliques of size ω=Ω(n). By contrast, information theoretically, one can recover planted cliques so long as ω≫log(n). In this work, we continue the investigation of algorithms from the sum of squares hierarchy for solving the planted clique problem begun by Meka, Potechin, and Wigderson (MPW, 2015) and Deshpande and Montanari (DM,2015). Our main results improve upon both these previous works by showing: 1. Degree four SoS does not recover the planted clique unless ω≫npolylogn, improving upon the bound ω≫n1/3 due to DM. A similar result was obtained independently by Raghavendra and Schramm (2015). 2. For 2<d=o(log(n)), degree 2d SoS does not recover the planted clique unless ω≫n1/(d+1)/(2dpolylogn), improving upon the bound due to MPW. Our proof for the second result is based on a fine spectral analysis of the certificate used in the prior works MPW,DM and Feige and Krauthgamer (2003) by decomposing it along an appropriately chosen basis. Along the way, we develop combinatorial tools to analyze the spectrum of random matrices with dependent entries and to understand the symmetries in the eigenspaces of the set symmetric matrices inspired by work of Grigoriev (2001). An argument of Kelner shows that the first result cannot be proved using the same certificate. Rather, our proof involves constructing and analyzing a new certificate that yields the nearly tight lower bound by "correcting" the certificate of previous works.
Finding cliques in random graphs and the closely related "planted" clique variant, where a clique of size k is planted in a random G(n, 1/2) graph, have been the focus of substantial study in algorithm design. Despite much effort, the best known polynomial-time algorithms only solve the problem for k ~ sqrt(n). In this paper we study the complexity of the planted clique problem under algorithms from the Sum-of-squares hierarchy. We prove the first average case lower bound for this model: for almost all graphs in G(n,1/2), r rounds of the SOS hierarchy cannot find a planted k-clique unless k > n^{1/2r} (up to logarithmic factors). Thus, for any constant number of rounds planted cliques of size n^{o(1)} cannot be found by this powerful class of algorithms. This is shown via an integrability gap for the natural formulation of maximum clique problem on random graphs for SOS and Lasserre hierarchies, which in turn follow from degree lower bounds for the Positivestellensatz proof system. We follow the usual recipe for such proofs. First, we introduce a natural "dual certificate" (also known as a "vector-solution" or "pseudo-expectation") for the given system of polynomial equations representing the problem for every fixed input graph. Then we show that the matrix associated with this dual certificate is PSD (positive semi-definite) with high probability over the choice of the input graph.This requires the use of certain tools. One is the theory of association schemes, and in particular the eigenspaces and eigenvalues of the Johnson scheme. Another is a combinatorial method we develop to compute (via traces) norm bounds for certain random matrices whose entries are highly dependent; we hope this method will be useful elsewhere.
A set of q triangles sharing a common edge is a called a book of size q. Letting bk(G) denote the size of the largest book in a graph G, Erdős and Rothschild \cite{erdostwo} asked what the minimal value of bk(G) is for graphs G with n vertices and a set number of edges where every edge is contained in at least one triangle. In this paper, we show that for any graph G with n vertices and 4n2−nf(n) edges where every edge is contained in at least one triangle, bk(G)≥Ω(min{f(n)n,f(n)2n2}).
In this paper, we prove almost tight bounds on the size of sound monotone switching networks accepting permutations sets of directed trees. This roughly corresponds to proving almost tight bounds bounds on the monotone memory efficiency of the directed ST-connectivity problem for the special case in which the input graph is guaranteed to have no path from s to t or be isomorphic to a specific directed tree.
In this paper, we analyze the monotone space of complexity of directed connectivity for a large class of input graphs G using the switching network model. The upper and lower bounds we obtain are a significant generalization of previous results and the proofs involve several completely new techniques and ideas.
L (Logarithmic space) versus NL (Non-deterministic logarithmic space) is one of the great open problems in computational complexity theory. In the paper "Bounds on monotone switching networks for directed connectivity", we separated monotone analogues of L and NL using a model called the switching network model. In particular, by considering inputs consisting of just a path and isolated vertices, we proved that any monotone switching network solving directed connectivity on N vertices must have size at least NΩ(lg(N)) and this bound is tight. If we could show a similar result for general switching networks solving directed connectivity, then this would prove that L=NL. However, proving lower bounds for general switching networks solving directed connectivity requires proving stronger lower bounds on monotone switching networks for directed connectivity. To work towards this goal, we investigated a different set of inputs which we believed to be hard for monotone switching networks to solve and attempted to prove similar lower size bounds. Instead, we found that this set of inputs is actually easy for monotone switching networks for directed connectivity to solve, yet if we restrict ourselves to certain-knowledge switching networks, which are a simple and intuitive subclass of monotone switching networks for directed connectivity, then these inputs are indeed hard to solve. In this paper, we give this set of inputs, demonstrate a "weird" polynomially-sized monotone switching network for directed connectivity which solves this set of inputs, and prove that no polynomially-sized certain-knowledge switching network can solve this set of inputs, thus proving that monotone switching networks for directed connectivity are strictly more powerful than certain-knowledge switching networks.
The critical group of a graph is a finite abelian group whose order is the number of spanning forests of the graph. This paper provides three basic structural results on the critical group of a line graph. The first deals with connected graphs containing no cut-edge. Here the number of independent cycles in the graph, which is known to bound the number of generators for the critical group of the graph, is shown also to bound the number of generators for the critical group of its line graph. The second gives, for each prime p, a constraint on the p-primary structure of the critical group, based on the largest power of p dividing all sums of degrees of two adjacent vertices. The third deals with connected graphs whose line graph is regular. Here known results relating the number of spanning trees of the graph and of its line graph are sharpened to exact sequences which relate their critical groups. The first two results interact extremely well with the third. For example, they imply that in a regular nonbipartite graph, the critical group of the graph and that of its line graph determine each other uniquely in a simple fashion.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.