Researcher profile

Jörg Martin

Jörg Martin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Use of synthetic data for training dose estimation neural networks in CT dosimetry

Personalized computed tomography (CT) dosimetry has great potential in assessing patient-specific radiation exposure, supporting risk assessment, and optimizing clinical protocols. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of synthetic anatomical data for improving machine learning-based personalized computed tomography (CT) dosimetry. It is investigated whether the combination of synthetic human body geometries with real patient data can improve model accuracy and generalization for CT organ dose estimation while maintaining the uncertainty requirements outlined in IAEA TRS-457. Deep learning models for organ dose prediction are trained using datasets with varying proportions of real and synthetic data. Synthetic datasets are generated from computational human phantoms with controlled distributions of organ volumes and body. A dedicated model uncertainty evaluation method is implemented to quantify prediction reliability and verify compliance with TRS-457 accuracy limits. Model performance and uncertainty are compared across different training data compositions, including a model trained solely on real patient data. As baseline validated Monte Carlo simulation is used. Models trained solely on synthetic data show limited predictive accuracy, particularly for small or peripheral organs. Incorporating as little as 10 % real patient data significantly improves both statistical accuracy and uncertainty estimates, achieving a performance comparable to that of real-only models. The hybrid training approach improves robustness across different anatomies while maintaining TRS-457-compliant uncertainty levels (k=2 uncertainty < 20% for adults). The results indicate that the combination of real and synthetic data in combination with a systematic uncertainty assessment supports the development of CT dosimetry models and at the same time reduces the amount of real data required.

preprint2020arXiv

Detecting unusual input to neural networks

Evaluating a neural network on an input that differs markedly from the training data might cause erratic and flawed predictions. We study a method that judges the unusualness of an input by evaluating its informative content compared to the learned parameters. This technique can be used to judge whether a network is suitable for processing a certain input and to raise a red flag that unexpected behavior might lie ahead. We compare our approach to various methods for uncertainty evaluation from the literature for various datasets and scenarios. Specifically, we introduce a simple, effective method that allows to directly compare the output of such metrics for single input points even if these metrics live on different scales.

preprint2020arXiv

The variation of the posterior variance and Bayesian sample size determination

We consider Bayesian sample size determination using a criterion that utilizes the first two moments of the expected posterior variance. We study the resulting sample size in dependence on the chosen prior and explore the success rate for bounding the posterior variance below a prescribed limit under the true sampling distribution. Compared with sample size determination based on the expected average of the posterior variance the proposed criterion leads to an increase in sample size and significantly improved success rates. Generic asymptotic properties are proven, such as an asymptotic expression for the sample size and a sort of phase transition. Our study is illustrated using two real world datasets with Poisson and normally distributed data. Based on our results some recommendations are given.