Paper detail

Use of synthetic data for training dose estimation neural networks in CT dosimetry

Personalized computed tomography (CT) dosimetry has great potential in assessing patient-specific radiation exposure, supporting risk assessment, and optimizing clinical protocols. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of synthetic anatomical data for improving machine learning-based personalized computed tomography (CT) dosimetry. It is investigated whether the combination of synthetic human body geometries with real patient data can improve model accuracy and generalization for CT organ dose estimation while maintaining the uncertainty requirements outlined in IAEA TRS-457. Deep learning models for organ dose prediction are trained using datasets with varying proportions of real and synthetic data. Synthetic datasets are generated from computational human phantoms with controlled distributions of organ volumes and body. A dedicated model uncertainty evaluation method is implemented to quantify prediction reliability and verify compliance with TRS-457 accuracy limits. Model performance and uncertainty are compared across different training data compositions, including a model trained solely on real patient data. As baseline validated Monte Carlo simulation is used. Models trained solely on synthetic data show limited predictive accuracy, particularly for small or peripheral organs. Incorporating as little as 10 % real patient data significantly improves both statistical accuracy and uncertainty estimates, achieving a performance comparable to that of real-only models. The hybrid training approach improves robustness across different anatomies while maintaining TRS-457-compliant uncertainty levels (k=2 uncertainty < 20% for adults). The results indicate that the combination of real and synthetic data in combination with a systematic uncertainty assessment supports the development of CT dosimetry models and at the same time reduces the amount of real data required.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.