BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joost Broekens

Joost Broekens contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningHuman-Computer InteractionRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Unifying Framework for Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Sequential decision making, commonly formalized as optimization of a Markov Decision Process, is a key challenge in artificial intelligence. Two successful approaches to MDP optimization are reinforcement learning and planning, which both largely have their own research communities. However, if both research fields solve the same problem, then we might be able to disentangle the common factors in their solution approaches. Therefore, this paper presents a unifying algorithmic framework for reinforcement learning and planning (FRAP), which identifies underlying dimensions on which MDP planning and learning algorithms have to decide. At the end of the paper, we compare a variety of well-known planning, model-free and model-based RL algorithms along these dimensions. Altogether, the framework may help provide deeper insight in the algorithmic design space of planning and reinforcement learning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Sequential decision making, commonly formalized as Markov Decision Process (MDP) optimization, is a important challenge in artificial intelligence. Two key approaches to this problem are reinforcement learning (RL) and planning. This paper presents a survey of the integration of both fields, better known as model-based reinforcement learning. Model-based RL has two main steps. First, we systematically cover approaches to dynamics model learning, including challenges like dealing with stochasticity, uncertainty, partial observability, and temporal abstraction. Second, we present a systematic categorization of planning-learning integration, including aspects like: where to start planning, what budgets to allocate to planning and real data collection, how to plan, and how to integrate planning in the learning and acting loop. After these two sections, we also discuss implicit model-based RL as an end-to-end alternative for model learning and planning, and we cover the potential benefits of model-based RL. Along the way, the survey also draws connections to several related RL fields, like hierarchical RL and transfer learning. Altogether, the survey presents a broad conceptual overview of the combination of planning and learning for MDP optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Blast From the Past: Personalizing Predictions of Video-Induced Emotions using Personal Memories as Context

A key challenge in the accurate prediction of viewers' emotional responses to video stimuli in real-world applications is accounting for person- and situation-specific variation. An important contextual influence shaping individuals' subjective experience of a video is the personal memories that it triggers in them. Prior research has found that this memory influence explains more variation in video-induced emotions than other contextual variables commonly used for personalizing predictions, such as viewers' demographics or personality. In this article, we show that (1) automatic analysis of text describing their video-triggered memories can account for variation in viewers' emotional responses, and (2) that combining such an analysis with that of a video's audiovisual content enhances the accuracy of automatic predictions. We discuss the relevance of these findings for improving on state of the art approaches to automated affective video analysis in personalized contexts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Second Type of Uncertainty in Monte Carlo Tree Search

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) efficiently balances exploration and exploitation in tree search based on count-derived uncertainty. However, these local visit counts ignore a second type of uncertainty induced by the size of the subtree below an action. We first show how, due to the lack of this second uncertainty type, MCTS may completely fail in well-known sparse exploration problems, known from the reinforcement learning community. We then introduce a new algorithm, which estimates the size of the subtree below an action, and leverages this information in the UCB formula to better direct exploration. Subsequently, we generalize these ideas by showing that loops, i.e., the repeated occurrence of (approximately) the same state in the same trace, are actually a special case of subtree depth variation. Testing on a variety of tasks shows that our algorithms increase sample efficiency, especially when the planning budget per timestep is small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Think Too Fast Nor Too Slow: The Computational Trade-off Between Planning And Reinforcement Learning

Planning and reinforcement learning are two key approaches to sequential decision making. Multi-step approximate real-time dynamic programming, a recently successful algorithm class of which AlphaZero [Silver et al., 2018] is an example, combines both by nesting planning within a learning loop. However, the combination of planning and learning introduces a new question: how should we balance time spend on planning, learning and acting? The importance of this trade-off has not been explicitly studied before. We show that it is actually of key importance, with computational results indicating that we should neither plan too long nor too short. Conceptually, we identify a new spectrum of planning-learning algorithms which ranges from exhaustive search (long planning) to model-free RL (no planning), with optimal performance achieved midway.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access