BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Aske Plaat

Aske Plaat contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeural and Evolutionary ComputingRoboticsComputation and Language

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
14works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Agentic Large Language Models, a survey

Background: There is great interest in agentic LLMs, large language models that act as agents. Objectives: We review the growing body of work in this area and provide a research agenda. Methods: Agentic LLMs are LLMs that (1) reason, (2) act, and (3) interact. We organize the literature according to these three categories. Results: The research in the first category focuses on reasoning, reflection, and retrieval, aiming to improve decision making; the second category focuses on action models, robots, and tools, aiming for agents that act as useful assistants; the third category focuses on multi-agent systems, aiming for collaborative task solving and simulating interaction to study emergent social behavior. We find that works mutually benefit from results in other categories: retrieval enables tool use, reflection improves multi-agent collaboration, and reasoning benefits all categories. Conclusions: We discuss applications of agentic LLMs and provide an agenda for further research. Important applications are in medical diagnosis, logistics and financial market analysis. Meanwhile, self-reflective agents playing roles and interacting with one another augment the process of scientific research itself. Further, agentic LLMs provide a solution for the problem of LLMs running out of training data: inference-time behavior generates new training states, such that LLMs can keep learning without needing ever larger datasets. We note that there is risk associated with LLM assistants taking action in the real world-safety, liability and security are open problems-while agentic LLMs are also likely to benefit society.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

First Go, then Post-Explore: the Benefits of Post-Exploration in Intrinsic Motivation

Go-Explore achieved breakthrough performance on challenging reinforcement learning (RL) tasks with sparse rewards. The key insight of Go-Explore was that successful exploration requires an agent to first return to an interesting state ('Go'), and only then explore into unknown terrain ('Explore'). We refer to such exploration after a goal is reached as 'post-exploration'. In this paper, we present a clear ablation study of post-exploration in a general intrinsically motivated goal exploration process (IMGEP) framework, that the Go-Explore paper did not show. We study the isolated potential of post-exploration, by turning it on and off within the same algorithm under both tabular and deep RL settings on both discrete navigation and continuous control tasks. Experiments on a range of MiniGrid and Mujoco environments show that post-exploration indeed helps IMGEP agents reach more diverse states and boosts their performance. In short, our work suggests that RL researchers should consider to use post-exploration in IMGEP when possible since it is effective, method-agnostic and easy to implement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Unifying Framework for Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Sequential decision making, commonly formalized as optimization of a Markov Decision Process, is a key challenge in artificial intelligence. Two successful approaches to MDP optimization are reinforcement learning and planning, which both largely have their own research communities. However, if both research fields solve the same problem, then we might be able to disentangle the common factors in their solution approaches. Therefore, this paper presents a unifying algorithmic framework for reinforcement learning and planning (FRAP), which identifies underlying dimensions on which MDP planning and learning algorithms have to decide. At the end of the paper, we compare a variety of well-known planning, model-free and model-based RL algorithms along these dimensions. Altogether, the framework may help provide deeper insight in the algorithmic design space of planning and reinforcement learning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Sequential decision making, commonly formalized as Markov Decision Process (MDP) optimization, is a important challenge in artificial intelligence. Two key approaches to this problem are reinforcement learning (RL) and planning. This paper presents a survey of the integration of both fields, better known as model-based reinforcement learning. Model-based RL has two main steps. First, we systematically cover approaches to dynamics model learning, including challenges like dealing with stochasticity, uncertainty, partial observability, and temporal abstraction. Second, we present a systematic categorization of planning-learning integration, including aspects like: where to start planning, what budgets to allocate to planning and real data collection, how to plan, and how to integrate planning in the learning and acting loop. After these two sections, we also discuss implicit model-based RL as an end-to-end alternative for model learning and planning, and we cover the potential benefits of model-based RL. Along the way, the survey also draws connections to several related RL fields, like hierarchical RL and transfer learning. Altogether, the survey presents a broad conceptual overview of the combination of planning and learning for MDP optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Credit Assignment in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) has held longstanding promise to advance reinforcement learning. Yet, it has remained a considerable challenge to develop practical algorithms that exhibit some of these promises. To improve our fundamental understanding of HRL, we investigate hierarchical credit assignment from the perspective of conventional multistep reinforcement learning. We show how e.g., a 1-step `hierarchical backup' can be seen as a conventional multistep backup with $n$ skip connections over time connecting each subsequent state to the first independent of actions inbetween. Furthermore, we find that generalizing hierarchy to multistep return estimation methods requires us to consider how to partition the environment trace, in order to construct backup paths. We leverage these insight to develop a new hierarchical algorithm Hier$Q_k(λ)$, for which we demonstrate that hierarchical credit assignment alone can already boost agent performance (i.e., when eliminating generalization or exploration). Altogether, our work yields fundamental insight into the nature of hierarchical backups and distinguishes this as an additional basis for reinforcement learning research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Reliable validation of Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is one of the most dynamic research areas in Game AI and AI as a whole, and a wide variety of games are used as its prominent test problems. However, it is subject to the replicability crisis that currently affects most algorithmic AI research. Benchmarking in Reinforcement Learning could be improved through verifiable results. There are numerous benchmark environments whose scores are used to compare different algorithms, such as Atari. Nevertheless, reviewers must trust that figures represent truthful values, as it is difficult to reproduce an exact training curve. We propose improving this situation by providing access to the original experimental data to validate study results. To that end, we rely on the concept of minimal traces. These allow re-simulation of action sequences in deterministic RL environments and, in turn, enable reviewers to verify, re-use, and manually inspect experimental results without needing large compute clusters. It also permits validation of presented reward graphs, an inspection of individual episodes, and re-use of result data (baselines) for proper comparison in follow-up papers. We offer plug-and-play code that works with Gym so that our measures fit well in the existing RL and reproducibility eco-system. Our approach is freely available, easy to use, and adds minimal overhead, as minimal traces allow a data compression ratio of up to $\approx 10^4:1$ (94GB to 8MB for Atari Pong) compared to a regular MDP trace used in offline RL datasets. The paper presents proof-of-concept results for a variety of games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

When to Go, and When to Explore: The Benefit of Post-Exploration in Intrinsic Motivation

Go-Explore achieved breakthrough performance on challenging reinforcement learning (RL) tasks with sparse rewards. The key insight of Go-Explore was that successful exploration requires an agent to first return to an interesting state ('Go'), and only then explore into unknown terrain ('Explore'). We refer to such exploration after a goal is reached as 'post-exploration'. In this paper we present a systematic study of post-exploration, answering open questions that the Go-Explore paper did not answer yet. First, we study the isolated potential of post-exploration, by turning it on and off within the same algorithm. Subsequently, we introduce new methodology to adaptively decide when to post-explore and for how long to post-explore. Experiments on a range of MiniGrid environments show that post-exploration indeed boosts performance (with a bigger impact than tuning regular exploration parameters), and this effect is further enhanced by adaptively deciding when and for how long to post-explore. In short, our work identifies adaptive post-exploration as a promising direction for RL exploration research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Procedural Content Generation: Better Benchmarks for Transfer Reinforcement Learning

The idea of transfer in reinforcement learning (TRL) is intriguing: being able to transfer knowledge from one problem to another problem without learning everything from scratch. This promises quicker learning and learning more complex methods. To gain an insight into the field and to detect emerging trends, we performed a database search. We note a surprisingly late adoption of deep learning that starts in 2018. The introduction of deep learning has not yet solved the greatest challenge of TRL: generalization. Transfer between different domains works well when domains have strong similarities (e.g. MountainCar to Cartpole), and most TRL publications focus on different tasks within the same domain that have few differences. Most TRL applications we encountered compare their improvements against self-defined baselines, and the field is still missing unified benchmarks. We consider this to be a disappointing situation. For the future, we note that: (1) A clear measure of task similarity is needed. (2) Generalization needs to improve. Promising approaches merge deep learning with planning via MCTS or introduce memory through LSTMs. (3) The lack of benchmarking tools will be remedied to enable meaningful comparison and measure progress. Already Alchemy and Meta-World are emerging as interesting benchmark suites. We note that another development, the increase in procedural content generation (PCG), can improve both benchmarking and generalization in TRL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Visualizing MuZero Models

MuZero, a model-based reinforcement learning algorithm that uses a value equivalent dynamics model, achieved state-of-the-art performance in Chess, Shogi and the game of Go. In contrast to standard forward dynamics models that predict a full next state, value equivalent models are trained to predict a future value, thereby emphasizing value relevant information in the representations. While value equivalent models have shown strong empirical success, there is no research yet that visualizes and investigates what types of representations these models actually learn. Therefore, in this paper we visualize the latent representation of MuZero agents. We find that action trajectories may diverge between observation embeddings and internal state transition dynamics, which could lead to instability during planning. Based on this insight, we propose two regularization techniques to stabilize MuZero's performance. Additionally, we provide an open-source implementation of MuZero along with an interactive visualizer of learned representations, which may aid further investigation of value equivalent algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A New Challenge: Approaching Tetris Link with AI

Decades of research have been invested in making computer programs for playing games such as Chess and Go. This paper focuses on a new game, Tetris Link, a board game that is still lacking any scientific analysis. Tetris Link has a large branching factor, hampering a traditional heuristic planning approach. We explore heuristic planning and two other approaches: Reinforcement Learning, Monte Carlo tree search. We document our approach and report on their relative performance in a tournament. Curiously, the heuristic approach is stronger than the planning/learning approaches. However, experienced human players easily win the majority of the matches against the heuristic planning AIs. We, therefore, surmise that Tetris Link is more difficult than expected. We offer our findings to the community as a challenge to improve upon.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Analysis of Hyper-Parameters for Small Games: Iterations or Epochs in Self-Play?

The landmark achievements of AlphaGo Zero have created great research interest into self-play in reinforcement learning. In self-play, Monte Carlo Tree Search is used to train a deep neural network, that is then used in tree searches. Training itself is governed by many hyperparameters.There has been surprisingly little research on design choices for hyper-parameter values and loss-functions, presumably because of the prohibitive computational cost to explore the parameter space. In this paper, we investigate 12 hyper-parameters in an AlphaZero-like self-play algorithm and evaluate how these parameters contribute to training. We use small games, to achieve meaningful exploration with moderate computational effort. The experimental results show that training is highly sensitive to hyper-parameter choices. Through multi-objective analysis we identify 4 important hyper-parameters to further assess. To start, we find surprising results where too much training can sometimes lead to lower performance. Our main result is that the number of self-play iterations subsumes MCTS-search simulations, game-episodes, and training epochs. The intuition is that these three increase together as self-play iterations increase, and that increasing them individually is sub-optimal. A consequence of our experiments is a direct recommendation for setting hyper-parameter values in self-play: the overarching outer-loop of self-play iterations should be maximized, in favor of the three inner-loop hyper-parameters, which should be set at lower values. A secondary result of our experiments concerns the choice of optimization goals, for which we also provide recommendations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tackling Morpion Solitaire with AlphaZero-likeRanked Reward Reinforcement Learning

Morpion Solitaire is a popular single player game, performed with paper and pencil. Due to its large state space (on the order of the game of Go) traditional search algorithms, such as MCTS, have not been able to find good solutions. A later algorithm, Nested Rollout Policy Adaptation, was able to find a new record of 82 steps, albeit with large computational resources. After achieving this record, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no further progress reported, for about a decade. In this paper we take the recent impressive performance of deep self-learning reinforcement learning approaches from AlphaGo/AlphaZero as inspiration to design a searcher for Morpion Solitaire. A challenge of Morpion Solitaire is that the state space is sparse, there are few win/loss signals. Instead, we use an approach known as ranked reward to create a reinforcement learning self-play framework for Morpion Solitaire. This enables us to find medium-quality solutions with reasonable computational effort. Our record is a 67 steps solution, which is very close to the human best (68) without any other adaptation to the problem than using ranked reward. We list many further avenues for potential improvement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Second Type of Uncertainty in Monte Carlo Tree Search

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) efficiently balances exploration and exploitation in tree search based on count-derived uncertainty. However, these local visit counts ignore a second type of uncertainty induced by the size of the subtree below an action. We first show how, due to the lack of this second uncertainty type, MCTS may completely fail in well-known sparse exploration problems, known from the reinforcement learning community. We then introduce a new algorithm, which estimates the size of the subtree below an action, and leverages this information in the UCB formula to better direct exploration. Subsequently, we generalize these ideas by showing that loops, i.e., the repeated occurrence of (approximately) the same state in the same trace, are actually a special case of subtree depth variation. Testing on a variety of tasks shows that our algorithms increase sample efficiency, especially when the planning budget per timestep is small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Warm-Start AlphaZero Self-Play Search Enhancements

Recently, AlphaZero has achieved landmark results in deep reinforcement learning, by providing a single self-play architecture that learned three different games at super human level. AlphaZero is a large and complicated system with many parameters, and success requires much compute power and fine-tuning. Reproducing results in other games is a challenge, and many researchers are looking for ways to improve results while reducing computational demands. AlphaZero's design is purely based on self-play and makes no use of labeled expert data ordomain specific enhancements; it is designed to learn from scratch. We propose a novel approach to deal with this cold-start problem by employing simple search enhancements at the beginning phase of self-play training, namely Rollout, Rapid Action Value Estimate (RAVE) and dynamically weighted combinations of these with the neural network, and Rolling Horizon Evolutionary Algorithms (RHEA). Our experiments indicate that most of these enhancements improve the performance of their baseline player in three different (small) board games, with especially RAVE based variants playing strongly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access